rug
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-09-08 10:54 PM
Original message |
| Should polygamy be illegal? |
 Should polygamy be illegal? |
rug |
Nov-09-08 10:54 PM |
#0 |
 
yes. nt. |
IndianaJones |
Nov-09-08 10:55 PM |
#1 |
 
Wow. You had to edit THAT! And it took 25 minutes? |
Festivito |
Nov-11-08 10:40 AM |
#220 |
|
YES!!!!! |
Bobbieo |
Nov-09-08 10:55 PM |
#2 |
|
Why? |
yardwork |
Nov-09-08 11:09 PM |
#9 |
|
no nt |
Genevieve |
Nov-09-08 10:56 PM |
#3 |
|
I'ts got a much longer history than monogamy NT |
dmesg |
Nov-09-08 10:56 PM |
#4 |
|
No, I don't give a shit who marries whom |
Catch22Dem |
Nov-09-08 10:58 PM |
#5 |
|
this is america! why should it be an issue at all |
zoner4 |
Nov-10-08 05:29 PM |
#148 |
|
No as long s it works both ways |
azurnoir |
Nov-09-08 10:59 PM |
#6 |
|
Only if it's forced or the people being married are not of age. |
MrSlayer |
Nov-09-08 11:00 PM |
#7 |
|
I agree completely. n/t |
ObamaVision |
Nov-10-08 05:35 PM |
#150 |
|
Agreed. |
northofdenali |
Nov-10-08 09:24 PM |
#176 |
|
I agree. |
tomg |
Nov-11-08 08:51 AM |
#210 |
|
No, it should be legal as long as everyone is 18 and over and |
elshiva |
Nov-09-08 11:08 PM |
#8 |
|
Yes, unless you can get my wife to agree to it. I'm not miserable enough. |
Fuzz |
Nov-09-08 11:10 PM |
#10 |
|
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Nov-09-08 11:10 PM |
#11 |
|
No. Why should I care how many people want to be married to each other? |
TexasObserver |
Nov-09-08 11:15 PM |
#12 |
|
I think polygamy and polyandry should be legal |
Mari333 |
Nov-09-08 11:17 PM |
#13 |
|
No and most arguments against it are sexist and insulting to women. |
curse of greyface |
Nov-09-08 11:17 PM |
#14 |
|
Who said it had to be multiple wives? |
Fuzz |
Nov-09-08 11:18 PM |
#16 |
|
Nobody. |
curse of greyface |
Nov-09-08 11:22 PM |
#17 |
|
Doesn't have to be, and there's a plethora of terms |
RichardRay |
Nov-10-08 01:42 AM |
#33 |
|
. |
anigbrowl |
Nov-10-08 01:12 PM |
#119 |
|
fight fire with fire and put ont he ballot |
zoner4 |
Nov-10-08 05:28 PM |
#145 |
|
There's No Biological Basis For a Pro-Polygamy Argument |
Crisco |
Nov-10-08 08:22 AM |
#55 |
|
I doubt the people in question |
Dogtown |
Nov-10-08 08:55 AM |
#65 |
|
Absolutely, Marriage Benefits Society |
Crisco |
Nov-10-08 10:03 AM |
#83 |
|
Certainly, as a by-product |
Dogtown |
Nov-10-08 12:02 PM |
#115 |
|
The concept of marriage as a vehicle for self-fullfillment is a recent development. |
riverdeep |
Nov-11-08 01:09 AM |
#193 |
|
marriage" is an institution designed to benefit society |
cushla_machree |
Nov-10-08 03:43 PM |
#139 |
|
I'd say there is. |
dorkulon |
Nov-10-08 11:12 PM |
#183 |
|
I Beg Your Pardon? |
Crisco |
Nov-11-08 09:15 AM |
#213 |
|
Fine, then by that standard, |
dorkulon |
Nov-11-08 09:24 PM |
#230 |
|
Who Said I Was Making One? |
Crisco |
Nov-11-08 09:26 PM |
#231 |
|
D00D!!!!! |
Midlodemocrat |
Nov-09-08 11:18 PM |
#15 |
|
So, how's things with you? |
rug |
Nov-10-08 03:12 PM |
#132 |
|
No. |
DuStrange |
Nov-09-08 11:23 PM |
#18 |
|
No. |
Omnibus |
Nov-09-08 11:25 PM |
#19 |
|
Some think it's ok for a 39 - 46 year old dude to nail a few 13-14 year olds then |
Imagevision |
Nov-09-08 11:27 PM |
#20 |
|
'consenting adults' is the key phrase here. |
Warren Stupidity |
Nov-09-08 11:48 PM |
#24 |
|
The OP didn't make any such distinction. |
cherokeeprogressive |
Nov-10-08 02:12 AM |
#36 |
|
There are times when I wonder |
pipi_k |
Nov-10-08 09:34 AM |
#70 |
|
The consenting adults |
get the red out |
Nov-10-08 02:56 PM |
#126 |
|
Only if equally illegal to both sexes....My answer is a resounding NO. |
OwnedByFerrets |
Nov-09-08 11:28 PM |
#21 |
|
Isn't it already illegal? |
Liberal Gramma |
Nov-09-08 11:29 PM |
#22 |
|
Yes it is. Rendering the OP moot IMHO. n/t |
cherokeeprogressive |
Nov-10-08 02:12 AM |
#37 |
|
no of course not |
Warren Stupidity |
Nov-09-08 11:47 PM |
#23 |
|
You'd have to allow same sex marriage first in order for it to be equitable. |
Gwendolyn |
Nov-09-08 11:48 PM |
#25 |
|
"it would end up with a lot of people being owned by the few." |
SimpleTrend |
Nov-10-08 05:52 AM |
#49 |
|
There's def a parallel imho!!! |
Gwendolyn |
Nov-10-08 08:26 AM |
#56 |
|
I think what you're talking about is Polyamory. |
SimpleTrend |
Nov-10-08 11:50 PM |
#185 |
|
This concept that adult women can't make their own decisions bothers me. nt |
curse of greyface |
Nov-10-08 09:31 AM |
#69 |
|
How do you get from my post that women can't make their own decisions? |
Gwendolyn |
Nov-10-08 09:38 AM |
#72 |
|
as long as the woman keep sweet, whats the problem? |
cushla_machree |
Nov-10-08 03:53 PM |
#140 |
|
I don't understand the marriage dynamics where many are owned by a few. |
curse of greyface |
Nov-10-08 09:51 AM |
#78 |
|
I'm Sure |
Crisco |
Nov-10-08 10:17 AM |
#96 |
|
But the United states as a whole isn't a Mormon or Islamic Society. |
curse of greyface |
Nov-11-08 12:41 AM |
#188 |
|
No, the govt should get out of the business of licensing sex between adults |
FarCenter |
Nov-09-08 11:56 PM |
#26 |
|
How about serial polygamy? |
Warpy |
Nov-10-08 12:13 AM |
#27 |
|
That's called serial marriages, not poly - it's a very gop thing to do |
comtec |
Nov-10-08 06:01 AM |
#52 |
|
Most of the serial polygamists |
Warpy |
Nov-10-08 02:49 PM |
#124 |
|
Is it serial polygamy or serial monogamy? |
bananas |
Nov-10-08 09:26 PM |
#177 |
|
I'm confused by the use of the term serial |
comtec |
Nov-11-08 03:22 AM |
#201 |
|
"Serial Monogamy" is what is mostly practiced in the US |
Greyskye |
Nov-11-08 11:39 AM |
#224 |
|
While the Mormons are partly to blame for Prop 8. |
Antennas |
Nov-10-08 12:26 AM |
#28 |
|
what? nt. |
IndianaJones |
Nov-10-08 12:37 AM |
#31 |
|
I meant. |
Antennas |
Nov-10-08 02:28 AM |
#39 |
|
.... |
Husb2Sparkly |
Nov-10-08 12:27 AM |
#29 |
|
Hesitant no |
camera__obscura |
Nov-10-08 12:29 AM |
#30 |
|
Marriage is a civil, not religious, right |
Prayingforrain48 |
Nov-10-08 01:26 AM |
#32 |
|
Between consenting adults, Yes ... but not this |
sjdnb |
Nov-10-08 01:49 AM |
#34 |
|
I think someone should be able to marry as many or as few as is agreeable to all: CONSENT RULES! |
Impeachment_Monkey |
Nov-10-08 02:09 AM |
#35 |
|
Yes |
Dems4me |
Nov-10-08 02:26 AM |
#38 |
|
And two men or two women getting married-there are no legal |
lizzy |
Nov-10-08 08:48 AM |
#64 |
|
Well...a close family member of mine got married |
Dems4me |
Nov-11-08 02:56 AM |
#199 |
|
Only if it's gay polygamy. |
cboy4 |
Nov-10-08 04:41 AM |
#40 |
|
Yes, that, too! |
elshiva |
Nov-10-08 10:47 PM |
#180 |
|
This is going to get me in trouble. |
LatteLibertine |
Nov-10-08 04:44 AM |
#41 |
|
it already is. |
quantessd |
Nov-10-08 04:47 AM |
#42 |
|
The question asked is not whether polygamy is illegal. |
lizzy |
Nov-10-08 08:38 AM |
#60 |
|
The OP has succintly pointed out what loosening the tradition for gays would involve. |
riverdeep |
Nov-10-08 04:59 AM |
#43 |
|
And part of that line of thinking is what the religious right have made hay with |
Nasprin |
Nov-10-08 05:28 AM |
#46 |
|
Absolutely they used trumped up scenarios. |
riverdeep |
Nov-10-08 05:47 AM |
#48 |
|
Absolutely you are correct |
Nasprin |
Nov-10-08 05:58 AM |
#51 |
|
So what if there are three consenting adults? |
lizzy |
Nov-10-08 08:40 AM |
#61 |
|
I'm not demonizig their relationship |
Nasprin |
Nov-10-08 06:14 PM |
#161 |
|
No, It Wouldn't |
Crisco |
Nov-10-08 10:41 AM |
#102 |
|
Of course there is a biological drive for a male to sire children by multiple women |
Romulox |
Nov-10-08 05:03 PM |
#143 |
|
Likewise, Women Have Drives to Mate With Multiple Men |
Crisco |
Nov-11-08 08:35 AM |
#208 |
|
Yet there is a difference in male and female mating strategies... |
Romulox |
Nov-11-08 09:24 AM |
#214 |
|
I'm Not Rooting Gay Marriage In Biology |
Crisco |
Nov-11-08 12:03 PM |
#226 |
|
Um actually the biological drive is quite rooted in multiple mates. |
curse of greyface |
Nov-11-08 12:32 AM |
#187 |
|
Glad you stated this in neutral terms. |
riverdeep |
Nov-11-08 01:00 AM |
#191 |
|
I was well aware of the biology I'm glad you picked up on that |
curse of greyface |
Nov-11-08 01:39 AM |
#197 |
|
Um Actually I Can Be Snarky, Too and Purposefully Miss the Point |
Crisco |
Nov-11-08 09:04 AM |
#211 |
|
I'm not pro-polygamy (despite my disturbing number of responses in this thread |
curse of greyface |
Nov-11-08 01:23 PM |
#228 |
|
Okay, So ... What Are the Benefits of Polygamy, Again? |
Crisco |
Nov-11-08 09:28 PM |
#232 |
|
Already is |
mtnester |
Nov-10-08 05:18 AM |
#44 |
|
It already is. |
quantessd |
Nov-10-08 05:22 AM |
#45 |
|
The OP isn't asking if it is or it isn't. |
lizzy |
Nov-10-08 08:37 AM |
#58 |
|
No it shouldn't |
tkmorris |
Nov-10-08 05:44 AM |
#47 |
|
You better think! |
Hubert Flottz |
Nov-10-08 05:55 AM |
#50 |
|
Actually, polyandry |
shimmergal |
Nov-10-08 05:54 PM |
#158 |
|
yes |
CreekDog |
Nov-10-08 08:15 AM |
#53 |
|
Why? |
curse of greyface |
Nov-10-08 10:09 AM |
#88 |
|
because it's abusive to children and women |
CreekDog |
Nov-10-08 10:41 PM |
#179 |
|
Yes |
Crisco |
Nov-10-08 08:20 AM |
#54 |
|
So two women should be able to marry? |
lizzy |
Nov-10-08 08:43 AM |
#63 |
|
Yes it does make perfect sense. |
Gwendolyn |
Nov-10-08 09:09 AM |
#67 |
|
The "social implications" usually boil down to |
curse of greyface |
Nov-10-08 09:38 AM |
#73 |
|
That's ridiculous, and has nothing to do with anything. |
Gwendolyn |
Nov-10-08 10:07 AM |
#85 |
|
In what post did I mention sex (or restrict the genders to include females?) |
curse of greyface |
Nov-10-08 10:13 AM |
#92 |
|
This thread is getting complicated. I meant I explained it in post #67. |
Gwendolyn |
Nov-10-08 10:26 AM |
#97 |
|
Funny How People Love Going Back To That "We Can't Trust Women" |
Crisco |
Nov-10-08 10:08 AM |
#87 |
|
That's the apparent strawman argument this time around |
gollygee |
Nov-10-08 01:12 PM |
#120 |
|
No- this time social implications do indeed mean social implications |
Marrah_G |
Nov-10-08 11:04 AM |
#108 |
|
We have over a million men in jail... I'm sure that has created more of an imbalance. nt |
curse of greyface |
Nov-11-08 03:22 AM |
#200 |
|
It has created imbalance |
Marrah_G |
Nov-11-08 08:19 AM |
#207 |
|
Why? nt |
curse of greyface |
Nov-10-08 09:36 AM |
#71 |
|
Yes: Here is why. |
Marrah_G |
Nov-10-08 08:31 AM |
#57 |
|
Why would it unbalance anything? |
totodeinhere |
Nov-10-08 03:20 PM |
#135 |
|
It theoretically could |
gollygee |
Nov-10-08 05:41 PM |
#154 |
|
It's much more of a natural urge for men to want to have as many women as possible, |
Gwendolyn |
Nov-10-08 06:21 PM |
#163 |
|
Because it never happens that way |
Marrah_G |
Nov-11-08 08:49 AM |
#209 |
|
Yes |
Dorian Gray |
Nov-10-08 08:37 AM |
#59 |
|
Nope |
RadicalTexan |
Nov-10-08 08:41 AM |
#62 |
|
No |
WolverineDG |
Nov-10-08 08:56 AM |
#66 |
|
Yes. Reality amply demonstrates that women and children fare far worse in this kind of relationship |
riderinthestorm |
Nov-10-08 09:30 AM |
#68 |
|
Yes cause women are innocent and need to be protected against the big bad man. |
curse of greyface |
Nov-10-08 09:42 AM |
#76 |
|
You can peddle your theory about adult women making adult choices but that isn't the reality |
riderinthestorm |
Nov-10-08 09:49 AM |
#77 |
|
Well Hugh can't marry three woman at the same time. so he is off the hook |
curse of greyface |
Nov-10-08 09:55 AM |
#81 |
|
Look, you can spout your "theory" about the 21st century all you want |
riderinthestorm |
Nov-10-08 10:08 AM |
#86 |
|
First of all a polygamous relationship can involve three men not a woman in sight. |
curse of greyface |
Nov-10-08 10:17 AM |
#95 |
|
Name me one statistic about 3 men involved in a polygamous relationship |
riderinthestorm |
Nov-10-08 10:35 AM |
#100 |
|
IO don't think mistresses are a strawman. They are a reality. |
curse of greyface |
Nov-10-08 10:47 AM |
#103 |
|
Mistresses aren't applicable because they aren't seeking to get married to their married partner |
riderinthestorm |
Nov-10-08 10:59 AM |
#106 |
|
Do you think the wives of those mistresses want another wife? |
fed_up_mother |
Nov-10-08 01:33 PM |
#121 |
|
You keep bringing up money. You know women work outside the home nowadays. nt |
curse of greyface |
Nov-10-08 03:08 PM |
#128 |
|
Have you ever known anyone who has gotten divorced? |
gollygee |
Nov-10-08 03:10 PM |
#131 |
|
I don't disagree. But that is an argument against all marriage. |
curse of greyface |
Nov-10-08 03:14 PM |
#133 |
|
You've been given that answer in a number of posts |
gollygee |
Nov-10-08 03:16 PM |
#134 |
|
Yes, I know most women work outside the home, but the wealthy could still engage in it more |
fed_up_mother |
Nov-10-08 05:57 PM |
#159 |
|
Marriage itself is tilted toward the wealthy if stats are to be believed. |
curse of greyface |
Nov-11-08 12:42 AM |
#189 |
|
great point |
zoner4 |
Nov-10-08 05:28 PM |
#146 |
|
In the poly families I know |
conscious evolution |
Nov-10-08 06:06 PM |
#160 |
|
He lives with those women, he isn't married to them all. |
Gwendolyn |
Nov-10-08 09:51 AM |
#79 |
|
Yeah people are free to be polygamous without the burden of responsibility. |
curse of greyface |
Nov-10-08 09:57 AM |
#82 |
|
See my post #85. |
Gwendolyn |
Nov-10-08 10:10 AM |
#90 |
|
Yes! It's bad for society |
fed_up_mother |
Nov-10-08 09:39 AM |
#74 |
|
Same argument the right uses against gay marriage |
NeedleCast |
Nov-10-08 11:32 AM |
#110 |
|
Except they have nothing to back up the claim... |
Gwendolyn |
Nov-10-08 12:00 PM |
#114 |
|
Exactly. |
fed_up_mother |
Nov-10-08 01:04 PM |
#117 |
|
no. |
QuestionAll |
Nov-10-08 09:39 AM |
#75 |
|
Yes! |
peacetrain |
Nov-10-08 09:54 AM |
#80 |
|
How many countries and cultures actually "allow" polygamy? |
DuStrange |
Nov-10-08 10:15 AM |
#94 |
|
google is your friend.. start with Sudan |
peacetrain |
Nov-10-08 10:28 AM |
#98 |
|
Does Sudan allow polygamy? |
DuStrange |
Nov-10-08 10:49 AM |
#105 |
|
The same number of countries that allow gay marraige. |
SweetieD |
Nov-10-08 03:37 PM |
#138 |
|
As long as they follow other laws (no kiddie brides, no abandonment of boys, no unlawful detention) |
aikoaiko |
Nov-10-08 10:07 AM |
#84 |
|
Here or in Arab countries? |
tinrobot |
Nov-10-08 10:09 AM |
#89 |
|
Absolutely!!! |
goforit |
Nov-10-08 10:13 AM |
#91 |
|
Yes it should |
bobbert |
Nov-10-08 10:15 AM |
#93 |
|
No |
sleebarker |
Nov-10-08 10:31 AM |
#99 |
|
Nah. |
otherlander |
Nov-10-08 10:36 AM |
#101 |
|
Should people make false equations between polygamy and marriage? nt |
LaydeeBug |
Nov-10-08 10:49 AM |
#104 |
|
Absolutely. nt |
Occam Bandage |
Nov-10-08 11:00 AM |
#107 |
|
No |
NeedleCast |
Nov-10-08 11:28 AM |
#109 |
|
No.... |
Hepburn |
Nov-10-08 11:33 AM |
#111 |
|
Not Illegal, But Marriage/Insurance/Other Benefits Should Only Apply To One Spouse Legally. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Nov-10-08 11:35 AM |
#112 |
|
really all it comes down to |
zoner4 |
Nov-10-08 05:28 PM |
#147 |
|
That isn't really marriage then, is it? |
riverdeep |
Nov-11-08 01:31 AM |
#196 |
|
Comparing The Two Is Pathetic. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Nov-11-08 07:28 AM |
#203 |
|
Universl health care would take care of that problem. |
conscious evolution |
Nov-11-08 07:38 AM |
#204 |
|
Irrelevant To The Discussion. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Nov-11-08 07:48 AM |
#205 |
|
For free?What is this free coverage you speak of? |
conscious evolution |
Nov-11-08 08:04 AM |
#206 |
|
You Never Heard Of Family Coverage? |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Nov-11-08 09:26 AM |
#215 |
|
Life insurance from their jobs? |
conscious evolution |
Nov-11-08 10:23 AM |
#217 |
|
Oy Vey. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Nov-11-08 10:38 AM |
#219 |
|
I think you're arguing with someone who's never paid into a social system. It's useless. |
Gwendolyn |
Nov-11-08 10:56 AM |
#222 |
|
A social system? |
conscious evolution |
Nov-11-08 12:34 PM |
#227 |
|
Still waiting for a reply |
conscious evolution |
Nov-12-08 09:46 AM |
#236 |
|
Sorry for the delay in getting back with you. |
conscious evolution |
Nov-11-08 07:30 PM |
#229 |
|
Yes, but it should be between consenting adults and more "polyamory" than "polygamy" nt |
unpossibles |
Nov-10-08 11:46 AM |
#113 |
|
Polyamory should be illegal? |
Greyskye |
Nov-10-08 06:35 PM |
#165 |
|
oops! Not at all |
unpossibles |
Nov-10-08 11:01 PM |
#181 |
|
I thought that might be the case |
Greyskye |
Nov-11-08 11:26 AM |
#223 |
|
No. It's a civil rights issue. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Nov-10-08 12:08 PM |
#116 |
|
How does affect society as a whole? |
HypnoToad |
Nov-10-08 01:10 PM |
#118 |
|
Women become NOTHING |
get the red out |
Nov-10-08 03:00 PM |
#127 |
|
No, but marriages with children should be. |
helderheid |
Nov-10-08 01:34 PM |
#122 |
|
Any arrangement entirely involving consenting adults should be legal (nt) |
Posteritatis |
Nov-10-08 02:17 PM |
#123 |
|
Only if |
get the red out |
Nov-10-08 02:54 PM |
#125 |
|
So adult women can't be trusted to make their own decisions? nt |
curse of greyface |
Nov-10-08 03:10 PM |
#129 |
|
So polygamy would be okay with you if it involved same sex unions? no women involved? |
SweetieD |
Nov-10-08 03:21 PM |
#137 |
|
no |
SweetieD |
Nov-10-08 03:10 PM |
#130 |
|
No, I believe adults should be free to make their own life decisions. |
20score |
Nov-10-08 03:21 PM |
#136 |
|
ok then |
cushla_machree |
Nov-10-08 03:56 PM |
#141 |
|
That situation involved the workings of a cult, not polygamy by itself. |
SweetieD |
Nov-10-08 03:58 PM |
#142 |
|
In this country |
cushla_machree |
Nov-10-08 06:18 PM |
#162 |
|
Still believe in freedom. Anyone can find anecdotal evidence for what they want to prove. |
20score |
Nov-10-08 08:40 PM |
#168 |
|
She was FORCED into a marriage. That can happen in monogamous marriage too. |
mondo joe |
Nov-11-08 10:42 AM |
#221 |
|
lets put tha ton the ballot! |
zoner4 |
Nov-10-08 05:27 PM |
#144 |
|
are you trying to imply that gay marriage is a wedge that will open the door to "anything goes?" NT |
happychatter |
Nov-10-08 05:34 PM |
#149 |
|
No. Just hypocricy. |
rucky |
Nov-10-08 05:37 PM |
#151 |
|
Not unless the Parties are underage. I think one should be able to marry whomever, however, how many |
AzDar |
Nov-10-08 05:37 PM |
#152 |
|
I don't think so. I could never share MY spouse though. |
jesus_of_suburbia |
Nov-10-08 05:38 PM |
#153 |
|
this place has gotten entirely too crazy, with lots of one sided and mean spirited vitriol |
happychatter |
Nov-10-08 05:46 PM |
#155 |
|
Yes, because... |
tunacan |
Nov-10-08 05:51 PM |
#156 |
|
no! nt |
wildbilln864 |
Nov-10-08 05:52 PM |
#157 |
|
If you call it Polyamory: No. Nein. Nyet. Never. |
Greyskye |
Nov-10-08 06:34 PM |
#164 |
|
Yes |
LiberalPersona |
Nov-10-08 06:46 PM |
#166 |
|
All relationship structures between consenting adults should be legal. |
LynzM |
Nov-10-08 07:27 PM |
#167 |
|
The way *THOSE* freaks do it, yes. For 'normal' people, no. |
Edweird |
Nov-10-08 08:49 PM |
#169 |
|
Only if YOU'RE involved. |
Blue-Jay |
Nov-10-08 08:53 PM |
#170 |
|
. |
rug |
Nov-10-08 08:55 PM |
#171 |
|
Yep |
JustAnotherGen |
Nov-10-08 08:57 PM |
#172 |
|
No. |
bananas |
Nov-10-08 09:21 PM |
#173 |
|
As should polyandry |
dpbrown |
Nov-10-08 09:21 PM |
#174 |
|
Trigonometry should be illegal. |
sellitman |
Nov-10-08 09:23 PM |
#175 |
|
I prefer polyandry myself... |
BrklynLiberal |
Nov-10-08 09:33 PM |
#178 |
|
No, as long as everyone is of age and consents of free will. |
dorkulon |
Nov-10-08 11:10 PM |
#182 |
|
I don't care one way or another |
Generic Brad |
Nov-10-08 11:19 PM |
#184 |
|
I just googled the pros and cons. Among the cons: |
Truth Hurts A Lot |
Nov-10-08 11:55 PM |
#186 |
|
Stercus pro cerebo habes. s/n. |
apocalypsehow |
Nov-11-08 12:53 AM |
#190 |
|
That wasn't nice, but you may have given a few priests a laugh. |
20score |
Nov-11-08 01:03 AM |
#192 |
|
Closest I could come to approximating modern DU "no text" - "scribo nihilum." n/t. |
apocalypsehow |
Nov-11-08 01:19 AM |
#194 |
|
Yes. If you advocated polygamy and advocated gay marriage, you would never get anyone elected. |
ArrowMan |
Nov-11-08 01:25 AM |
#195 |
|
No. Consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want |
Indenturedebtor |
Nov-11-08 01:39 AM |
#198 |
|
... |
Jamastiene |
Nov-11-08 04:15 AM |
#202 |
|
I don't care. But if it is made legal, there are going to be some complicated |
renie408 |
Nov-11-08 09:09 AM |
#212 |
|
My cousin, Tommy, has two wives and they have been married for over 25 years now |
Bryn |
Nov-11-08 10:08 AM |
#216 |
|
What State Did Tommy Get Married In? |
Crisco |
Nov-11-08 09:30 PM |
#233 |
|
I just assumed they married in Tallahassee, Florida |
Bryn |
Nov-11-08 10:40 PM |
#235 |
|
I don't care about polygamy, or what consenting adults choose to do. The legal aspect is |
mondo joe |
Nov-11-08 10:26 AM |
#218 |
|
Republicans would just use it to marry more beards |
yurbud |
Nov-11-08 11:42 AM |
#225 |
|
Yes. So should |
ForrestGump |
Nov-11-08 09:56 PM |
#234 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
