You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: They're right, but there's an easy fix where she takes pay at the level from where she raised it. nt [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. They're right, but there's an easy fix where she takes pay at the level from where she raised it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Judicial Watch Announces Hillary Clinton Constitutionally Ineligible to Serve as Secretary of State Popol Vuh  Dec-06-08 01:22 PM   #0 
  - Isn't Judicial Watch a right wing site masquerading as a public interest group?  sfexpat2000   Dec-06-08 01:26 PM   #1 
  - Yes -- they are a RABIDLY RW group that is NOT a legit public interest group  LostinVA   Dec-06-08 01:30 PM   #4 
  - I can see how they would fool people, though. You have to look closely  sfexpat2000   Dec-06-08 01:31 PM   #8 
  - Then you must be saying that the Constitution isn't allowed as a source on DU  Popol Vuh   Dec-06-08 01:33 PM   #11 
     - So, Jimmy Carter didn't care about the Constitution when he applied the "Saxbe fix"?  PeaceNikki   Dec-06-08 01:40 PM   #14 
     - No, nor did Bill Clinton  LostinVA   Dec-06-08 01:42 PM   #16 
     - Well, of course HE didn't.  PeaceNikki   Dec-06-08 01:43 PM   # 
        - That's a given  LostinVA   Dec-06-08 01:46 PM   #20 
           - This drives me nuts.  PeaceNikki   Dec-06-08 01:50 PM   #22 
              - Haruka and I were talking about that the other day  LostinVA   Dec-06-08 02:00 PM   #30 
     - Does name or party affiliation make a difference  Popol Vuh   Dec-06-08 01:49 PM   #21 
        - This does not "go against the Constitution", Einstein.  PeaceNikki   Dec-06-08 01:51 PM   #23 
     - No, I'm just intelligent enough to know about the history of that Article  LostinVA   Dec-06-08 01:42 PM   #15 
  - I do recall it was Judicial Watch who was fighting Cheney  Popol Vuh   Dec-06-08 01:31 PM   #7 
     - Not at all. I have no dog in this fight.  sfexpat2000   Dec-06-08 01:33 PM   #9 
     - Oh, I agree -- SFPAT is a rabidly HRC supporter  LostinVA   Dec-06-08 01:33 PM   #10 
  - I wonder if people here will post notices from Judicial Watch  tritsofme   Dec-06-08 01:26 PM   #2 
  - From their Wiki entry:  sfexpat2000   Dec-06-08 01:29 PM   #3 
  - They're right, but there's an easy fix where she takes pay at the level from where she raised it. nt  w4rma   Dec-06-08 01:31 PM   #5 
  - That's exactly what I heard.  OmmmSweetOmmm   Dec-06-08 01:36 PM   #13 
     - "Saxbe Fix" it's a bipartisan-approved "tool" used since 1909  LostinVA   Dec-06-08 01:43 PM   #17 
        - I get SOOOO MUCH valuable information here at DU!  pnorman   Dec-06-08 02:08 PM   #36 
  - Hey, guess what!!  PeaceNikki   Dec-06-08 01:31 PM   #6 
  - Is that what they intended  droidamus2   Dec-06-08 01:34 PM   #12 
  - Yup, for that reason and to prevent someone from creating a new post for themself  LostinVA   Dec-06-08 01:44 PM   #18 
  - What I want to know - Has she produced her 'REAL' Birth Certificate yet ?  Trajan   Dec-06-08 01:44 PM   #19 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-06-08 01:55 PM   #24 
  - ... says the guy linking to RW hack sites propagating RW talking points.  PeaceNikki   Dec-06-08 01:58 PM   #26 
  - You'll have to include yourself in that group as when I pointed out  sfexpat2000   Dec-06-08 01:59 PM   #28 
     - Citing the constitution is biased? Ok whatever  Popol Vuh   Dec-06-08 02:06 PM   #32 
        - Hermanito, you must have me confused with another poster.  sfexpat2000   Dec-06-08 02:07 PM   #34 
        - Except you didn't cite the Constitution.  PeaceNikki   Dec-06-08 02:07 PM   #35 
        - Sfexpat and I disagree about a lot, but I ahve NEVER seen her post a racist post  LostinVA   Dec-06-08 02:09 PM   #37 
  - Obama? Obama is CFR (Council on Foreign Relations)  Popol Vuh   Dec-06-08 01:57 PM   #25 
  - okay...  anonymous171   Dec-06-08 01:58 PM   #27 
  - Can I kindly ask you not to post things from Judicial Watch here on DU?  thewiseguy   Dec-06-08 02:00 PM   #29 
  - I don't get the corruption...  NutmegYankee   Dec-06-08 02:03 PM   #31 
  - Pretty sure PROFESSOR OBAMA knows his Constitutional Law n/t  emulatorloo   Dec-06-08 02:07 PM   #33 
  - Poster is no longer with us.  pinto   Dec-06-08 02:10 PM   #38 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC