CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-11-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
Really. Did you think all of us in CT were just waiting breathlessly for Joe to proclaim himself an "independent Democrat"?
where DO you get your ideas, Bloo? Perhaps our terribly unsophisicated thinkers here could benefit more by a more detailed analysis. My friends at Yale will be so interested.
|
| -I'm tired of hearing the Democrats whining about the war.... |
Postman |
Mar-11-07 05:13 PM |
#0 |
-
You can thank the fuckwipe Connecticut electoare for a lot of this. |
BlooInBloo |
Mar-11-07 05:14 PM |
#1 |
 -
seriously. forget that business about being hamstrung by lieberman. |
bullimiami |
Mar-11-07 05:22 PM |
#5 |
 -
As a foot soldier for Ned Lamont, I am more than willing to admit that CT voters |
CTyankee |
Mar-11-07 05:45 PM |
#11 |
-
Also surely one has to give some blame to the voters of other states who elected the 49 Republican |
LeftishBrit |
Mar-11-07 05:52 PM |
#12 |
 -
Some, but not as much. Those other states didn't *change party*.... |
BlooInBloo |
Mar-11-07 06:24 PM |
#14 |
-
Well, thank you. I don't know what state you are from but |
CTyankee |
Mar-11-07 07:10 PM |
#16 |
 -
It's hard to tell if you *sincerely* don't get it, or if you're just pretending... |
BlooInBloo |
Mar-11-07 08:09 PM |
#18 |
-
Oh, dear , Bloo |
CTyankee |
Mar-11-07 07:24 PM |
#17 |
-
The CT electorate elected him (tautology), hence I criticize the CT electorate.... |
BlooInBloo |
Mar-11-07 06:22 PM |
#13 |
-
Rather than being so contemptuous of our state, you might try |
CTyankee |
Mar-12-07 04:06 PM |
#22 |
-
The state's fine. It's the state's electorate I'm contemptuous of.... |
BlooInBloo |
Mar-12-07 06:02 PM |
#23 |
-
I was only trying to get you to understand what happened in CT |
CTyankee |
Mar-12-07 07:01 PM |
#24 |
-
I'm sure the Katrina victims, getting no relief or investigation, hearts BLEED for you and the... |
BlooInBloo |
Mar-12-07 07:06 PM |
#25 |
-
BUT we tried! We were conscientious. I think we did our duty as citizens. |
CTyankee |
Mar-12-07 07:19 PM |
#26 |
-
Before the decider-in-chief |
PDJane |
Mar-11-07 05:15 PM |
#2 |
-
Not one red cent could be spent on this war without the consent |
cosmik debris |
Mar-11-07 05:19 PM |
#3 |
-
truth is----we do not have the votes (in the senate) |
rodeodance |
Mar-11-07 05:21 PM |
#4 |
 -
truth is. they dont have the votes to pass ANY budget. only the dems do. |
bullimiami |
Mar-11-07 05:24 PM |
#6 |
 -
True. |
edhopper |
Mar-11-07 05:24 PM |
#7 |
  -
If that's case, don't we then have Hagel in our backpocket |
Rusty MacHenry |
Mar-11-07 05:31 PM |
#10 |
 -
Hi Rusty MacHenry!! |
newyawker99 |
Mar-12-07 09:32 AM |
#20 |
 -
We don't need the senate |
cosmik debris |
Mar-11-07 05:30 PM |
#9 |
-
yet, Bush would still have command over the forces |
bigtree |
Mar-12-07 09:55 AM |
#21 |
-
You need to study up how the system works. |
theoldman |
Mar-11-07 05:28 PM |
#8 |
 -
Then they need to get the majority. |
trashcanistanista |
Mar-11-07 09:08 PM |
#19 |
-
Exactly Right! |
demrabble |
Mar-11-07 06:41 PM |
#15 |
-
The majority isn't the only thing on their side, so is the constitution |
ends_dont_justify |
Mar-12-07 07:23 PM |
#27 |