You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #157: Your "conspiracy theories", by which I assume you mean wild and unfounded theories of loonies, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #98
157. Your "conspiracy theories", by which I assume you mean wild and unfounded theories of loonies,
is a construct that would be very useful to a government that wishes to get away with murder and also by people who help them do so, either unwittingly or not. Perhaps you will consider this also a "conspiracy theory", but it appears that there is a pattern of our government (or elements thereof) promoting that very construct of "conspiracy theories" and using it for that very aim of getting away with murder.

When I see that "" version used, it is almost always an attempt to derail a substantive and logical treatment of a particular question by repeatedly ridiculing the very idea of it. Many times this ploy aimed at avoiding meaningful discussion is used in a discussion forum where meaningful discussion is the one and only goal.

Ironically, the only way to distinguish whether a given instance is a conspiracy theory or a "conspiracy theory" is to delve into the facts and logic and ferret it out. So the "conspiracy theory" construct has no value in the discussion; it only serves to distract from and delay the real work of getting down to the question.

The theory in the original post is not so obviously in the former of your two categories (if I correctly get your meaning). The evidence for it is all circumstantial. It sounds pretty plausible to me but it is not different, really, from many of the other theories that are typically attacked with the "conspiracy theory" meme.

I don't know which theories you mean to attack and slur -- maybe they are the same theories that I might also find loony, maybe not. But I urge you, if you are a person of good will, to not use this construct or at least to use it very sparingly and reluctantly because it is the enemy of meaningful discussion and you are in a discussion forum. A much more helpful and good neighborly approach in a discussion forum is to attack theories with facts and logic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC