emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-05-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
| -About those rape kits... |
TreasonousBastard |
Oct-05-08 01:39 PM |
#0 |
 -
They had no business billing their insurance. |
ingac70 |
Oct-05-08 01:42 PM |
#1 |
 -
Absolutely correct. The cost of using those kits needed to be |
Midlodemocrat |
Oct-05-08 01:43 PM |
#2 |
 -
Maybe there's just a shitload of rapes going on there |
someonehasdementia |
Oct-05-08 02:01 PM |
#12 |
| -
Unfortunately, there ARE. Alaska's statewide rape stats are 2+ times the na tonal average and I |
beac |
Oct-05-08 02:34 PM |
#21 |
| -
Actually, and unfortunately, you are correct. |
Midlodemocrat |
Oct-05-08 02:37 PM |
#24 |
| -
Also the meth capital |
jmowreader |
Oct-05-08 08:02 PM |
#59 |
| -
agreed. |
YDogg |
Oct-05-08 01:44 PM |
#5 |
| -
They could BILL, but insurance would DENY since not health care. |
uppityperson |
Oct-05-08 03:29 PM |
#47 |
| -
There is ZERO health value for a rape kit |
alcibiades_mystery |
Oct-05-08 01:43 PM |
#3 |
| -
Working poor |
Abaddon865 |
Oct-05-08 01:43 PM |
#4 |
| -
Rape kits are not considered medical care or treatment, they're forensics tools. |
wienerdoggie |
Oct-05-08 01:44 PM |
#6 |
| -
Illinois did the same thing. |
emilyg |
Oct-05-08 02:59 PM |
#40 |
| -
Look, it's EmilyG, here to help the enemy. Good for you, Em. |
wienerdoggie |
Oct-05-08 03:01 PM |
#41 |
| -
shut-up bully. |
emilyg |
Oct-05-08 06:46 PM |
#56 |
| -
That's illegal |
sandnsea |
Oct-05-08 01:45 PM |
#7 |
| -
Billing the insurance company costs the insured...reduces their lifetime or yearly benefits |
Liberal_in_LA |
Oct-05-08 01:46 PM |
#8 |
| -
So it would be OK tfor the police to bill all victims? |
ThoughtCriminal |
Oct-05-08 01:47 PM |
#9 |
| -
well what if they didn't have insurance... |
MrsBrady |
Oct-05-08 01:47 PM |
#10 |
| -
Its general procedure to bill the inusance companies |
Az |
Oct-05-08 01:48 PM |
#11 |
| -
We are not talking about a State |
Bluenorthwest |
Oct-05-08 03:10 PM |
#43 |
| -
In Illinois |
uppityperson |
Oct-05-08 04:18 PM |
#53 |
| -
It's one of those areas in which we mirror the Freepii - we cherish the easy talking point, |
apocalypsehow |
Oct-05-08 02:09 PM |
#13 |
| -
"long debunked" - WTF? |
ThoughtCriminal |
Oct-05-08 02:22 PM |
#16 |
| -
No skin off my nose if you want to keep peddling that debunked line - like I said, Palin deserves |
apocalypsehow |
Oct-05-08 02:27 PM |
#17 |
| -
You have not responded to a single point |
ThoughtCriminal |
Oct-05-08 02:32 PM |
#20 |
| -
The link in the OP at Fact Check thoroughly debunks it, as does numerous other sources. |
apocalypsehow |
Oct-05-08 02:37 PM |
#23 |
| -
It is a pitiful "debunking" |
ThoughtCriminal |
Oct-05-08 02:52 PM |
#36 |
| -
You should read this: |
LibInTexas |
Oct-05-08 02:28 PM |
#18 |
| -
Some of you people don't read very well - even your own links. |
apocalypsehow |
Oct-05-08 02:35 PM |
#22 |
| -
That's some very selecttive reading there |
ThoughtCriminal |
Oct-05-08 02:40 PM |
#26 |
| -
Not a bit of it - but you go right ahead and believe what you wish. |
apocalypsehow |
Oct-05-08 02:42 PM |
#29 |
| -
??? |
ThoughtCriminal |
Oct-05-08 02:57 PM |
#39 |
| -
INSANE. |
beac |
Oct-05-08 02:42 PM |
#28 |
| -
I agree with you there, though not for the same reasons. |
apocalypsehow |
Oct-05-08 02:45 PM |
#31 |
| -
It's splitting hairs to say it's debunked because the victims weren't |
LibInTexas |
Oct-05-08 02:52 PM |
#35 |
| -
You say it's splitting hairs, I say it's an important distinction. We'll have to agree to disagree. |
apocalypsehow |
Oct-05-08 02:54 PM |
#38 |
| -
It DOES NOT DEBUNK the story. When people hear that "It's been debunked..." |
LibInTexas |
Oct-05-08 03:04 PM |
#42 |
| -
Tax cuts or support victims of sexual abuse crimes? Hmm, which to chose. |
uppityperson |
Oct-05-08 04:11 PM |
#52 |
| -
Did you stop beating your wife? n/t |
ismnotwasm |
Oct-05-08 03:41 PM |
#49 |
| -
Speaking of meeting on the other side... |
beac |
Oct-05-08 02:38 PM |
#25 |
| -
LOL! |
apocalypsehow |
Oct-05-08 02:41 PM |
#27 |
| -
It seems you stopped taking yours for |
beac |
Oct-05-08 02:43 PM |
#30 |
| -
Whatever you say. Have a wonderful afternoon, and don't forget to vote Nov. 4th. |
apocalypsehow |
Oct-05-08 02:47 PM |
#33 |
| -
You too. |
beac |
Oct-05-08 02:53 PM |
#37 |
| -
You know, there is really only one way to settle this: ask Palin herself. |
ColbertWatcher |
Oct-05-08 03:25 PM |
#45 |
| -
"long debunked": |
Bluebear |
Oct-05-08 03:29 PM |
#48 |
| -
There's something to be said for the easy talking point. |
SmokingJacket |
Oct-05-08 04:07 PM |
#51 |
| -
If the women didn't have insurance or had a high co-pay ... no The Victims Paid. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-05-08 02:11 PM |
#14 |
| -
"Dear Rapists: Choose women without insurance if you want a better chance to get away with it." |
TahitiNut |
Oct-05-08 02:15 PM |
#15 |
| -
One word: DEDUCTIBLE |
beac |
Oct-05-08 02:32 PM |
#19 |
| -
Exactly. And the GOP are pushing these "high deductible" insurances |
mwooldri |
Oct-05-08 04:26 PM |
#54 |
| -
This was big news around here about two weeks ago. |
riverdeep |
Oct-05-08 02:46 PM |
#32 |
| -
Think about these two words; Emergency Contraception |
ismnotwasm |
Oct-05-08 02:48 PM |
#34 |
| -
WTF....WHOEVER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS BULLSHIT IS A PIECE OF EVIL FUCKING SHIT. |
Evoman |
Oct-05-08 03:11 PM |
#44 |
| -
You can BILL insurance, but they won't PAY since this is forensic, not health care.NOT debunked. |
uppityperson |
Oct-05-08 03:27 PM |
#46 |
| -
I made a poll for you to help see if this explanation is sufficient. |
ColbertWatcher |
Oct-05-08 03:54 PM |
#50 |
| -
Debunking the "Debunkers": Palin knew. She approved. She's responsible. |
philosophie_en_rose |
Oct-05-08 04:58 PM |
#55 |
| -
What if they don't have insurance? n/t |
renie408 |
Oct-05-08 06:51 PM |
#57 |
| -
it's the SAME FUCKING THING and seems even worse |
JI7 |
Oct-05-08 07:11 PM |
#58 |
| -
Yes, because now the insurance company KNOWS YOUR BUSINESS |
WakeMeUp |
Oct-05-08 09:16 PM |
#60 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread