You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #46: Bruce Fein and Glen Greenwald on Cass Sunstein and more... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
46. Bruce Fein and Glen Greenwald on Cass Sunstein and more...

"...Yesterday, Jane Hamsher spoke with Bruce Fein on BloggingheadsTV about why the Democrats have, in general, failed to hold the Bush administration accountable for their multiple crimes (Slate yesterday detailed some of the many Bush crimes). Here is what Fein -- echoing an argument I made a couple of weeks ago -- said on that topic:

see video at link

Jane also asked Fein about Obama adviser Cass Sunstein's recent statements that Bush officials should not be prosecuted for their illegal detention, interrogation and spying programs. To get a sense for why this matters, National Journal this morning listed Sunstein as one of a small handful of likely Supreme Court appointees in an Obama administration. But -- similar to Fein's point regarding Jay Rockefeller, Jane Harman and comrades -- Sunstein has long been one of the most vocal enablers of Bush radicalism and lawlessness, having continuously offered himself up over the last seven years to play the legal version of the TNR role of "even-liberal-Cass-Sunstein-agrees-with-Bush."

During my Democracy Now debate with him, Sunstein said: "I'd be honored but surprised if the military commissions cite some of my academic articles." But as Talk Left's Armando documented, Sunstein would be an ideal and highly likely "legal scholar" for the Bush administration to cite as part of its military tribunals, as Sunstein was an early and outspoken supporter of the theory that Bush had the authority to order military commissions (a theory which the Supreme Court rejected in Hamdan). Identically, while Sunstein now pretends to disagree with Bush's theory as to why he had the power to spy on Americans in violation of the law (Sunstein said on Democracy Now: "while I agree with Senator Feingold that the President's position is wrong"), Sunstein defended those theories as "very reasonable" when he was on right-wing talk radio with Hugh Hewitt in late 2005 during the height of the NSA controversy.

It's really hard to imagine a worse person on whom Obama could be relying as a legal adviser, let alone a potential Supreme Court nominee, and here is what Fein had to say about Sunstein's view of things:..."

see link for video

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -How Should the Next President Deal with the Bush White House's Crimes? Octafish  Jul-26-08 11:41 AM   #0 
  - K&R  Solly Mack   Jul-26-08 11:44 AM   #1 
  - Truth and Reconciliation Commission?  Octafish   Jul-26-08 12:59 PM   #22 
     - That would have to involve the victims of America's crimes, yes?  Solly Mack   Jul-26-08 04:37 PM   #58 
     - Excellent points, Solly Mack.  Octafish   Jul-26-08 09:40 PM   #73 
        - The full truth can come out in a trial  Solly Mack   Jul-27-08 08:27 AM   #105 
     - Truth Commissions are only appropriate in post civil-war situations, when trials would spark  leveymg   Jul-27-08 06:00 AM   #93 
     - Weak. that;s not NEARLY enough.  Phred42   Jul-27-08 08:20 AM   #101 
     - We Prefer Truth and Consequences!  Demeter   Jul-27-08 11:55 AM   #124 
  - Hang the bastards! nt  tmfun   Jul-26-08 11:46 AM   #2 
  - The Rosenbergs got the electric chair in 1953.  Octafish   Jul-26-08 01:03 PM   #23 
  - indicte, imprison..........  PDJane   Jul-26-08 11:46 AM   #3 
  - Gov. Siegelman would make an excellent Special Prosecutor.  Octafish   Jul-26-08 01:13 PM   #26 
  - Try them for treason and execute those who are found guilty  tularetom   Jul-26-08 11:49 AM   #4 
  - Speaking of goats...  Octafish   Jul-26-08 09:49 PM   #74 
  - as a traditionalist, I kind of like tar and feathers, myself  wordpix   Jul-27-08 08:19 AM   #100 
  - By Impeaching Nancy Pelocy for not doing her constitutional duty  FreakinDJ   Jul-26-08 11:49 AM   #5 
  - Pelosi cannot be impeached.  Thothmes   Jul-26-08 07:02 PM   #63 
  - Can you clarify? In Friday's hearing "around" impeachment ...  puebloknot   Jul-27-08 02:44 AM   #87 
     - Maybe someone doesn't know what they're talking about  madokie   Jul-27-08 06:51 AM   #96 
     - Yes. John Dean wrote an article pointing to the possible "wisdom" ...  puebloknot   Jul-27-08 02:42 PM   #133 
     - Because there's already a process in the Constitution for Members of Congress:  NYC Liberal   Jul-27-08 10:46 AM   #118 
        - Please do elaborate on the expulsion process you speak of.  puebloknot   Jul-27-08 02:54 PM   #134 
           - You don't know about expelling a member of Congress?  NYC Liberal   Jul-27-08 03:31 PM   #136 
              - It won't happen. And if it *were* undertaken ...  puebloknot   Jul-28-08 06:59 PM   #142 
                 - It's public record just like anything else  NYC Liberal   Jul-29-08 09:25 AM   #144 
  - Perhaps what we need to do is show her what we're talking about...  Octafish   Jul-26-08 10:00 PM   #76 
     - great link. thanks. but I doubt that Nanci would  bbgrunt   Jul-27-08 08:52 AM   #107 
  - K&R  lynettebro440   Jul-26-08 11:54 AM   #6 
  - Bush-Cheney crony got Iraq oil deal  Octafish   Jul-26-08 10:29 PM   #78 
  - off to the greatest page you go! K & enthusiastically R'd!!!  peacebird   Jul-26-08 11:55 AM   #7 
  - He should investigate for a while, then begin prosecution 8-9 months before midterm elections.  anonymous171   Jul-26-08 11:57 AM   #8 
  - Greenwald for AG  IDemo   Jul-26-08 12:00 PM   #9 
  - Investigate  bigwillq   Jul-26-08 12:02 PM   #10 
  - i hope that everyone realizes that NOTHING is going to be done to/about the cheney misadministration  QuestionAll   Jul-26-08 12:04 PM   #11 
  - I wouldn't even bet a cold cup of coffee against that.  exothermic   Jul-26-08 12:14 PM   #15 
  - Sad but True  FreakinDJ   Jul-26-08 12:15 PM   #16 
  - Absolutely.  Blue_In_AK   Jul-26-08 12:31 PM   #21 
  - I know, you all keep saying that, but after yesterday, I have reason to think otherwise.  Independent_Liberal   Jul-26-08 02:07 PM   #40 
  - why is that?  QuestionAll   Jul-26-08 07:22 PM   #65 
     - Perhaps I'm a bit of an optimist, but...  Independent_Liberal   Jul-26-08 08:19 PM   #66 
        - i do disagree.  QuestionAll   Jul-26-08 08:41 PM   #67 
  - they market the "Democrat vs. Republican" sports team imagery  datasuspect   Jul-26-08 03:54 PM   #56 
  - First off, let's not repeat the mistakes of the past  Canuckistanian   Jul-26-08 12:08 PM   #12 
  - I'm hoping for the Hague, myself.  intheflow   Jul-26-08 12:11 PM   #13 
  - The question is "will" not "should." If it's a Republican, nothing. If it's a Democrat,  exothermic   Jul-26-08 12:14 PM   #14 
  - Urge Congress to do its job nt  LiberalEsto   Jul-26-08 12:17 PM   #17 
  - Turn all docs over the Den Haage. and let them weigh in. Or name the jerks as "enemy combatants" &  elehhhhna   Jul-26-08 12:24 PM   #18 
  - Put them all in prison. If we don't, they'll do this again. They'll be back  Joanne98   Jul-26-08 12:29 PM   #19 
  - They'll be back and in the Congressional Ethics Office like Porter Goss.  sfexpat2000   Jul-26-08 01:08 PM   #25 
     - Oh I know! That's so depressing.  Joanne98   Jul-26-08 01:53 PM   #37 
  - They should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law  Blue_In_AK   Jul-26-08 12:30 PM   #20 
  - There won't be anything dealt with it seems.  mmonk   Jul-26-08 01:07 PM   #24 
  - Are we sure that crimes have been committed?  slipslidingaway   Jul-26-08 01:16 PM   #27 
  - If Democratic party leaders say there is some question  mmonk   Jul-26-08 01:18 PM   #28 
     - Well then there must not have been, maybe they were just really  slipslidingaway   Jul-26-08 01:34 PM   #33 
        - I was kidding. Of course there were clear crimes  mmonk   Jul-26-08 01:44 PM   #36 
           - Except that at least one leader in our party is not sure if crimes  slipslidingaway   Jul-26-08 02:16 PM   #44 
              - I know.  mmonk   Jul-26-08 02:42 PM   #45 
              - OK and Cass Sunstein for Supreme court???  slipslidingaway   Jul-26-08 03:03 PM   #48 
                 - Let's hope your update is true it's not certain.  mmonk   Jul-26-08 03:14 PM   #49 
                    - Yes, here is the embedded link to the National Journal article,  slipslidingaway   Jul-26-08 03:18 PM   #51 
                       - Disturbing.  mmonk   Jul-26-08 03:24 PM   #52 
                          - :(( n/t  slipslidingaway   Jul-26-08 03:37 PM   #53 
                             - this is NOT a good sign. I share your :((( and raise you a (.  bbgrunt   Jul-27-08 09:01 AM   #109 
                                - :)))) Agree and posting the links below as a reference for later...  slipslidingaway   Jul-27-08 11:40 AM   #122 
              - The bright line is intent  realpolitik   Jul-27-08 12:08 PM   #126 
  - I'll bet you $1000 that he does exactly what Clinton did, nothing.  greyhound1966   Jul-26-08 01:28 PM   #29 
  - I wouldn't take you up on that bet.  happydreams   Jul-26-08 01:33 PM   #32 
     - You do have to watch what you say around here sometimes. n/t  Blue_In_AK   Jul-26-08 02:00 PM   #38 
        - "watch what you say"....  happydreams   Jul-27-08 04:57 PM   #138 
  - "Crimes" is the key word. "rule of law" Follow where the clues lead  Fuzz   Jul-26-08 01:31 PM   #30 
  - Bill Hicks had it right  RufusTFirefly   Jul-26-08 01:33 PM   #31 
  - Yes, Bill Hicks did have it right. Watch. n/t  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-08 01:43 AM   #81 
     - Reminds me of ...  flashl   Jul-27-08 08:39 AM   #106 
        - Precisely. n/t  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-08 09:55 AM   #115 
  - Cass Sunstein lifts the tent for the camel's nose  bleever   Jul-26-08 01:38 PM   #34 
  - Do you have a reason to believe we should remain  Pastiche423   Jul-26-08 06:21 PM   #60 
  - Yes,  bleever   Jul-27-08 01:42 AM   #80 
     - That's not what I meant.  Pastiche423   Jul-27-08 04:09 AM   #92 
        - I guess my view is that we should push for him to do the right thing,  bleever   Jul-27-08 01:34 PM   #130 
           - I believe you are right  Pastiche423   Jul-27-08 01:53 PM   #131 
  - bleever, Bill clinton was a very smart fellow as well but sold out our rule of law  mod mom   Jul-27-08 09:01 AM   #108 
     - I agree, mod mom.  bleever   Jul-27-08 01:31 PM   #129 
  - Bush and Cheney need to be turned over to the ICC.  Usrename   Jul-26-08 01:43 PM   #35 
  - I agree that our courts AND our political leaders  bbgrunt   Jul-27-08 09:18 AM   #110 
  - Two words  sellitman   Jul-26-08 02:01 PM   #39 
  - And then we have no grassroots movement who is writing to Congress or the press about this matter  TheBorealAvenger   Jul-26-08 02:11 PM   #41 
  - Rendition Flights To Gitmo  Me.   Jul-26-08 02:15 PM   #42 
  - They also have the right to hang themselves for dessert making it their last meal  mmonk   Jul-26-08 03:50 PM   #55 
  - I wish Glenn Greenwald (whom I respect) wouldn't call it the Iran-Contra scandal.  ArbustoBuster   Jul-26-08 02:15 PM   #43 
  - And I agree with you.  Enthusiast   Jul-27-08 09:18 AM   #111 
  - Bruce Fein and Glen Greenwald on Cass Sunstein and more...  slipslidingaway   Jul-26-08 02:56 PM   #46 
  - WTF? according to Cass Sunstein, * can get away with violating the constitution as long as he  mod mom   Jul-26-08 02:57 PM   #47 
  - Sunstein is beginning to give me nightmares.  bbgrunt   Jul-27-08 09:23 AM   #112 
  - I agree. Investigate and prosecute and sentence the guilty and RESTORE  Overseas   Jul-26-08 03:17 PM   #50 
  - Prosecute  Prophet 451   Jul-26-08 03:47 PM   #54 
  - Ray Of Hope  Me.   Jul-26-08 04:00 PM   #57 
  - We already have a process for dealing with them, impeachment.  Edweird   Jul-26-08 04:55 PM   #59 
  - While it's fun to dream, here's the reality.  JNelson6563   Jul-26-08 06:36 PM   #61 
  - Investigation, prosecution, revocation of citizenship, ostracism.  sofa king   Jul-26-08 06:42 PM   #62 
  - Investigate all the way back to the Y2K selections.  lpbk2713   Jul-26-08 07:06 PM   #64 
  - .  mopinko   Jul-26-08 08:43 PM   #68 
  - Your Images Are My Dreams  Care   Jul-27-08 02:12 AM   #84 
  - Arrest, Indict, Prosecute, Imprison  dpbrown   Jul-26-08 08:55 PM   #69 
  - Kick n/t  bonito   Jul-26-08 09:11 PM   #70 
  - In a "One Party" political system, with two right wings, like the one we have....  host   Jul-26-08 09:15 PM   #71 
  - Have every single person  norepubsin08   Jul-26-08 09:24 PM   #72 
  - Subpoenas, Hearings, Indictments, Trials, Verdicts  specimenfred1984   Jul-26-08 09:50 PM   #75 
  - If I Had My Way  Care   Jul-27-08 02:14 AM   #85 
     - The Same Obama that voted for FISA & Telco amnesty and calls it "the war on terror"?  host   Jul-27-08 02:34 AM   #86 
        - No, The Obama That Will Be President.  Care   Jul-27-08 11:45 AM   #123 
        - Moyer's has said what many still fear to say  sattahipdeep   Jul-27-08 12:21 PM   #128 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-27-08 07:43 PM   #140 
  - Seppuku.  jmowreader   Jul-26-08 10:10 PM   #77 
  - Save on prison space  wial   Jul-27-08 01:39 AM   #79 
  - Nice :)  diane in sf   Jul-27-08 03:37 AM   #91 
  - executive order  leftofthedial   Jul-27-08 01:57 AM   #82 
  - Two words...  ImForGore   Jul-27-08 02:09 AM   #83 
  - Did these a few years back....  JawJaw   Jul-27-08 02:51 AM   #88 
  - "Suicides" and "Accidents"  frog92969   Jul-27-08 03:01 AM   #89 
  - Thoroughly and severely--psychopaths have no conscience so it would be very  diane in sf   Jul-27-08 03:30 AM   #90 
  - If McCain Gets in there ..It Ain't Gonna Happen..  Razorblade02   Jul-27-08 06:39 AM   #94 
  - Maybe its time to invest in rope making  madokie   Jul-27-08 06:49 AM   #95 
  - And no pardons!!  Herdin_Cats   Jul-27-08 06:54 AM   #97 
  - What I think will happen  Tab   Jul-27-08 08:10 AM   #98 
  - first we need to IMPEACH BUSH before he PARDONS everyone else  wordpix   Jul-27-08 08:17 AM   #99 
  - Exactly!  Phred42   Jul-27-08 08:20 AM   #102 
  - What if it goes back to big Swiss banks?  Festivito   Jul-27-08 08:22 AM   #103 
  - Should a Bear shit in the woods?  Phred42   Jul-27-08 08:26 AM   #104 
  - They all should be prosecuted, but...  totodeinhere   Jul-27-08 09:36 AM   #113 
  - "Corruption in public office is treason."  formercia   Jul-27-08 09:51 AM   #114 
  - what SHOULD be done ... or what MIGHT to be done?  Martin Eden   Jul-27-08 10:26 AM   #116 
  - Dems don't have the guts to pursue Impeachment  cyclezealot   Jul-27-08 10:37 AM   #117 
  - Prosecute and convict Bushco, then send them  anotheryellowdog   Jul-27-08 11:21 AM   #119 
  - Just a note unrelated to topic, but thought I would share. LOL  lonestarnot   Jul-27-08 11:23 AM   #120 
  - And they stand to be held accountable just like every defendant when sentence is passed!  lonestarnot   Jul-27-08 11:27 AM   #121 
  - "Corruption in public office is treason."  realpolitik   Jul-27-08 11:56 AM   #125 
  - criminalizing policy disputes  klyon   Jul-27-08 12:19 PM   #127 
  - Don't get sucked into that sick web.  cleveramerican   Jul-27-08 02:21 PM   #132 
  - "Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it."  puebloknot   Jul-27-08 03:07 PM   #135 
     - there are a limited number of things any president can accomplish  cleveramerican   Jul-28-08 04:28 PM   #141 
        - "Hope and change" fashioned out of brushing criminality under the rug?  puebloknot   Jul-29-08 04:18 AM   #143 
           - it really is an either/or proposition  cleveramerican   Jul-29-08 02:36 PM   #145 
              - Which is why, if your math is correct, there is a *reason* ...  puebloknot   Jul-29-08 06:30 PM   #146 
  - Cart 'em off to Gitmo sans charge or trail, placing former inmates  DailyGrind51   Jul-27-08 04:19 PM   #137 
  - if nothing is done to put these criminals in prison  blues90   Jul-27-08 05:01 PM   #139 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC