You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #334: This is the last time I am engaging with you.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Liberal OIF Vet Donating Member (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #318
334. This is the last time I am engaging with you....
From here on out we agree to disagree. You are assuming one shooter and 3 shots. I am assuming multiple shooters and 4-6 shots (which numerous witnesses attested too). So there is no way we are going to agree on this. The Parkland doctors (emergency room doctors) stated that the throat wound was an entrance wound. They were the first responders. Why would anyone discount their initial prognosis? They had absolutely zero reason to lie. Point blank, if they are correct (and I believe they were) an entrance wound to the throat equals more than one shooter which equals more than three shots which equals conspiracy.

Now the initial report of the shot to JFK's back was way too low for the throat to be an exit wound (according to initial reports). So assuming your assumption that CE 399 was the back wound, it had to ricochet out of his throat, no? Meaning it would have to had hit bone, no? If so, CE 399 would have had a lot more damage. A LOT MORE.

Was Oswald a shooter? Maybe. Taking into account his previous poor marksmanship ability, I assume the first shot (which missed) was him. Hell, maybe CE 399 was his (doubt it, but feasible). So there is my theory. I will not engage you anymore. I think your theory is shit and you think mine is. So leave it as that.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC