libnnc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
| 45. if my partner and I went to MA to get married and then came back down to NC |
|
our union would not be recognized by NC
|
| -What rights do gay, committed couples not have in California that married folks do? |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 03:55 PM |
#0 |
-
They Cannot Marry |
zorahopkins |
Nov-09-08 03:58 PM |
#1 |
 -
But a domestic partnership gives them the exact same benefits, right? nt |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 03:59 PM |
#2 |
-
No, They Cannot |
zorahopkins |
Nov-09-08 04:00 PM |
#4 |
-
Like I said, I'm not arguing that the certificate isn't important... |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:02 PM |
#7 |
-
Google is your friend |
Ellen Forradalom |
Nov-09-08 03:59 PM |
#3 |
 -
So is wikipedia: |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:01 PM |
#5 |
-
For not trying |
Ellen Forradalom |
Nov-09-08 04:05 PM |
#12 |
-
Over 500 federal rights that straight married people have |
ruggerson |
Nov-09-08 04:01 PM |
#6 |
 -
Those are federal rights that have nothing to do with Prop 8, correct? |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:02 PM |
#8 |
  -
Straight married couples have those rights now |
ruggerson |
Nov-09-08 04:12 PM |
#31 |
 -
Also, a civil union ends at the state line.. |
PennyP |
Nov-09-08 04:04 PM |
#10 |
-
But if marriage would be allowed in California... |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:07 PM |
#16 |
-
States do NOT HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THIER UNION |
libnnc |
Nov-09-08 04:08 PM |
#20 |
-
outline for me the difference between the water in the colored and white fountains. nt. |
IndianaJones |
Nov-09-08 04:04 PM |
#9 |
 -
Jesus Christ... |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:05 PM |
#13 |
-
not defensive...just wondering what the difference was. same water. nt. |
IndianaJones |
Nov-09-08 04:06 PM |
#15 |
 -
It was defensive... because you were trying to prove some point... |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:08 PM |
#19 |
-
other than different fountains, it was the same water. nt. |
IndianaJones |
Nov-09-08 04:09 PM |
#24 |
-
Actually, I think the analogy is apt. |
dorkulon |
Nov-09-08 04:45 PM |
#54 |
-
if they move to a state that does not recognize their |
libnnc |
Nov-09-08 04:04 PM |
#11 |
 -
They have to remarry or get another civil union then, right? |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:06 PM |
#14 |
  -
They have NO RIGHTS in states that do not have civil union laws |
libnnc |
Nov-09-08 04:07 PM |
#17 |
   -
OK - but if they WERE allowed to marry in California... |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:09 PM |
#23 |
  -
NO |
libnnc |
Nov-09-08 04:10 PM |
#26 |
  -
So the failure of Prop 8 didn't change anything in that respect, correct? |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:11 PM |
#28 |
  -
WHAT ARE YOU SO CONFUSED ABOUT? |
libnnc |
Nov-09-08 04:13 PM |
#32 |
  -
He's confused because you have posted multiple posts, with increasing amounts |
petronius |
Nov-09-08 04:35 PM |
#49 |
  -
there's a wealth of resources out there for those that care to research them :-) nt |
msongs |
Nov-09-08 04:08 PM |
#22 |
 -
I have... are we not allowed to ask questions here? |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:14 PM |
#34 |
 -
Not according to the contract clause of the constitution. |
Radical Activist |
Nov-09-08 04:28 PM |
#42 |
-
if my partner and I went to MA to get married and then came back down to NC |
libnnc |
Nov-09-08 04:32 PM |
#45 |
 -
Not according to the US constitution. |
Radical Activist |
Nov-09-08 04:47 PM |
#56 |
-
well then is DOMA unconstitutional? |
libnnc |
Nov-09-08 04:50 PM |
#57 |
-
I've never thought so. |
Radical Activist |
Nov-09-08 04:54 PM |
#62 |
-
And, more importantly, the "full faith & credit clause" of the 10th amendment |
prodn2000 |
Nov-09-08 05:13 PM |
#66 |
-
Are you looking for a justification that says they "have all the same rights" so you |
hulklogan |
Nov-09-08 04:07 PM |
#18 |
 -
Because I don't fucking know and figured I could ask a question here and get an answer |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:09 PM |
#25 |
  -
Why are you getting so defensive? |
hulklogan |
Nov-09-08 04:11 PM |
#29 |
 -
I undersand the OP's question |
Athens30603 |
Nov-09-08 04:12 PM |
#30 |
-
Thank you... |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:13 PM |
#33 |
-
The biggest difference is that Domestic Partnerships |
SoCalNative |
Nov-09-08 04:08 PM |
#21 |
 -
That applies to private companies in California, right? |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:10 PM |
#27 |
-
There are apparently significant legal differences, but I once didn't give consideration to the |
Mike 03 |
Nov-09-08 04:16 PM |
#35 |
 -
I'm against the ban too... I was just wondering if it made any substantive difference... |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:17 PM |
#36 |
-
I think some of the legal issues mentioned above. But I'm just now learning |
Mike 03 |
Nov-09-08 04:20 PM |
#37 |
-
In California, you can visit your domestic partner I think... |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:22 PM |
#38 |
-
It's a good question and the full answer needs to be understood. |
ColbertWatcher |
Nov-09-08 04:22 PM |
#39 |
 -
Thanks - so far, all I know is that it is cheaper and easier to get a domestic partnership... |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:24 PM |
#40 |
-
Domestic partnerships do not have the same protections that marriage does. |
ColbertWatcher |
Nov-09-08 04:38 PM |
#51 |
-
They can't legally get a divorce? |
ben_meyers |
Nov-09-08 04:25 PM |
#41 |
-
so maybe education is the key here.....some who are affected by prop 8 |
carlyhippy |
Nov-09-08 04:31 PM |
#43 |
-
Equality. |
sfexpat2000 |
Nov-09-08 04:31 PM |
#44 |
-
Gay married couples were one Supreme Court decision away from their marriages being recognized |
gollygee |
Nov-09-08 04:32 PM |
#46 |
 -
Wasn't DOMA made to prevent just that from happening? |
JVS |
Nov-09-08 04:35 PM |
#48 |
  -
Yes but is that in the Constitution? |
gollygee |
Nov-09-08 04:36 PM |
#50 |
 -
Oh ok. So that one court case you mention is the court case against DOMA. |
JVS |
Nov-09-08 04:41 PM |
#52 |
 -
Yeah my thought is . . . |
gollygee |
Nov-09-08 04:45 PM |
#55 |
 -
Lambda Legal and other groups |
ruggerson |
Nov-09-08 04:53 PM |
#60 |
 -
Oh definitely makes sense |
gollygee |
Nov-09-08 04:54 PM |
#61 |
 -
the interesting thing |
ruggerson |
Nov-09-08 04:57 PM |
#63 |
 -
Thanks - makes a lot of sense |
blindbucky |
Nov-09-08 04:43 PM |
#53 |
-
It's because when "Same Sex" is uttered, |
nod4rod |
Nov-10-08 03:49 AM |
#68 |
-
Thanks for asking this question. I've been reading reaction on other message boards.... |
marimour |
Nov-09-08 04:33 PM |
#47 |
-
Did it change anything? You can't be serious. It made gay people second class citizens |
Husb2Sparkly |
Nov-09-08 04:51 PM |
#58 |
-
personally I think government needs to get out |
Lifetimedem |
Nov-09-08 04:51 PM |
#59 |
 -
Agreed. |
Beregond2 |
Nov-09-08 05:22 PM |
#67 |
-
I do see the point you've been trying to make |
laptoprepairguy |
Nov-09-08 05:03 PM |
#64 |
-
start here: |
MPK |
Nov-09-08 05:11 PM |
#65 |