You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #30: Ivins - Sole Culprit Not Possible [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Ennealogic Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
30. Ivins - Sole Culprit Not Possible
Here's what the FBI cannot show about Dr. Bruce Ivins:
  1. That he had the knowledge of how to make the anthrax used (extremely pure, extremely tiny particles, "weaponized" with polyglass type coating and electrostatic charges so that it basically "floated" out of the envelope)
  2. That he had access to equipment needed to make anthrax used (requires a LOT more than the "lyophilizer" that is standard equipment in any bio-science lab)
  3. That he had the opportunity to make the anthrax used (per his co-workers, the process would take weeks if not months, not something that would have gone unnoticed, even if he could have made it)
  4. That he had the opportunity to drive the 320 mile round trip on days anthrax was mailed (you can't drive 7-8 hours round trip overnight and show up for work the next day on time, which is what the FBI says today -- they must've read the blogs that pointed out their original supposition was bogus, which was that Ivins made the trip during admin leave hours on 9-17-2001, but the postmark of 9-18 made that impossible)
  5. That he failed a polygraph (Ivins was one of the first set of people screened, and assisted the FBI in their investigation for years after passing this screening)
  6. That his handwriting matched the letters (they say since the author used block letters, they were stumped and couldn't match handwriting.. hahaha)
  7. That his psychological profile matched that of their suspect (at worst, Ivins was a suicidal paranoid type but what the FBI was profiling was a homicidal sociopath)
  8. That he had a supportable motive for doing it (sending anthrax letters near a sorority storage building because he had an obsession for it? targeting Democratic Senators because he was pro-life and they weren't? that doesn't explain the letters to media!? insuring royalties from vaccine patent which only netted maybe 2K a year? All BS!)


They are making it up as they go along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC