whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-19-07 07:28 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Tuesday morning Bush claim executive privilege and by Thursday |
|
...he'll order attacks on Iran
|
| -The Looming Constitutional Crisis..... is Here |
cali |
Mar-19-07 07:20 AM |
#0 |
-
Next stop, US Supreme Court? If that happens, I hope the process can |
babylonsister |
Mar-19-07 07:26 AM |
#1 |
 -
US Supreme Court approved of Bush giving finger to Congress over Energy task force n/t |
papau |
Mar-19-07 07:28 AM |
#3 |
-
Not quite |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-19-07 08:16 AM |
#16 |
-
Not quite - and the take away is that the USSC will go yes to executive privilege- but I love Scalia |
papau |
Mar-19-07 05:55 PM |
#34 |
-
oh, I agree |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-19-07 05:57 PM |
#35 |
-
Tuesday morning Bush claim executive privilege and by Thursday |
whistle |
Mar-19-07 07:28 AM |
#2 |
-
Actually |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-19-07 07:28 AM |
#4 |
 -
Well, it appears Waxman disagrees with you |
cali |
Mar-19-07 07:39 AM |
#7 |
  -
Not entirely |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-19-07 07:42 AM |
#8 |
 -
Well then it is time to make precedent... |
dogday |
Mar-19-07 08:19 AM |
#17 |
  -
No |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-19-07 08:21 AM |
#18 |
 -
We are talking about many crimes committed by |
dogday |
Mar-19-07 08:25 AM |
#19 |
 -
If by precedent |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-19-07 08:28 AM |
#20 |
 -
You know any other time, I would have to agree |
dogday |
Mar-19-07 08:33 AM |
#22 |
  -
I don't know... |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-19-07 08:35 AM |
#24 |
 -
Yet the SCOTUS had no problems with their unprecedented |
Horse with no Name |
Mar-19-07 09:34 AM |
#26 |
 -
Exactly! That's why I don't trust what they will do in THIS case. |
in_cog_ni_to |
Mar-19-07 06:18 PM |
#38 |
 -
That's the key. |
H2O Man |
Mar-19-07 11:56 AM |
#27 |
 -
I hope you're right - but I expect any testimony - if offered - will not be under oath. n/t |
papau |
Mar-19-07 05:59 PM |
#36 |
 -
This am, on NPR, someone said he'll aggree to a very narrow list of |
jazzjunkysue |
Mar-19-07 07:45 AM |
#10 |
-
Yep |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-19-07 07:47 AM |
#12 |
-
I actually think Senator Leahy |
cali |
Mar-19-07 07:56 AM |
#13 |
-
He should be |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-19-07 07:59 AM |
#14 |
-
When any of them refuse to testify under oath to congress, |
mmonk |
Mar-19-07 07:29 AM |
#5 |
-
Then Tony Snow can explain how this shows the President "wants to know" the full truth. |
WinkyDink |
Mar-19-07 07:33 AM |
#6 |
-
Seems like they can send the Capitol police to pick Rove up and |
BR_Parkway |
Mar-19-07 07:44 AM |
#9 |
 -
No they can't do that |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-19-07 07:46 AM |
#11 |
-
it's critical that Congress get the whole lot of them to testify under oath . . . |
OneBlueSky |
Mar-19-07 08:00 AM |
#15 |
-
We need a special proescutor to determine if this was obstruction of justice. |
Perky |
Mar-19-07 08:33 AM |
#21 |
 -
I agree |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-19-07 08:34 AM |
#23 |
-
Good!! Let the feuding begin. It is time for Congress............ |
Double T |
Mar-19-07 09:18 AM |
#25 |
-
I may be dumb and naive but |
PRETZEL |
Mar-19-07 12:13 PM |
#28 |
 -
My understanding is completely different than yours |
cali |
Mar-19-07 12:26 PM |
#29 |
-
That's part of the confusion |
PRETZEL |
Mar-19-07 12:58 PM |
#30 |
-
that is what I thought too |
mdmc |
Mar-19-07 01:29 PM |
#33 |
-
Ah yes, flashbacks to Watergate |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-19-07 01:00 PM |
#31 |
-
Oh I forgot Popcorn, get your fresh toased popcorn |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-19-07 01:02 PM |
#32 |
-
Refreshing, isn't it! |
Prisoner_Number_Six |
Mar-19-07 06:02 PM |
#37 |