You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: Higher premiums would be justified in a number of other situations as well. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Higher premiums would be justified in a number of other situations as well.
People who play sports should pay a higher premium, as do those who drive their vehicles more frequently than average. People who drink should pay more than teetotalers. As should those with a family history of disease. Granted, some of these things are already taken into consideration when doing underwriting but this $50 surcharge seems pretty arbitrary. Should a person who smokes 3 cigarettes a day have to pay the same premium as a person who smokes 3 packs? Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC