You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: Then there's the question of the copier [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. Then there's the question of the copier
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 10:20 AM by Mabus
I was looking at old articles and read in numerous articles that the FBI found the copier used to copy the anthrax letters and that the copier was publicly accessible. I mentioned it to a few other DU'ers and suffragette came up with a good example of the copier being mentioned and showing it was reported and/or known. From 2002, The American Prospect (excerpted below):

Identifying the lab from which the anthrax in the letters originated will supply one major piece of the puzzle. But investigators point out that this information is far from sufficient. Indeed, the classic criminal investigator's questions -- who had not just the weapon, but the motive and the opportunity? -- will most likely be addressed by those gumshoe special agents out in the field questioning people, gathering testimony, and testing hypotheses. Already investigators have identified the Xerox machine used to photocopy the letters sent to Democratic senators, NBC, and the New York Post last fall, a source close to the investigation said. The machine is "publicly accessible" and is in New Jersey, but in what town or what facility was not disclosed.

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_enemy_w...



So, if they know which copier was used why haven't tied Ivins to it or its location? Wouldn't that help the FBI's case? Or is it not being mentioned because they weren't able to tie Ivins to it?

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC