You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: The talking headery is what prompted this question. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The talking headery is what prompted this question.
I trust them as far as I can throw them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -A question about Obama and negative ads (looking for an honest answer, not a spun answer) Husb2Sparkly  Oct-11-08 10:49 AM   #0 
  - according to the talking heads lately Obama is running about 1/3 'negative' ads  AZDemDist6   Oct-11-08 10:52 AM   #1 
  - The talking headery is what prompted this question.  Husb2Sparkly   Oct-11-08 10:54 AM   #2 
  - That is correct.Here`s some more info...  Hope And Change   Oct-11-08 10:56 AM   #5 
  - I would look carefully at what they call "negative."  Jackpine Radical   Oct-11-08 10:59 AM   #6 
     - Yup, that's part of it .....  Husb2Sparkly   Oct-11-08 11:05 AM   #8 
        - You're right. But Obama's integrity matters to me.  Jackpine Radical   Oct-11-08 11:11 AM   #11 
           - I think we're in full agreement.  Husb2Sparkly   Oct-11-08 11:18 AM   #14 
  - Lots of fairly neutral websites track the bended and blended truth... Obama is not 100% clean..  iiibbb   Oct-11-08 10:56 AM   #3 
  - Ummmmm .......  Husb2Sparkly   Oct-11-08 10:59 AM   #7 
     - Politicians lie... this should be no surprise.  iiibbb   Oct-11-08 11:12 PM   #27 
  - No, although some in media claim his ad about McCain's Soc Sec stance is false  wishlist   Oct-11-08 10:56 AM   #4 
  - This can be open to interpretation.  Lasher   Oct-11-08 11:06 AM   #9 
  - Even the "full actual truth" can be negative, I think.  Donald Ian Rankin   Oct-11-08 11:09 AM   #10 
  - Obviously, there is more than one possible definition of "negative."  Jackpine Radical   Oct-11-08 11:14 AM   #12 
  - It simply isn't easy to simply define it  Husb2Sparkly   Oct-11-08 11:17 AM   #13 
     - "John McCain has killed people"  Contrary1   Oct-11-08 11:21 AM   #15 
     - "Negative" doesn't mean "unjust".  Donald Ian Rankin   Oct-11-08 07:17 PM   #26 
  - Depends on your definition - not to be slick, but ...Example:  old mark   Oct-11-08 11:46 AM   #16 
  - We agree  Husb2Sparkly   Oct-11-08 11:48 AM   #17 
  - Of course they have, but negative ads don't have to be factually incorrect.  last1standing   Oct-11-08 11:48 AM   #18 
  - More of the same dilemma of other replies to this thread .....  Husb2Sparkly   Oct-11-08 11:56 AM   #20 
     - In your context Obama has still run negative advertising.  last1standing   Oct-11-08 12:16 PM   #23 
  - Well, the Keating 5 web ad wasn't exactly a positive ad  endthewar   Oct-11-08 11:55 AM   #19 
  - On MSNBC they had data showing McCain and RNC running 100% negative ads the last 12 days  endthewar   Oct-11-08 11:56 AM   #21 
  - Obama has sold himself as a Dem, yet he has taken a huge right turn since the primaries.  TheGoldenRule   Oct-11-08 12:11 PM   #22 
  - Obama in 2003  endthewar   Oct-11-08 12:56 PM   #25 
  - Yes, because they are defining positive as "pro candidate" and negative as "anti opponent"  orangepeel68   Oct-11-08 12:29 PM   #24 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC