You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: This was on the main FR page today. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
tired Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
22. This was on the main FR page today.
Roots of Defeat: Let us study, and emulate, the Left’s online tactics

The four-year ascent of Barack Obama from state senator to president marks not just the triumph of a man, but the coming of age of a movement.

That movement belongs to liberal (or “progressive”) Democrats, who in less than a decade have remade themselves. Once respected only in academia and the news media, they have become a fighting force. They systemically digitized the means of political organization and strategy, with the ultimate goal of dominating the political system — “Crush their spirits!” was Daily Kos blogger Markos Moulitsas Zuniga’s pre-election rallying cry.

The Left’s online movement is consciously modeled after the Goldwater-and-Reagan-era conservative movement. To those trying to build the Left, the vast right-wing conspiracy was an object not of scorn, but of admiration. They studied the Right’s network of think tanks, issue groups, and talk-show hosts, looking for clues on how to push a message with brutal efficiency. They took these lessons to heart and shaped them to fit the web. Ironically, today’s Right has much to learn from them.

The Left has created not just a collection of unshaven bloggers but a machine that beat the Right at its own game.











http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2138075/posts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Citizenship 2.0 (DU mentioned) Number23  Nov-24-08 11:23 PM   #0 
  - More successful?  DireStrike   Nov-24-08 11:24 PM   #1 
  - They may be dumb as toadstools. And mentally unhinged. And illiterate  Number23   Nov-24-08 11:32 PM   #6 
     - Aren't they the ones notorious for NEVER being able to organize protests  DireStrike   Nov-24-08 11:39 PM   #10 
     - LOL A tiny smattering of Freepers is more than enough.  Number23   Nov-24-08 11:42 PM   #11 
     - Huh. You may have missed their internet EPIC FAIL.  MPK   Nov-24-08 11:45 PM   #12 
     - That's because Freepers are, by definition, a Flock O' Frightened Followers  SpiralHawk   Nov-25-08 07:37 AM   #19 
  - FR preceded DU?  BrklynLiberal   Nov-24-08 11:26 PM   #2 
  - Heck yeah  Number23   Nov-24-08 11:28 PM   #3 
  - "less powerful architecture"? Which board is easier for more people to navigate and, hence,  patrice   Nov-24-08 11:30 PM   #4 
  - Which side elected a president this year? We effectively use the internet.  JDPriestly   Nov-25-08 12:04 AM   #14 
  - We are also more articulate and have better communication skils. nt  patrice   Nov-25-08 07:33 AM   #18 
  - I think FR may have a larger membership  hfojvt   Nov-25-08 04:53 PM   #28 
  - Yeah, but everyone knows men on DU have the largest members of them all.  HypnoToad   Nov-25-08 05:09 PM   #31 
  - I've read both forums and I too am baffled by "less powerful architecture".  HypnoToad   Nov-25-08 05:08 PM   #30 
  - HAHAHAHA!!!!  Swamp Rat   Nov-24-08 11:30 PM   # 
  - Less Powerful Architecture?  Dragonfli   Nov-24-08 11:30 PM   #5 
  - The part about the "less powerful architecture" made no sense to me either  Number23   Nov-24-08 11:36 PM   #8 
     - I think it's this bit she means:  muriel_volestrangler   Nov-25-08 05:49 AM   #16 
        - Thanks for that, Muriel  Number23   Nov-25-08 04:03 PM   #23 
  - Is she smoking crack. Unless she's saying that the libertarian ideology makes for cheap and easy...  JVS   Nov-24-08 11:34 PM   #7 
  - "less powerful architecture?" WTF?  Triana   Nov-24-08 11:38 PM   #9 
  - #2. Less powerful architecture?! WTF is THAT supposed to mean??  nc4bo   Nov-25-08 07:17 AM   #17 
     - It's butt-ugly. Between the piss-poor design and the illiteracy, it's damn near impossible ...  Triana   Nov-25-08 09:32 AM   #20 
  - Move-On puts things to a vote. I don't think it is that top-down.  JDPriestly   Nov-25-08 12:02 AM   #13 
  - Bear in mind that this is the same Danielle Allen  Number23   Nov-25-08 01:27 AM   #15 
     - At least they've (the lame$tream media) publicized where the LIES came from...  Triana   Nov-25-08 09:37 AM   #21 
  - This was on the main FR page today.  tired   Nov-25-08 09:56 AM   #22 
  - Wow. That's alot of truth wrapped up in alot of breathless paranoia.  Number23   Nov-25-08 04:10 PM   #24 
  - Some sound points, some Alice-in-Wonderlandy stuff.  bemildred   Nov-25-08 04:22 PM   #25 
  - Interesting  Number23   Nov-25-08 04:46 PM   #27 
     - A matter of emphasis, it seems to me.  bemildred   Nov-25-08 05:07 PM   #29 
        - Right  Number23   Nov-25-08 05:48 PM   #32 
           - I have no problem with that.  bemildred   Nov-25-08 06:01 PM   #33 
  - pure fucking speculation  DS1   Nov-25-08 04:31 PM   #26 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC