BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-17-07 10:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 54. Thanks entirely to the dipshitfuckwipe Connecticut electorate. |
| -The Dems DO NOT have full control of both houses! Wake up! |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 06:05 PM |
#0 |
-
thing is, the "landslide" people think took place in Nov 2006 never really happened on the scale |
ComerPerro |
Mar-17-07 06:07 PM |
#1 |
 -
I recall in Oct 06 that taking control of the Senate was a long shot |
LSK |
Mar-17-07 06:10 PM |
#3 |
  -
but we barely have control, and even if we did there is a Repig President |
ComerPerro |
Mar-17-07 06:12 PM |
#6 |
   -
Exactly! |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 06:16 PM |
#8 |
  -
My feelings, exactly. |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 06:14 PM |
#7 |
  -
Right ! it plays right into the hands of the MSM |
jaysunb |
Mar-17-07 06:28 PM |
#21 |
   -
That's what I've been noticing, too. |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 06:42 PM |
#28 |
  -
Look how close VA, MO and MT were |
sandnsea |
Mar-18-07 03:31 AM |
#79 |
 -
But you have to admit it was quite a victory |
Pawel K |
Mar-18-07 01:31 PM |
#87 |
 -
You mean it was fraudulently minimised, don't you? Don't kid yourself it was not a landslide. |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Mar-18-07 04:01 PM |
#89 |
-
Filibuster = 60 votes |
LSK |
Mar-17-07 06:08 PM |
#2 |
 -
And that is a big point. I doubt the Dems are inclinded to "go nuclear". |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 06:11 PM |
#5 |
-
And the MSM would crucify them if they did. |
Dr_eldritch |
Mar-17-07 06:46 PM |
#30 |
 -
That's a great idea, too. I think the Dems need to start dropping hints |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 06:53 PM |
#35 |
 -
Fairness doctrine |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-18-07 03:33 AM |
#80 |
-
Couldn't happen. Cheney would have to be a part of it, and I don't think |
MiniMe |
Mar-18-07 12:14 AM |
#69 |
-
You only have to see that we have not yet passed one bill into law |
Robbien |
Mar-17-07 06:10 PM |
#4 |
 -
And that is disheartening. The thing that is GREAT is that we have |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 06:20 PM |
#11 |
 -
sometimes I think we need the definition of filibuster sticked to the top of GD |
LSK |
Mar-17-07 06:24 PM |
#14 |
  -
Yes. That and "It Takes 67 Votes to Convict and Remove a President or VP!" |
AshevilleGuy |
Mar-17-07 06:27 PM |
#17 |
  -
LOL! You think it would help? |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 06:47 PM |
#31 |
 -
Whhat happened to minimum wage? I thought that was going to happen n/t |
AshevilleGuy |
Mar-17-07 06:25 PM |
#15 |
-
No. It is weighed down with a bunch of taxcuts in the Senate |
Robbien |
Mar-17-07 06:51 PM |
#33 |
-
No! This is eating away at my sense of betrayal and outrage!!! |
rockymountaindem |
Mar-17-07 06:19 PM |
#9 |
 -
That wasn't funny. |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 06:23 PM |
#13 |
-
Don't tell *me* what's funny! |
rockymountaindem |
Mar-17-07 06:37 PM |
#25 |
-
Ok. You're funny! |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 06:58 PM |
#37 |
-
But how outraged are you? n/t |
rockymountaindem |
Mar-17-07 07:23 PM |
#44 |
-
Well, looking down thread |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 07:40 PM |
#48 |
-
I couldn't help myself either ( LOL) so |
jaysunb |
Mar-17-07 06:20 PM |
#10 |
 -
Thanks! |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 06:56 PM |
#36 |
-
I agree, every time I hear one of the talking heads on TV.... |
ClintonTyree |
Mar-17-07 06:23 PM |
#12 |
-
I Fear That Your Sound Logic And Reasoning May Hurt Some People's Brains Here To Hear. Great Post! |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Mar-17-07 06:25 PM |
#16 |
 -
I think sometimes it just helps to make a point of the obvious. |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 06:33 PM |
#23 |
-
BUT! Unholy joe did |
zidzi |
Mar-17-07 06:27 PM |
#18 |
 -
His "morals" only go so far, Zidzi! |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 07:59 PM |
#52 |
 -
No he didn't |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-17-07 11:25 PM |
#62 |
-
i think johnson can vote |
madrchsod |
Mar-17-07 06:28 PM |
#19 |
 -
No, Johnson can't vote unless he's there. |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 07:00 PM |
#39 |
-
Off to the Greatest Page with you. |
Cerridwen |
Mar-17-07 06:28 PM |
#20 |
 -
Thanks, Cerridwen! |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 06:38 PM |
#26 |
-
true! In '08 we must target Dems who vote with Repubs |
Shoelace |
Mar-17-07 06:31 PM |
#22 |
 -
Nelson was just re-elected last year. Pryor in 2004, I think. n/t |
AshevilleGuy |
Mar-17-07 06:34 PM |
#24 |
-
thanks, was wondering about that |
Shoelace |
Mar-17-07 06:38 PM |
#27 |
-
kick and recommend! This is so important! n/t |
terip64 |
Mar-17-07 06:43 PM |
#29 |
-
If a post ever deserved a recommendation... |
karlrschneider |
Mar-17-07 06:49 PM |
#32 |
 -
Thanks, Karl! |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 07:14 PM |
#42 |
-
Naw, I'm really a grumpy old phart who wants to stick with facts and reality |
karlrschneider |
Mar-17-07 07:40 PM |
#49 |
-
This is no excuse ... being in the minority was no excuse. |
JackRiddler |
Mar-17-07 06:53 PM |
#34 |
-
SHHH trying to educate people on how this works |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-17-07 06:58 PM |
#38 |
-
Good points and a good job pointing this out. NT |
leeroysphits |
Mar-17-07 07:01 PM |
#40 |
-
Making the stand is far more important than the outcome. |
greyhound1966 |
Mar-17-07 07:01 PM |
#41 |
 -
I totally agree with "making the stand", and that's what the original post was |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 07:33 PM |
#46 |
-
Made a mistake in the original post: |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 07:20 PM |
#43 |
-
So I guess |
LWolf |
Mar-17-07 07:26 PM |
#45 |
-
Only 1/3 of the Senate was up for reelection in 2006. Keep that in mind. That |
Peace Patriot |
Mar-17-07 07:35 PM |
#47 |
 -
And if something isn't done in a BIG HURRY, it's going to happen again |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 07:52 PM |
#51 |
-
Hi, LoudSue! Sorry to get back to you so late. (Had to eat dinner. Had a guest.) |
Peace Patriot |
Mar-18-07 02:28 AM |
#74 |
-
That sentence should be posted at the TOP of every DU page: |
loudsue |
Mar-18-07 02:57 AM |
#78 |
-
All they need to control is THE HOUSE |
TheConstantGardener |
Mar-17-07 07:46 PM |
#50 |
-
We have some members of congress |
thethinker |
Mar-17-07 10:01 PM |
#53 |
-
Thanks entirely to the dipshitfuckwipe Connecticut electorate. |
BlooInBloo |
Mar-17-07 10:02 PM |
#54 |
 -
Not quite |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-17-07 10:05 PM |
#55 |
-
Oh fine. I retract the word "entirely". :) |
BlooInBloo |
Mar-17-07 10:35 PM |
#59 |
-
And I made a mistake |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-17-07 11:22 PM |
#61 |
-
Impeachment = indictment. House = grand jury/prosecutor. Senate = jury. Chief justice = judge. |
BlooInBloo |
Mar-17-07 11:38 PM |
#63 |
-
Yep |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-17-07 11:40 PM |
#65 |
-
KnR. Great post -- a voice of sanity, reason, and logic has spoken! |
Hekate |
Mar-17-07 10:20 PM |
#56 |
 -
Thanks, Hekate! |
loudsue |
Mar-17-07 11:19 PM |
#60 |
-
Excellent and informative post. KNR. ....n/t |
WiseButAngrySara |
Mar-17-07 10:20 PM |
#57 |
-
But there is enough control that the Dems could stop this war |
MadHound |
Mar-17-07 10:34 PM |
#58 |
 -
No, it is not a matter of will |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-17-07 11:42 PM |
#66 |
-
For the LAST TIME they don't need 60 votes in the Senate |
TheConstantGardener |
Mar-18-07 02:32 AM |
#75 |
 -
I just happen to know the procedure |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-18-07 02:42 AM |
#76 |
-
Ummm, did you even read my post? |
MadHound |
Mar-18-07 06:57 AM |
#83 |
-
If we wait for control of the Senate, we'll be waiting forever... |
ToeBot |
Mar-17-07 11:38 PM |
#64 |
 -
Hmm you do kow that there are enough repukes up for |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-17-07 11:43 PM |
#67 |
-
Thanks for telling people about reality |
nolabels |
Mar-17-07 11:57 PM |
#68 |
 -
Thank you, nolabels! |
loudsue |
Mar-18-07 12:19 AM |
#70 |
-
K&R, thanks for the reality check loudsue! nt |
Land Shark |
Mar-18-07 12:28 AM |
#71 |
-
I agree, our control is very slim at best in the senate |
MasterDarkNinja |
Mar-18-07 12:41 AM |
#72 |
 -
Nitpick here |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-18-07 02:46 AM |
#77 |
-
You're right about that, Nadin. And I'm beginning to think that |
loudsue |
Mar-18-07 03:56 AM |
#81 |
-
Look at Watergate |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-18-07 04:07 AM |
#82 |
-
Bingo. |
ellisonz |
Mar-18-07 02:25 AM |
#73 |
-
They have the numbers to start the wheels of justice turning. |
mmonk |
Mar-18-07 07:25 AM |
#84 |
-
A lot of pugs are up in the Senate in 08; we must get rid of the voting |
MasonJar |
Mar-18-07 11:38 AM |
#85 |
-
Thank You for adding clarity to what is certainly a frustrating situation |
Morereason |
Mar-18-07 11:59 AM |
#86 |
-
Always an excuse. |
RestoreGore |
Mar-18-07 03:21 PM |
#88 |
-
A well-needed post. |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Mar-18-07 04:02 PM |
#90 |