| 60. then explain it to me |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-28-08 12:20 PM by notadmblnd
Seems to me the small narrow minds are the ones thinking that she is somehow nasty for showing a part of her chest. But go ahead and swear at me, because I can see that it is the only argument you have.
|
| -PLEASE put some clothes on Rachel! |
JoMama49 |
Oct-28-08 09:41 AM |
#0 |
-
This post needs pictures. |
tekisui |
Oct-28-08 09:42 AM |
#1 |
 -
grow up |
eowyn_of_rohan |
Oct-28-08 12:15 PM |
#53 |
  -
Thank you, no. |
tekisui |
Oct-28-08 12:28 PM |
#68 |
  -
How are we supposed to know what he's talking about, without pictures? |
quantessd |
Oct-28-08 03:32 PM |
#93 |
  -
yes, that is very juvenile, and demeaning of women |
bobbolink |
Oct-28-08 09:24 PM |
#121 |
 -
sorry, guys like tits. It's human nature. |
wolverinez |
Oct-28-08 10:03 PM |
#125 |
 -
Yes, but she does not really try to appeal to guys, ok... |
AzNick |
Oct-29-08 12:28 AM |
#143 |
  -
The network wants her to. nt |
MookieWilson |
Oct-29-08 10:27 AM |
#150 |
 -
Ever consider a bit of DIGNITY????? |
bobbolink |
Oct-29-08 11:18 AM |
#156 |
  -
who cares about a woman's dignity? boys like boobies! n/t |
Scout |
Oct-29-08 01:36 PM |
#171 |
  -
You sound overly stressed and sensitive |
wolverinez |
Oct-30-08 03:16 PM |
#182 |
 -
It's offensive when it's being forced on someone to market a 'news' show. nt |
MookieWilson |
Oct-29-08 12:08 PM |
#164 |
 -
Yes, pictures are a must |
sugarraydodge |
Oct-28-08 12:16 PM |
#54 |
 -
That statue of lady justice needs some clothes too - put Asscroft on it! |
grahamhgreen |
Oct-28-08 03:04 PM |
#86 |
-
I don't know about her cloths... |
Supply Side Jesus |
Oct-28-08 09:43 AM |
#2 |
-
She would be attractive in a burlap sack, so no need to go overboard there, guys. |
Aristus |
Oct-28-08 09:44 AM |
#3 |
-
This thread is worthless without pictures. |
BlooInBloo |
Oct-28-08 09:46 AM |
#4 |
-
Here's a magnet you can buy...kind of cute! |
KansDem |
Oct-28-08 09:51 AM |
#5 |
-
Yes, I did notice that last night. Her neckline was dangerously low. |
RebelOne |
Oct-28-08 09:53 AM |
#6 |
-
She looked classy and elegant. She didn't have anything showing. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-28-08 09:55 AM |
#7 |
 -
Perfect! |
Bryn |
Oct-28-08 10:59 AM |
#26 |
-
I agree.... that is the first thing I noticed last night was how they |
movonne |
Oct-28-08 09:58 AM |
#8 |
 -
I love Rachel too, and I don't know why her wardrobe managers |
JoMama49 |
Oct-28-08 10:02 AM |
#10 |
  -
It's just terrible the way women are forced to tart up for television or more formal events. |
MookieWilson |
Oct-28-08 10:04 AM |
#11 |
   -
Why don't you write to MSNBC and suggest they put a burka on her? |
notadmblnd |
Oct-28-08 11:16 AM |
#34 |
    -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-28-08 12:17 PM |
#56 |
     -
then explain it to me |
notadmblnd |
Oct-28-08 12:19 PM |
#60 |
      -
yeah, because there is no way to dress in between what's she's wearing now |
Scout |
Oct-28-08 12:22 PM |
#63 |
     -
"Grow the fuck up" is your argument? |
notadmblnd |
Oct-28-08 12:24 PM |
#64 |
     -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-28-08 12:27 PM |
#67 |
     -
My argument is that if the OP has a problem with what rachael wears |
notadmblnd |
Oct-28-08 12:56 PM |
#72 |
     -
there you go again, making shit up n/t |
Scout |
Oct-28-08 01:50 PM |
#78 |
     -
A woman needs to keep her opinions to herself. |
bobbolink |
Oct-29-08 12:04 PM |
#162 |
     -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-28-08 03:25 PM |
#88 |
    -
One extreme or another, eh? |
bobbolink |
Oct-28-08 09:25 PM |
#122 |
   -
that's how you can tell a formal event from a regular one.... |
Scout |
Oct-28-08 12:18 PM |
#58 |
  -
The only way she could compete with the FOX "babes" |
Kool Kitty |
Oct-29-08 12:52 AM |
#146 |
 -
Women need to have jackets tailored to them, otherwise, they just don't fit right... |
MookieWilson |
Oct-28-08 10:39 AM |
#20 |
-
I noticed it and could only think |
jimshoes |
Oct-28-08 10:00 AM |
#9 |
-
I thought she looked a bit off last night for some reason |
ThePowerofWill |
Oct-28-08 10:05 AM |
#12 |
-
Is she Palin's size? I understand Palin will be getting rid of |
rurallib |
Oct-28-08 10:06 AM |
#13 |
-
The modesty doesn't bother me as much as it wasn't flattering to her. Here's a youtube clip |
OmmmSweetOmmm |
Oct-28-08 10:07 AM |
#14 |
 -
I guess, but she is wearing a suit coat, so how immodest can it be? nt |
Deep13 |
Oct-28-08 10:45 AM |
# |
  -
That's why I gave no thought to the "modesty" aspect of her outfit. |
OmmmSweetOmmm |
Oct-28-08 11:05 AM |
#29 |
 -
Thanks for posting this youtube clip - I really think cami's |
JoMama49 |
Oct-28-08 10:45 AM |
#21 |
  -
I didn't notice an inch of clevage there, so I'm not seeing a problem |
Lorien |
Oct-28-08 11:11 AM |
#31 |
   -
I don't mind seeing cleavage at all, in most venues, but an |
JoMama49 |
Oct-28-08 11:20 AM |
#38 |
    -
The men on MSNBC are dressed for the office, she should be also. nt |
MookieWilson |
Oct-28-08 03:29 PM |
#91 |
   -
Simple concept, isn't it? |
bobbolink |
Oct-29-08 11:52 AM |
#158 |
   -
When did a woman's choice to show cleavage become a problem? |
Zhade |
Oct-28-08 10:14 PM |
#127 |
  -
It's not her choice. nt |
MookieWilson |
Oct-29-08 10:27 AM |
#151 |
  -
It just doesn't look business-like, as the clothes the men on MSNBC wear. nt |
MookieWilson |
Oct-28-08 03:28 PM |
#90 |
  -
Rewatched clip of show |
Believing_Is_Art |
Oct-28-08 08:21 PM |
#106 |
 -
You're right |
Ms. Toad |
Oct-28-08 11:19 AM |
#37 |
 -
I didn't like it. Not a good look for her. |
knitter4democracy |
Oct-28-08 12:35 PM |
#71 |
  -
We just don't have conversations like this about men's clothes. Networks don't sex up the men...nt |
MookieWilson |
Oct-28-08 08:45 PM |
#112 |
 -
Last night there was a thread about KO's purple suit. nt |
Mariana |
Oct-28-08 10:02 PM |
#124 |
 -
Yeah, I've never ever read anything about men's hair or clothes here. |
knitter4democracy |
Oct-29-08 02:59 PM |
#175 |
 -
I think she looks stunning. |
Codeine |
Oct-28-08 01:12 PM |
#74 |
 -
She looks fine to me. |
TheWraith |
Oct-28-08 01:48 PM |
#77 |
 -
McCloon - "We talk about nuclear power..it has to be safe, environmental, blah blah blah.." |
paparush |
Oct-28-08 02:41 PM |
#81 |
 -
Sometimes I just don't understand this place. |
Marr |
Oct-29-08 12:20 AM |
#142 |
-
Lemme see! |
dhpgetsit |
Oct-28-08 10:08 AM |
#15 |
 -
I didn't see anything immodest either.......the food network really shows cleavage and |
Gin |
Oct-28-08 10:36 AM |
#16 |
  -
On the food network the women are all wearing shrink-wrap, which, I guess... |
MookieWilson |
Oct-28-08 10:38 AM |
#18 |
  -
Yeah I'm always a little shocked by Giada DiLaurentiis |
frickaline |
Oct-28-08 10:50 AM |
#23 |
  -
lol! I was watching Sandra Lee on Saturday and she had some Halloween costumes on... |
OmmmSweetOmmm |
Oct-28-08 01:25 PM |
#75 |
 -
Neither did I |
DS1 |
Oct-28-08 10:37 AM |
#17 |
-
Some dirty jezebel might be showing ankle. |
Chovexani |
Oct-28-08 04:58 PM |
#100 |
-
The "fuss" is that some people don't like women making choices that THEY wouldn't make. |
Zhade |
Oct-28-08 10:17 PM |
#128 |
-
I admit I did notice last night |
shadowknows69 |
Oct-28-08 10:39 AM |
#19 |
-
We Need The Taliban! This Country Is Filth! Bring In The Taliban! |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Oct-28-08 10:48 AM |
#22 |
 -
LOL |
Bryn |
Oct-28-08 11:04 AM |
#28 |
 -
I'm mad she doesn't show more. n/t |
greguganus |
Oct-28-08 12:27 PM |
#66 |
-
I found her outfit unflattering |
frickaline |
Oct-28-08 10:54 AM |
#24 |
-
She's a grown ass women...she can wear whatever she wants. |
Evoman |
Oct-28-08 10:54 AM |
#25 |
 -
I really, really, doubt that she is being allowed to wear whatever she wants.... |
Scout |
Oct-28-08 12:21 PM |
#61 |
 -
She is SOOOOO not wearing what she normally would |
thecorrection |
Oct-28-08 01:31 PM |
#76 |
-
well put, i say, good on you: "MSNBC is de-dykifying her." n/t |
Scout |
Oct-28-08 01:52 PM |
#79 |
-
Wow! |
Eryemil |
Oct-28-08 02:51 PM |
#83 |
 -
She's a big 'ol dyke and it makes me chuckle when I see her on MSNBC |
thecorrection |
Oct-28-08 03:50 PM |
#97 |
-
I recall her saying that she's had to fight to keep her butch look on tv |
Chovexani |
Oct-28-08 05:01 PM |
#102 |
 -
On an HD projector, the makeup on men is noticable |
Lilith Velkor |
Oct-29-08 12:40 PM |
#167 |
-
I have an LCD, and it's noticable if they cake it on or do a poor job of it |
Chovexani |
Oct-29-08 04:20 PM |
#176 |
-
The Rachel look is catching on in DC |
Lilith Velkor |
Oct-30-08 10:59 AM |
#180 |
-
EXACTLY. This is NOT what she wants to wear. nt |
MookieWilson |
Oct-28-08 09:01 PM |
#116 |
-
You don't know that. You're assuming. |
Zhade |
Oct-28-08 10:25 PM |
#130 |
-
I think this article goes a long way in confirming that assumption |
thecorrection |
Oct-29-08 01:06 AM |
#147 |
-
for all those calling their fellow DUers prudes, and saying we think the female body is nasty.... |
Scout |
Oct-29-08 01:26 PM |
#170 |
-
BINGO |
MookieWilson |
Oct-29-08 01:50 PM |
#172 |
-
I agree, something with a bit higher neckline would be better |
mrone2 |
Oct-28-08 11:00 AM |
#27 |
-
Rachel's cleavage is FAR less offensive... |
BanTheGOP |
Oct-28-08 11:06 AM |
#30 |
-
Being a 54 year old grandma, I saw absolutely nothing wrong with what she was wearing. |
madmom |
Oct-28-08 11:13 AM |
#32 |
 -
There's nothing wrong with it. It's not the way she prefers to dress and it's not comparable... |
MookieWilson |
Oct-28-08 03:25 PM |
#89 |
-
I saw the show last night. I didn't think it was that bad |
notadmblnd |
Oct-28-08 11:15 AM |
#33 |
 -
I have been listening to Rachel since way before she became` |
JoMama49 |
Oct-28-08 11:34 AM |
#42 |
  -
Oh yah, I can see where we were all wrong. I'll go burka shopping and pick one up for Rachal |
notadmblnd |
Oct-28-08 11:56 AM |
#44 |
  -
To each his/her own I guess but until it was mentioned I hadn't noticed. I go there to hear what |
madmom |
Oct-28-08 04:32 PM |
#99 |
  -
Good for you. Now, stop trying to impose your standards on others. |
Zhade |
Oct-28-08 10:27 PM |
#131 |
 -
no one called her a harlot |
Scout |
Oct-28-08 12:24 PM |
#65 |
-
/This thread is useless without pics of dangerously low necklines. |
paparush |
Oct-28-08 11:16 AM |
#35 |
 -
The youtube clip is back in post 14, link: |
frickaline |
Oct-28-08 11:18 AM |
#36 |
-
I watched the show twice and didn't notice any cleavage. |
blackops |
Oct-28-08 11:20 AM |
#39 |
 -
I don't mind the absence of jewelry (she doesn't wear earrings |
JoMama49 |
Oct-28-08 11:29 AM |
#41 |
-
I'll send her an email that you approve of her lack of jewelry. She's been on pins and needles |
GreenJ |
Oct-28-08 11:59 AM |
#46 |
-
Without a necklace, the display of exposed flesh is more obvious. nt |
blackops |
Oct-28-08 12:00 PM |
#47 |
-
dupe. |
blackops |
Oct-28-08 12:00 PM |
#48 |
-
She looked fine to me. |
GreenEyedLefty |
Oct-28-08 11:29 AM |
#40 |
-
MSNBC dresses her |
caraher |
Oct-28-08 11:50 AM |
#43 |
-
I cannot believe this ridiculous thread has so many responding seriously. |
GreenJ |
Oct-28-08 11:57 AM |
#45 |
 -
apparently, we have some prude posting that thinks that the female chest is nasty. |
notadmblnd |
Oct-28-08 12:00 PM |
#49 |
  -
Why can't we see Olbermann's chest hair ? |
eowyn_of_rohan |
Oct-28-08 12:19 PM |
#59 |
   -
I don't know, but if he did show it I wouldn't complain |
notadmblnd |
Oct-28-08 12:21 PM |
#62 |
   -
You GOT me!. . lolololol . . . . spit-take! . . . . |
annabanana |
Oct-28-08 02:47 PM |
#82 |
   -
Perhaps a speedo for him. If we're going to see her rack, let's see something worth looking at- |
MookieWilson |
Oct-28-08 03:30 PM |
#92 |
  -
camel toe? |
eowyn_of_rohan |
Oct-28-08 08:28 PM |
#107 |
  -
there you go again, making shit up n/t |
Scout |
Oct-28-08 12:28 PM |
#69 |
 -
"PLEASE put some clothes on Rachel!" |
Hardhead |
Oct-28-08 03:51 PM |
#98 |
  -
the post i was replying to is making up words to put in other people's mouths |
Scout |
Oct-28-08 05:41 PM |
#103 |
 -
He made a reasonable inference from the thread title |
Hardhead |
Oct-28-08 05:55 PM |
#104 |
 -
no, i can't possibly be that stupid, but i bet you could be! |
Scout |
Oct-28-08 09:09 PM |
#119 |
 -
Why aren't you using that tired refrain on those assuming they know what she wants to wear? |
Zhade |
Oct-28-08 10:29 PM |
#132 |
 -
no shit |
fascisthunter |
Oct-28-08 12:01 PM |
#50 |
-
dupe - deleted |
caraher |
Oct-28-08 12:03 PM |
#51 |
-
How can you people talk so much about Rachel's chestal |
Z_I_Peevey |
Oct-28-08 12:06 PM |
#52 |
-
Oh come on...we all want our news to look like this |
Taverner |
Oct-28-08 12:16 PM |
#55 |
-
Yes, for heaven's sake, Rachel, put some clothes on! |
frogmarch |
Oct-28-08 12:18 PM |
#57 |
-
What is nice about Rachel's decolletage |
SheWhoMustBeObeyed |
Oct-28-08 12:35 PM |
#70 |
 -
MSNBC forces her to wear those jackets? |
upi402 |
Oct-28-08 01:53 PM |
#80 |
 -
who gives a flying #### about Rachel's decolletage? |
eowyn_of_rohan |
Oct-28-08 08:40 PM |
#110 |
-
Lighten up, Francis |
SheWhoMustBeObeyed |
Oct-28-08 11:06 PM |
#138 |
-
Has been the norm now, for all the shows |
question everything |
Oct-28-08 01:09 PM |
#73 |
 -
If the men are in business suits, the women should also be in businesswear. It's that simple. |
MookieWilson |
Oct-28-08 03:24 PM |
#87 |
-
I can only BEGIN to imagine what she would make of this silly thread. |
annabanana |
Oct-28-08 02:55 PM |
#84 |
-
I didn't actually notice anything. |
riverdeep |
Oct-28-08 02:56 PM |
#85 |
-
oh good grief |
JitterbugPerfume |
Oct-28-08 03:39 PM |
#94 |
-
Why complain to us? Why not e-mail Rachel directly? |
foxfeet |
Oct-28-08 03:43 PM |
#95 |
-
oh, she is beautiful |
nugzie |
Oct-28-08 03:48 PM |
#96 |
-
Tell you what, you get your own show on MSNBC |
Chovexani |
Oct-28-08 04:58 PM |
#101 |
-
I didn't think it was too much cleavage, |
Believing_Is_Art |
Oct-28-08 08:14 PM |
#105 |
-
How sad that we base a womans worth |
Texasgal |
Oct-28-08 08:29 PM |
#108 |
 -
... |
eowyn_of_rohan |
Oct-28-08 08:31 PM |
#109 |
 -
That they are CHANGING her wardrobe to tart her up is the issue. nt |
MookieWilson |
Oct-28-08 08:43 PM |
#111 |
  -
who is "they" and why should it matter? |
Texasgal |
Oct-28-08 08:48 PM |
#113 |
   -
The network doesn't think she's 'sexy' enough. |
MookieWilson |
Oct-28-08 09:00 PM |
#115 |
  -
And this is a bad thing? |
Texasgal |
Oct-28-08 09:06 PM |
#118 |
   -
They are changing the way she wants to look. She looks like Barbie Maddow. nt |
MookieWilson |
Oct-28-08 09:09 PM |
#120 |
  -
To YOU maybe |
Texasgal |
Oct-28-08 11:11 PM |
#139 |
  -
What evidence do you have that supports your argument? |
Zhade |
Oct-28-08 10:34 PM |
#135 |
  -
Can you actually, you know, prove your assertion that this is happening? |
Zhade |
Oct-28-08 10:33 PM |
#134 |
 -
Best reply so far - thread over! |
Zhade |
Oct-28-08 10:32 PM |
#133 |
-
Leave to a man to decide when or when not, women should feel insulted. nt |
MookieWilson |
Oct-29-08 12:10 PM |
#165 |
-
No. Rachel is hot. She should flaunt her hotness more, not cover it up. (nt) |
w4rma |
Oct-28-08 08:53 PM |
#114 |
-
I noticed that.... |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Oct-28-08 09:03 PM |
#117 |
-
What's really sad is reading the rest of the comments here, and seeing |
bobbolink |
Oct-28-08 09:27 PM |
#123 |
 -
So you don't believe in women making choices you wouldn't? |
Zhade |
Oct-28-08 10:35 PM |
#136 |
-
It's not Maddow's choice. THAT's the issue. nt |
MookieWilson |
Oct-29-08 10:30 AM |
#153 |
-
The issue is DIGNITY. |
bobbolink |
Oct-29-08 11:14 AM |
#155 |
-
It may not be "her choice" |
BornBlue |
Oct-29-08 02:18 PM |
#173 |
-
So what are you thinking, a burka? |
Zhade |
Oct-28-08 10:10 PM |
#126 |
-
What |
southernyankeebelle |
Oct-28-08 10:22 PM |
#129 |
-
It's her show. She should wear what she wants. |
obiwan |
Oct-28-08 10:41 PM |
#137 |
-
Wow, look at all the responses. |
riverdeep |
Oct-28-08 11:55 PM |
#140 |
-
I heard Sarah Palin talking about you yesterday. |
Swamp Rat |
Oct-29-08 12:07 AM |
#141 |
-
Are people really complaining about Rachel Maddow's "risque" wardrobe? |
SurferBoy |
Oct-29-08 12:35 AM |
#144 |
 -
No, the fact that the network is trying to tart her up. THAT's what people are noting. nt |
MookieWilson |
Oct-29-08 10:29 AM |
#152 |
-
Helen Lovejoy is that you? |
LeftyMom |
Oct-29-08 12:42 AM |
#145 |
-
I've watched practically every show of hers, and never noticed her breasts at all. |
TexasObserver |
Oct-29-08 01:08 AM |
#148 |
-
Rachel's primary draw is her immense brain.. M$NBC could dress her up in fancy hats. |
0rganism |
Oct-29-08 01:10 AM |
#149 |
 -
Brains vs. Tits |
LeFleur1 |
Oct-29-08 10:39 AM |
#154 |
-
This thread is still kicking around?????????? |
ailsagirl |
Oct-29-08 11:18 AM |
#157 |
-
prude |
UndertheOcean |
Oct-29-08 11:53 AM |
#159 |
-
She looks fine to me! n/t |
ObamaVision |
Oct-29-08 12:01 PM |
#160 |
-
If this thread won't die, it should at least put some clothes on. n/t |
rucky |
Oct-29-08 12:02 PM |
#161 |
 -
Fortunately, some men -unlike yourself - understand the issue. Read other threads instead. nt |
MookieWilson |
Oct-29-08 12:07 PM |
#163 |
-
It's not an issue, it's a shirt. |
rucky |
Oct-29-08 12:15 PM |
#166 |
-
She looks great |
Meiko |
Oct-29-08 12:48 PM |
#168 |
-
I've thought the same thing. |
OHDEM |
Oct-29-08 12:56 PM |
#169 |
-
if you get to call out the 'modesty police' -- do i get to call out |
xchrom |
Oct-29-08 02:23 PM |
#174 |
-
Another man who doesn't understand that tarting up a woman who doesn't want to be tarted up... |
MookieWilson |
Oct-29-08 10:15 PM |
#177 |
-
two things -- first unles you have it from rachels mouth that |
xchrom |
Oct-30-08 08:55 AM |
#178 |
-
If you read in this thread, there are quotations from her on what she likes to look like. nt |
MookieWilson |
Oct-30-08 09:59 AM |
#179 |
-
all speculation -- |
xchrom |
Oct-30-08 01:27 PM |
#181 |