You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #15: My mother taught me about Coughlin -- and a whole lot more [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
15. My mother taught me about Coughlin -- and a whole lot more
My mother was no good at traditional bedtime stories, so she would put me to sleep by telling me about the history of the 1920's and 30's as she remembered it. She was 16 when Roosevelt was elected and had been thinking about becoming a communist (except that she balked at the part about getting up early on Sunday mornings to sell the Daily Worker on street corners), but Roosevelt won her over.

So she would tell me stories about the New Deal, and the terrible, terrible names people used to call Eleanor Roosevelt, and how she cried when the NRA was struck down by the Supreme Court. And she would tell me about how the German Bund used to hold rallies and about how Father Coughlin would get the haters whipped up with his radio show.

She also told me about reading George Seldes to find out the stuff the New York Times was suppressing because they didn't want to get their advertisers annoyed. For example, during the Spanish Civil War, the Times would always point out that the Loyalists were backed by the Soviet Union but never mentioned that Franco's forces were supported by fascist Italy and Nazi Germany.

There may have been something like 13 daily papers in New York City in those days, but you still had to go to someone like George Seldes to learn the truth. My father told me just a couple of years ago that during the McCarthy era he and my mother were terrified that the House Un-American Activities Committee would get their hands on the mailing list for Seldes' newsletter and they'd be in real trouble.

That never happened, but I sometimes think it may explain why I tend to be on the tinfoil side of things today. The early 50's were a pretty nutsy time to be a little kid, especially since none of the grownups ever talked about this stuff to you directly.

The left in this country has a long, sad history of persecution and resistance, running from the Haymarket Riot through Cointelpro, but very few of us have ever learned more than snatches of it. I keep thinking it's time to reclaim that history and remind ourselves of who our real heroes are.

Actually, things being what they are, it might not hurt to start with a little of the history of the UAW:

The leadership of the UAW knew that if the automobile industry was to be organized, General Motors would have to be organized. On December 28, 1936, workers struck the Cleveland Fisher Body plant, a key plant which supplied the tops for nearly all GM cars. On December 30, 1936, at Flint Fisher Body, GM tried to move important dies to weaker union areas, but the Flint workers went on a sit-down strike. This was the action that triggered the General Motors sit-down strike of 1937. Within a few days, workers from other GM plants all over the country struck. By January 13, 1937, over 112,000 of the companys 150,000 production workers were on strike.

The UAW made eight demands, one of which was to recognize the UAW as the sole bargaining representative. General Motors refused to consider any of the demands and took their case to court. They obtained an injunction ordering the strikers out of the plants. When it was discovered that the issuing judge owned a large amount of General Motors stock, the writ became unenforceable. Then it was decided to starve out the Flint sit-downers. This effort precipitated a battle between police and women, who had each day for almost a month brought food to their men and were determined that they should not be stopped. The police started shooting tear gas through the windows while the women were passing food to their men. The men inside the plant started to fight back with water from heavy fire hoses and steel hinges. At one point, police were firing point blank into the crowd that included women. Union sympathizers retaliated with stones, lumps of coal, steel hinges, and milk bottles. The strikers held their ground. The wind changed direction and blew the tear gas back into the police and after two hours the police retreated.

This conflict, in which 14 fell from gunshot wounds, was later called The Battle of Bulls Run. After this conflict, each day rumors that Governor Murphy had ordered the troops to clear the plants were circulated. Each day proved the rumors were wrong but the Governor was under much pressure to send in troops. In a telegram to Governor Murphy, the sit-downers told the Governor they had decided to stay in the plant and if this resulted in an attempt to eject them, their deaths would be his responsibility.

Brothers Walter, Roy, and Victor Reuther were all union leaders that helped facilitate these sit-down strikes. Finally, on February 11, 1937, a one-page contract was agreed upon by GM and the UAW. Without the help of President Roosevelt and the cooperation of Governor Murphy, there would have been more bloodshed and we would not have had a union at General Motors. After General Motors surrendered, the rest of the auto industry was soon to follow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Ok time for some mythj killing regarding FDR, the media nadinbrzezinski  Nov-24-08 11:28 PM   #0 
  - K&R.  anonymous171   Nov-24-08 11:32 PM   #1 
  - Lots of good info.  BrklynLiberal   Nov-24-08 11:33 PM   #2 
  - Corrected that, after you posted  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-24-08 11:36 PM   #3 
     - It's almost impossible to exaggerate the degree of overt anti-Semitism prevalent then.  pnorman   Nov-25-08 10:01 AM   #17 
        - I expect the same to happen in four years  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-25-08 08:58 PM   #25 
           - But let us all HOPE for the sake of this country & world, that 2012 plays out like 1936 did!  pnorman   Nov-26-08 03:52 PM   #39 
  - Great info and analysis, Thank You - NT  Dragonfli   Nov-24-08 11:39 PM   #4 
  - You welcome... The parallels are just astoundiung  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-24-08 11:40 PM   #5 
     - History is one of our most important tools  Dragonfli   Nov-24-08 11:48 PM   #7 
        - There are a myriad of books on the subject  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-24-08 11:50 PM   #8 
           - I have been working on the self education thing since I was 16  Dragonfli   Nov-25-08 12:05 AM   #13 
              - hmm book, hmmm I have not read the actual historiography  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-25-08 08:59 PM   #26 
              - Thank You :-) NT  Dragonfli   Nov-25-08 09:10 PM   #32 
              - Just for fun, you could try "It Can't Happen Here" by Sinclair Lewis.  Doremus   Nov-25-08 11:17 PM   #37 
                 - Now you've done it... will have to download it  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-26-08 11:17 PM   #41 
                 - I have heard many references over the years to that one.  Dragonfli   Nov-27-08 12:22 PM   #54 
  - The Fair Labor Standards Act didn't come until 1938  bluestateguy   Nov-24-08 11:45 PM   #6 
  - I know, but I will also argue that the people back then  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-24-08 11:52 PM   #11 
  - and then things changed....  Two Americas   Nov-24-08 11:51 PM   #9 
  - First, there was more diversity of voices then.  Radical Activist   Nov-24-08 11:52 PM   #10 
  - First we have the same diversity, just not in old media  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-25-08 12:02 AM   #12 
  - Just because  Radical Activist   Nov-25-08 11:25 AM   #18 
     - I mever sad he was a marxist,  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-25-08 08:55 PM   #24 
        - What planet are you on?  Radical Activist   Nov-26-08 01:53 AM   #38 
           - He is not, read his legislative record... if you cannot read his record  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-26-08 11:16 PM   #40 
              - I'm very familiar with his record.  Radical Activist   Nov-26-08 11:35 PM   #42 
                 - Yeah he gets high numbers from some groups... all politicos do  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-26-08 11:40 PM   #43 
                    - There it is. The fatalistic cynicism.  Radical Activist   Nov-27-08 12:02 AM   #44 
                       - No, it is a political reality  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-27-08 12:20 AM   #45 
                          - FDR is considered one of the most liberal Presidents in history.  Radical Activist   Nov-27-08 12:47 AM   #46 
                             - What part of I can distinguish between GOVERNOR  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-27-08 01:00 AM   #47 
                                - Your FDR red herring aside  Radical Activist   Nov-27-08 01:07 AM   #48 
                                   - You can believe whatever you want, including that red herring called  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-27-08 01:10 AM   #49 
                                      - How about giving me ANY evidence?  Radical Activist   Nov-27-08 01:17 AM   #50 
                                         - His legislative HISTORY  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-27-08 01:27 AM   #51 
  - more importantly  Two Americas   Nov-25-08 12:48 PM   #21 
  - What's missing today is the strong labor/left movements of the time  leftstreet   Nov-25-08 12:14 AM   #14 
  - exactly  Two Americas   Nov-25-08 12:51 PM   #22 
  - Correct., as one of my profs put it, to save capitalism from itself  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-25-08 09:00 PM   #27 
  - My mother taught me about Coughlin -- and a whole lot more  starroute   Nov-25-08 12:41 AM   #15 
  - ThanksI LOVE primary sources  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-25-08 09:02 PM   #28 
  - K&R A very good read. Thanks for this post.  JDPriestly   Nov-25-08 01:22 AM   #16 
  - raised by a system of taxation levied on the principle of ability to pay.  Winterblues   Nov-25-08 11:40 AM   #19 
  - I think this platform shows plenty of clues ....  Joe Fields   Nov-25-08 11:58 AM   #20 
  - He did not run on the New Deal, and that IS the point  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-25-08 09:06 PM   #30 
  - let's kill the myth of the "middle"  Two Americas   Nov-25-08 01:02 PM   #23 
  - Big difference. Then, in spite of a 4-wall media blitz (for that time),  greyhound1966   Nov-25-08 09:04 PM   #29 
  - They don't OWN the new Media  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-25-08 09:08 PM   #31 
     - We get news and information from the internet, but we are still a less than insignificant  greyhound1966   Nov-25-08 09:36 PM   #34 
        - Yes but also the media of the 1950s was the direct  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-25-08 10:33 PM   #36 
  - Second thread tonight with a bailout cheerleader giving history lessons.  Hannah Bell   Nov-25-08 09:17 PM   #33 
  - Who funded Coughlin, nadin?  Hannah Bell   Nov-25-08 09:51 PM   #35 
  - FDR enacted Norman Thomas' platform.  Perragrande   Nov-27-08 02:06 AM   #52 
     - I know and partly because them commies did so well in that same  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-27-08 12:01 PM   #53 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC