You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: Yes and Menards would have been LIABLE [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yes and Menards would have been LIABLE
if anyone was crushed to death on line.

Just because some businesses are irresponsible in dealing with crowd control issues it doesnt mean they arent liable when someone gets hurt.

I get additional insurance and security and have dealt with crowds from 500 to 3000 in malls, never have I had an incident. Just because wal mart is too cheap to pony up a few extra bucks for security it doesnt mean they arent liable for being irresponsible in protecting both their customers and employees from a crush of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC