You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #53: Well, I'm not a Republican...but I'm not a lockstep Democrat either. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
2KS2KHonda Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Well, I'm not a Republican...but I'm not a lockstep Democrat either.
Maybe that's enough to get me booted off here....I don't know. I fully support the -entire- Bill of Rights and if including the Second Amendment in that displeases the powers that be hereabouts, then I guess I should go elsewhere. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Oil companies already have 68 million arces of public lands they haven't even drilled on. redqueen  Aug-01-08 04:13 PM   #0 
  - Honey, we are just a primitive species  texastoast   Aug-01-08 04:19 PM   #1 
  - Guess this is just another route the stupid in this country is going to take us down  magellan   Aug-01-08 04:20 PM   #2 
  - The only people who buy the "liberal media" crap are those compared to whom it IS liberal.  nomorenomore08   Aug-01-08 04:20 PM   #3 
  - Please don't think I am defending oil companies, but you can't just pick an acre at random,  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 04:21 PM   #4 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Aug-01-08 04:22 PM   #6 
  - Thank you! I certainly hope to.  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 04:27 PM   #11 
  - If God wants us to have it, it will be there. n/t  magellan   Aug-01-08 04:23 PM   #7 
  - Wel, He put quite a bit inside whales too...  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 04:28 PM   #12 
  - There IS oil in some of that acreage, but it's not economic to extract it  Dreamer Tatum   Aug-01-08 04:25 PM   #10 
  - Yes. If it takes 1.2 bbls to raise 1.1 bbl, it's probably not the most brilliant thing  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 04:29 PM   #14 
  - Well, don't they want to pick some place off shore and basically drill at random? Also, it  EV_Ares   Aug-01-08 04:39 PM   #16 
  - Well, drilling "at random" is pretty much what Dubya did with 4 different companies...  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 04:46 PM   #21 
     - Yes which is what I am saying; they have all these thousands of acres they can look at first,  EV_Ares   Aug-01-08 04:48 PM   #22 
        - Well, it depends on what you mean by "use" them! If there's no oil or gas  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 04:56 PM   #27 
  - Then why are they leasing it?  ThoughtCriminal   Aug-01-08 04:44 PM   # 
  - A lot of property is leased for something like a dollar per acre per year.  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 04:50 PM   #24 
  - Maybe not but they have all those thousands of acres leased for drilling so they can go ahead and  EV_Ares   Aug-01-08 05:10 PM   #31 
     - Not sure what you mean "lose it" mean forfeit the leases? If they do that, someone ELSE will  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 05:13 PM   #35 
        - I am talking about what Pelosi and several other dem leaders said. They are leasing this land  EV_Ares   Aug-01-08 05:21 PM   #41 
        - I guess I'll just have to risk being called a freeper troll but how is this any different  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 05:47 PM   #44 
           - Just because investment and speculation are not inherently evil...  BalancedGoat   Aug-01-08 06:36 PM   #64 
              - So you want someone to extract the energy...on public land...including the Alaska wilderness?  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 06:42 PM   #66 
                 - Edited.  BalancedGoat   Aug-01-08 06:50 PM   #70 
                    - No problem, I AGREE. They SHOULD drill in those areas as you suggest!  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 06:52 PM   #72 
                       - Who said we were fighting?  BalancedGoat   Aug-01-08 07:08 PM   #81 
        - It order to keep the leases the law would require "diligent development"  BalancedGoat   Aug-01-08 06:32 PM   #62 
           - Okay, fine...your proposal will have to be a little more specific:  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 06:40 PM   #65 
              - It's not my proposal.  BalancedGoat   Aug-01-08 07:00 PM   #75 
                 - Oh, I realize that, but you were seeming to defend those provisions and you didn't address my  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 07:08 PM   #79 
                    - I don't know the specifics.  BalancedGoat   Aug-01-08 07:21 PM   #89 
                       - Turns out the legislation wouldn't define "diligent development".  BalancedGoat   Aug-01-08 07:29 PM   #92 
                       - Well, aside from the impossibilit;y of defining "diligent development"  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 07:40 PM   #94 
                          - The specifics would have to be hammered out.  BalancedGoat   Aug-01-08 08:01 PM   #98 
                             - It's hard for me to discuss this wit;hout seeming to be an apologist for energy crooks!  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 08:15 PM   #101 
                                - I tried to pare down the question so it was easy to answer.  BalancedGoat   Aug-01-08 09:34 PM   #104 
  - Good question which is what I am talking about in another post. Besides how can you believe  EV_Ares   Aug-01-08 04:50 PM   #25 
     - Anyone who believes them or their shills is an idiot. (nt)  redqueen   Aug-01-08 04:55 PM   #26 
  - No, but you might be able to sucker some chump into thinking there's something in that hole,  fla nocount   Aug-01-08 07:48 PM   #96 
  - I wonder how many Iraqi's have something in common with my Grandma, or will. n/t  fla nocount   Aug-01-08 10:33 PM   #111 
  - Oh I know! The poor oil companies have only 68,000.000 acres available !  Overseas   Aug-02-08 01:10 PM   #113 
  - I think big oil is sitting on that land to  blues90   Aug-01-08 04:22 PM   #5 
  - I think so too. But little do they know how little land it would take to supply all our electricity.  nomorenomore08   Aug-01-08 04:25 PM   #9 
  - Just how would that power be transmitted to where people live?  bamalib   Aug-01-08 07:16 PM   #85 
     - They would pack it in styrofoam cooler boxes  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 07:20 PM   #88 
     - That was a hypothetical example.  nomorenomore08   Aug-01-08 09:39 PM   #105 
        - In the real world neither wind or sun is reliable in most of the U.S.  bamalib   Aug-02-08 04:15 PM   #114 
  - aren't most of the leases simply for the "mineral rights" to take the oil out of the ground.  QuestionAll   Aug-01-08 06:10 PM   #57 
     - I'm not sure , but this land is leased  blues90   Aug-01-08 07:00 PM   #76 
  - The Oil Party=GOP... make it stick DU  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 04:23 PM   #8 
  - where specifically are those lands located, and how much of it is known to have oil?  QuestionAll   Aug-01-08 04:29 PM   #13 
  - Too much logic in that question  tammywammy   Aug-01-08 04:40 PM   #18 
  - Almost all leased tracts that are -known- to have oil are being produced or explored.  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 04:41 PM   #19 
  - self-delet dupe post  QuestionAll   Aug-01-08 04:30 PM   #15 
  - Solar panels instead of oil?  Disturbed   Aug-01-08 04:40 PM   #17 
  - the more important issue is what the oil companies will do with whatever oil . . .  OneBlueSky   Aug-01-08 04:44 PM   #20 
  - Exactly! Why haven't they built or modernized any refineries?  redqueen   Aug-01-08 04:49 PM   #23 
     - My brother in law works at a refinery that spent one billion upgrading this year.  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 05:01 PM   #29 
        - I bet he does!  redqueen   Aug-01-08 05:07 PM   #30 
        - Well, there are some faux-progressives who would love it if they shut down and tossed him out of  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 05:12 PM   #34 
           - And I'm SURE you're JUST the person to decide  redqueen   Aug-01-08 05:17 PM   #38 
              - Well, that is every bit a legitimate possibility as your speculation about me.  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 05:53 PM   #45 
        - I have family that works in the refinerines in SE Texas  tammywammy   Aug-01-08 05:10 PM   #32 
           - Shocking!  redqueen   Aug-01-08 05:11 PM   #33 
              - Why is it shocking? Are you unhappy because people have good jobs  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 05:17 PM   #36 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   Aug-01-08 05:18 PM   #40 
              - I gather you think I should be tossed off here because I express an opinion  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 05:43 PM   #43 
                 - no because they think you are a Republican  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 05:58 PM   #52 
                    - Well, I'm not a Republican...but I'm not a lockstep Democrat either.  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 06:02 PM   #53 
                       - The Second Amendment doesn't Apply to Privately owned Web Sites  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 06:21 PM   #59 
                          - What's the difference between public and private land in this case?  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 06:31 PM   #61 
                             - If You Don't Know the Difference I will Assume You Don't Want to Know  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 06:42 PM   #67 
                                - Oh, I get it. You don't think ANY public land should be used to produce energy.  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 06:51 PM   #71 
                                   - I posted a link below refuting your talking points about Drilling Benefiting America  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 06:57 PM   #73 
                                      - That's pretty funny. I don't want "that land"...and you ain't getting my guns.  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 07:05 PM   #78 
                                         - LOL.... You LOSE. You can keep them and stroke them all you want  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 07:10 PM   #82 
                                            - Giggle. In your wildest wet dreams, goober.  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 07:15 PM   #84 
                                               - awwwwwwww  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 07:17 PM   #86 
              - Haven't seen where anyone is unhappy about people having jobs. You don't  EV_Ares   Aug-01-08 05:30 PM   #42 
                 - I am absolutely opposed to most offshore drilling! Where did you get that completely wrong  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 05:56 PM   #47 
                    - Maybe not. Glad to hear you are opposed. eom.  EV_Ares   Aug-01-08 05:57 PM   #49 
              - That I have family that works in them or that they're "good jobs"? n/t  tammywammy   Aug-01-08 05:17 PM   #37 
              - Nope... just...  redqueen   Aug-01-08 05:17 PM   #39 
                 - Ah. Like Rorshach pictures.  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 05:57 PM   #50 
                 - Believe what you want  tammywammy   Aug-01-08 06:07 PM   #55 
              - lol...  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 05:58 PM   #51 
  - 68 million acres = 106,216 square miles=the size of these 2 states combined  Ichingcarpenter   Aug-01-08 05:00 PM   #28 
  - Yeah, they sit on their hands and ask for more land when there is no evidence  EV_Ares   Aug-01-08 05:55 PM   #46 
  - $$$$$$$$  proud patriot   Aug-01-08 05:56 PM   #48 
  - Money but also Trying to set a Precedent to take away from the Commons  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 06:03 PM   #54 
     - But but but... the jobs!  redqueen   Aug-01-08 06:09 PM   #56 
        - Send McCain your resume'. He doesn't give a shit about folks having jobs either.  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 06:11 PM   #58 
           - I Know Redqueen and that Person is a Progressive  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 06:25 PM   #60 
              - I'm no lobbyist but I am an oilman. On a tiny scale. I worked my butt off for 4 decades  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 06:34 PM   #63 
                 - That's the problem...more drilling on our public lands will not solve our problems  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 06:44 PM   #68 
                 - That's actually very amusing. I've been replying to people here who say "use it or lose it"  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 07:03 PM   #77 
                    - you know what's really amusing... your obtuse behavior  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 07:08 PM   #80 
                       - You REALLY think the US gov't under an Obama administration wouldn't gladly  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 07:19 PM   #87 
                          - PS - OUR PUBLIC LANDS  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 07:22 PM   #90 
                             - So...what is your point? Public land is managed by the government.  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 07:27 PM   #91 
                                - OUR PUBLIC LANDS: not for private profiting or exploitation  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 07:37 PM   #93 
                                   - Okay, I guess I'd like you to tell me how "big" a company is allowed to be before it becomes  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 07:44 PM   #95 
                                      - not what we are talking about... bait and switch  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 07:54 PM   #97 
                                         - Your pdf link is a dead end. Much like your irrational hate of people who work to produce  2KS2KHonda   Aug-01-08 08:05 PM   #99 
                                            - shucks for you... it's back  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 09:51 PM   #109 
                 - Here's a PDF for you and All DUers to Read about the Myth you are parroting  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 06:49 PM   #69 
                    - ....  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 07:13 PM   #83 
                    - Page not found  dems_rightnow   Aug-01-08 09:45 PM   #106 
                    - it's baaaack  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 09:50 PM   #108 
                    - Here's the updated link  fascisthunter   Aug-01-08 09:49 PM   #107 
                    - I think the original got tangled up & won't post right.  djmaddox1   Aug-01-08 10:07 PM   #110 
                       - #107 works  fascisthunter   Aug-02-08 01:03 PM   #112 
  - Big Oil wants ALL the Land, and there are faster ways to get more oil  StarfishParable   Aug-01-08 06:59 PM   #74 
  - redqueen  JustAnotherGen   Aug-01-08 08:08 PM   #100 
  - Well it's not like they don't have precedent to go on...  redqueen   Aug-01-08 08:22 PM   #102 
     - EXACTLY  JustAnotherGen   Aug-01-08 08:26 PM   #103 
  - Some honest info folks  Nunyadb   Aug-02-08 04:29 PM   #115 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC