You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #83: Great! Thank you. Here's the excerpt [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #62
83. Great! Thank you. Here's the excerpt
Edited on Sat Nov-22-08 07:29 PM by RufusTFirefly

...
I was surprised to hear O'Donnell say that he was sure he had heard two shots that came from behind the fence.
"That's not what you told the Warren Commission," I said.
"You're right," he replied. "I told the FBI what I had heard, but they said it couldn't have happened that way and that I must have been imagining things. So I testified the way they wanted me to. I just didn't want to stir up any more pain and trouble for the family."
...
Dave Powers was with us at dinner that night, and his recollection of the shots was the same as O'Donnell's. Kenny O'Donnell is no longer alive, but during the writing of this book I checked with Dave Powers. As they say in the news business, he stands by his story.
...


The snipping wasn't deceptive. I simply truncated the excerpt so as not to violate any copyright. The whole excerpt is reprinted here.

By the way, this excerpt brings up a crucial point about the cover-up that is frequently overlooked. Quite a few people kept quiet for reasons they felt were noble. Some claimed to be sparing the Kennedy family for further pain. Remember, also, that this was the midst of the Cold War. There was a deliberate effort to implicate either Cuba or the Soviets in the plot. Assuming you bought this lie, consider its ramifications. Some may have mistakenly felt that accepting the idea of a lone nut instead of a calculated plot by an enemy country would literally save the world from nuclear annihilation. In addition, witnesses who were members of the military felt they were "following orders" by keeping silent.

Of course, there were almost certainly others who feared that telling the truth would endanger either their reputations or their lives. Others, like Abraham Bolden and Ralph Yates, were imprisoned or institutionalized when they tried to be whistle blowers.

The point is that skeptics of a JFK conspiracy frequently zero in on the implausibility of so many people keeping silent. But when you combine all the possible motivations for silence, it's entirely plausible.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC