Nye Bevan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 13. Elections are a hassle, and do cost money, it's true |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 11:31 AM by MathGuy
But I kind of like them. Especially when a US Senator is being chosen.
|
| -Governors should *not* be allowed to fill vacant senate seats |
MathGuy |
Dec-09-08 10:55 AM |
#0 |
-
that belief tells me you have no idea of why the Senate was created n/t |
ProdigalJunkMail |
Dec-09-08 10:56 AM |
#1 |
 -
Cronyism, nepotism, and corruption? |
liberal N proud |
Dec-09-08 11:04 AM |
#2 |
  -
right... |
ProdigalJunkMail |
Dec-09-08 11:21 AM |
#10 |
 -
Do you have any idea how many states do not allow the Governor to pick? |
Winterblues |
Dec-09-08 11:06 AM |
#4 |
-
doesn't change why the senate was created... n/t |
ProdigalJunkMail |
Dec-09-08 11:20 AM |
#9 |
-
Well, originally Senators were *never* chosen directly by the people |
MathGuy |
Dec-09-08 11:41 AM |
#16 |
-
they are filled by special elections |
LynneSin |
Dec-09-08 11:05 AM |
#3 |
 -
There should be a special election even for the temporary replacement |
MathGuy |
Dec-09-08 11:14 AM |
#7 |
-
That isn't necessarily the case |
LynneSin |
Dec-09-08 11:18 AM |
#8 |
-
That doesn't seem like a perfect solution |
MathGuy |
Dec-09-08 11:22 AM |
#11 |
-
Because it's alot of hassle to hold a second election and the turnout may be way lower than expected |
LynneSin |
Dec-09-08 11:28 AM |
#12 |
 -
Elections are a hassle, and do cost money, it's true |
MathGuy |
Dec-09-08 11:30 AM |
#13 |
-
That's why we were smart in Delaware - appointed someone who doesn't want it after 2010 |
LynneSin |
Dec-09-08 11:38 AM |
#14 |
-
if the people picked the replacement- there'd be no need for another special election in 2 years... |
QuestionAll |
Dec-09-08 11:41 AM |
#15 |
-
Yes- the six-year clock could restart |
MathGuy |
Dec-09-08 01:11 PM |
#30 |
-
no- it wouldn't "restart the 6-year clock"...the original senate term would stand... |
QuestionAll |
Dec-09-08 02:21 PM |
#34 |
-
So in NY I think it would make much more sense |
MathGuy |
Dec-09-08 02:30 PM |
#35 |
-
that may be, but it's not the way the law is, so it won't happen. |
QuestionAll |
Dec-09-08 02:32 PM |
#36 |
-
What if only the sitting party held an election for the seat? |
FLyellowdog |
Dec-09-08 11:07 AM |
#5 |
 -
That's how we do things on the state and county level here in NJ. |
pabsungenis |
Dec-09-08 11:12 AM |
#6 |
 -
how would they determine who's in what party? |
QuestionAll |
Dec-09-08 11:43 AM |
#18 |
-
Didn't know that. In FL we register by party. |
FLyellowdog |
Dec-09-08 11:59 AM |
#20 |
-
Correction: They should not be allowed to auction-off Senate seats. |
rucky |
Dec-09-08 11:41 AM |
#17 |
-
I will defer to states' rights on this one. It should be a matter for the people of each state |
kestrel91316 |
Dec-09-08 11:54 AM |
#19 |
 -
Oh no! |
MathGuy |
Dec-09-08 12:02 PM |
#21 |
-
Look up the origins of the Seventeenth Amendment........ |
suston96 |
Dec-09-08 12:35 PM |
#22 |
 -
That's a good amendment |
MathGuy |
Dec-09-08 12:41 PM |
#23 |
-
Yep. Great. The part that bothers me........ |
suston96 |
Dec-09-08 12:55 PM |
#24 |
-
The Constitution is an excellent document |
MathGuy |
Dec-09-08 01:04 PM |
#26 |
-
Here in Wyoming |
TransitJohn |
Dec-09-08 01:15 PM |
#32 |
-
Different states have their own rules, but the Constitution says the Guv appoints them |
Bucky |
Dec-09-08 12:58 PM |
#25 |
 -
As suston96 pointed out |
MathGuy |
Dec-09-08 01:06 PM |
#28 |
-
apparently, Sen. Durbin agrees. |
rucky |
Dec-09-08 01:06 PM |
#27 |
 -
Well, it would be an absolute disgrace for Blago to make the appointment now |
MathGuy |
Dec-09-08 01:07 PM |
#29 |
-
my suggestion: a temporary appointment followed by a special election |
onenote |
Dec-09-08 01:14 PM |
#31 |
-
We have to hope, then... |
Orsino |
Dec-09-08 01:52 PM |
#33 |
-
The amended Constitution actually requires states to fill vacant senate seats by election: |
struggle4progress |
Dec-09-08 06:07 PM |
#37 |