ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-21-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 19. I far prefer a Chicken-gizzard bomb to one that relies on sub-atomic particles |
| -e=mc2: 103 years later, Einstein's proven right |
IWantAnyDem |
Nov-21-08 10:20 AM |
#0 |
 -
We shall now pause for one of those Neo-style "Whoa" moments |
derby378 |
Nov-21-08 10:23 AM |
#1 |
| -
I Would Agree That Splitting Protons |
ribofunk |
Nov-21-08 10:39 AM |
#2 |
 -
you could be right |
IWantAnyDem |
Nov-21-08 10:45 AM |
#5 |
 -
Part Of Your Concern Is Solid |
ProfessorGAC |
Nov-21-08 10:45 AM |
#6 |
| -
Ah, OK, |
ribofunk |
Nov-21-08 11:34 AM |
#13 |
| -
Isn't That The Whole Issue? |
ProfessorGAC |
Nov-21-08 12:35 PM |
#15 |
| -
But the revelation that the mass of the quarks and gluons is only 5% |
IWantAnyDem |
Nov-21-08 12:54 PM |
#16 |
| -
No Argument |
ProfessorGAC |
Nov-21-08 01:05 PM |
#17 |
| -
And that is precisely the problem |
IWantAnyDem |
Nov-21-08 01:15 PM |
#18 |
| -
Again, We Agree |
ProfessorGAC |
Nov-21-08 06:18 PM |
#28 |
| -
I thought quarks cannot exist outside hadrons |
muriel_volestrangler |
Nov-21-08 10:41 AM |
#3 |
| -
We should know within a few years |
IWantAnyDem |
Nov-21-08 10:43 AM |
#4 |
| -
That's What I Said! |
ProfessorGAC |
Nov-21-08 10:47 AM |
#7 |
| -
Would these be high energy photons? |
chaplainM |
Nov-21-08 11:07 AM |
#9 |
| -
There Are Some Problems With That |
ProfessorGAC |
Nov-21-08 11:10 AM |
#10 |
| -
Proton Bomb - has a nice ring to it |
Paint It Black |
Nov-21-08 11:04 AM |
#8 |
| -
that would only be possible if a chain reaction were possible |
IWantAnyDem |
Nov-21-08 11:10 AM |
#11 |
| -
Maybe with the Alchemist? |
BB1 |
Nov-21-08 11:57 AM |
#14 |
| -
Hey, Luke Skywalker took out the Death Star with a proton torpedo |
derby378 |
Nov-21-08 11:33 AM |
#12 |
| -
I was the geek who said 'Bullshit' out loud when I first saw Star Wars |
riqster |
Nov-21-08 01:20 PM |
#21 |
| -
Not to mention sound in a vacumn :) - n/t |
coalition_unwilling |
Nov-21-08 01:44 PM |
#25 |
| -
Oh yeah! |
riqster |
Nov-21-08 01:47 PM |
#26 |
| -
The soundtrack is the unsung hero in |
coalition_unwilling |
Nov-22-08 08:05 AM |
#29 |
| -
Agreed on all counts |
riqster |
Nov-22-08 09:04 AM |
#31 |
| -
Well to bring this Star Wars sub-thread full circle, do you think |
coalition_unwilling |
Nov-23-08 10:28 PM |
#34 |
| -
Einstein was noted for his spirit of fun at times |
riqster |
Nov-24-08 07:14 AM |
#37 |
| -
Thanks for the rec. Wil try to see if I can score it soon - n/t |
coalition_unwilling |
Nov-25-08 01:08 PM |
#38 |
| -
I far prefer a Chicken-gizzard bomb to one that relies on sub-atomic particles |
ThomWV |
Nov-21-08 01:18 PM |
#19 |
| -
Quarks shot the sheriff: Gluons shot the deputy |
Fuzz |
Nov-21-08 01:19 PM |
#20 |
| -
SherriffJohn Brown always hated Physics class |
riqster |
Nov-21-08 01:21 PM |
#22 |
| -
Every time I'd plane a ramp he'd kill it before it goed. |
Catshrink |
Nov-22-08 08:11 AM |
#30 |
| -
THAT one must have taken some thinking! |
riqster |
Nov-22-08 09:06 AM |
#32 |
| -
I was actually listening to some Clapton on the drive home yesterday |
Catshrink |
Nov-22-08 09:22 AM |
#33 |
| -
And in another 300 years, the Vatican might agree. Maybe. |
foxfeet |
Nov-21-08 01:23 PM |
#23 |
| -
But the fringe fundamentalist protestants will claim it's all a fraud |
IWantAnyDem |
Nov-21-08 01:24 PM |
#24 |
| -
300 years? You're far too generous |
slutticus |
Nov-21-08 02:15 PM |
#27 |
| -
problem, the energy would just change into new quarks, making new Hadrons |
Odin2005 |
Nov-24-08 12:00 AM |
#35 |
| -
It's going to be fusion in the futre anyway, no? |
bluedawg12 |
Nov-24-08 12:57 AM |
#36 |
| -
Albert Einstein explains mass- energy equivalence in 57 seconds |
NNN0LHI |
Nov-25-08 01:13 PM |
#39 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread