bjobotts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-20-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #61 |
| 62. Won't bring back the dead, but must be severe to prevent others from doing it again. |
| -The party than impeaches wins the next election |
proud2Blib |
Jul-19-08 11:13 PM |
#0 |
-
BRILLIANT! "THE" party with the best candidate will win anyway. nt |
babylonsister |
Jul-19-08 11:15 PM |
#1 |
 -
Every once in awhile I get something fairly decent |
proud2Blib |
Jul-19-08 11:19 PM |
#4 |
-
It's too damn bad the asshole-in-chief has no morals. I'm very serious. |
babylonsister |
Jul-19-08 11:32 PM |
#6 |
-
He's that arrogant |
proud2Blib |
Jul-19-08 11:36 PM |
#7 |
-
He is part of a very bad bunch |
bambino |
Jul-19-08 11:53 PM |
#9 |
-
I've come to the conclusion that |
pipi_k |
Jul-20-08 12:59 PM |
#47 |
-
Unless we impeach, politicians will continue to act without fear of consequences |
bjobotts |
Jul-20-08 04:29 PM |
#57 |
-
Impeachment is the "legal" process but we already know they are guilty |
bjobotts |
Jul-20-08 04:32 PM |
#58 |
-
They've all been caught on tape. Guilty-So what is their punishment |
bjobotts |
Jul-20-08 04:33 PM |
#60 |
-
What is the penalty for arranging mass murder for profit?? |
bjobotts |
Jul-20-08 04:36 PM |
#61 |
-
Won't bring back the dead, but must be severe to prevent others from doing it again. |
bjobotts |
Jul-20-08 04:37 PM |
#62 |
-
Why do you keep answering your own posts? |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-20-08 07:50 PM |
#69 |
-
And to think.... |
danagsk8 |
Jul-19-08 11:16 PM |
#2 |
 -
Woohoo!! |
proud2Blib |
Jul-19-08 11:20 PM |
#5 |
-
Remove Pelosi first |
burythehatchet |
Jul-19-08 11:16 PM |
#3 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-20-08 04:02 AM |
#21 |
 -
I second that |
debunkthelies |
Jul-20-08 02:32 PM |
#54 |
-
Even works for 1868 |
tinrobot |
Jul-19-08 11:49 PM |
#8 |
-
Impeach for Justice! |
trthnd4jstc |
Jul-20-08 12:06 AM |
#10 |
-
I thought we spent the last 7 1/2 years saying Bush *wasn't* elected... |
Richardo |
Jul-20-08 12:10 AM |
#11 |
 -
He's in office |
proud2Blib |
Jul-20-08 12:53 AM |
#13 |
-
Not according to your headline |
Richardo |
Jul-20-08 08:06 AM |
#26 |
-
If impeachment endangers the election, so be it. Returning the rule of law |
rhett o rick |
Jul-20-08 12:17 AM |
#12 |
 -
acquitting him in the Senate will do nothing |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-20-08 02:45 AM |
#18 |
-
Except for justify the last 7 years to far too many in this country |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-20-08 07:46 AM |
#24 |
 -
Exactly. It will exonerate, clear their names and prove no wrongdoing. |
PeaceNikki |
Jul-20-08 08:30 AM |
#28 |
-
So we don't try if we don't think we can win? These people are criminals |
rhett o rick |
Jul-20-08 08:10 AM |
#27 |
-
No, we don't try UNTIL we can win |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-20-08 10:51 AM |
#34 |
 -
That's what I said. How's that been working for yuh? |
rhett o rick |
Jul-20-08 11:37 AM |
#42 |
-
Few such battles have such a clear outcome |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-20-08 01:41 PM |
#50 |
-
No, that's not what you said |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-20-08 04:28 PM |
#56 |
-
Correct me if I am wrong. Impeachment isn't the trial, it is the investigation. |
rhett o rick |
Jul-21-08 11:03 PM |
#82 |
-
No |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-20-08 01:39 PM |
#49 |
-
nope. |
CasualWatcher9 |
Jul-20-08 01:18 AM |
#14 |
 -
You are denying the history |
proud2Blib |
Jul-20-08 02:37 AM |
#16 |
  -
You're inventing history |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-20-08 02:51 AM |
#19 |
 -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jul-20-08 03:37 AM |
#20 |
 -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jul-20-08 08:17 PM |
#72 |
 -
I think that's wrong |
Patchuli |
Jul-20-08 02:42 AM |
#17 |
 -
surrrrre it is |
fascisthunter |
Jul-20-08 11:39 AM |
#44 |
-
k&r'd -- good point -- |
snot |
Jul-20-08 01:36 AM |
#15 |
 -
The simple answer |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-20-08 04:30 AM |
#22 |
-
The party that launches inevitably-doomed impeachment procedings loses it. |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Jul-20-08 06:09 AM |
#23 |
-
Did Bill Clinton get elected because Democrats impeached George Bush? |
Freddie Stubbs |
Jul-20-08 08:03 AM |
#25 |
 -
Just like Reagan got elected because the Republicans impeached Carter. |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-20-08 11:00 AM |
#36 |
-
Or we could just consult the tarot cards. |
PelosiFan |
Jul-20-08 08:34 AM |
#29 |
-
That's true. The excuses given so far are hiding whatever |
mmonk |
Jul-20-08 08:35 AM |
#30 |
-
Or the party embroiled in political or sexual scandel is at a disadvantage |
dmordue |
Jul-20-08 08:36 AM |
#31 |
-
K & R |
lonestarnot |
Jul-20-08 08:36 AM |
#32 |
-
The President in power during a series of moon landings always resigns under threat of impeachment! |
Richardo |
Jul-20-08 08:45 AM |
#33 |
 -
Thanks for kicking the thread |
proud2Blib |
Jul-20-08 11:06 AM |
#37 |
-
N=0. Republicans lost the '98 elections. Nixon wasn't impeached. |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-20-08 11:00 AM |
#35 |
 -
Time for a history lesson! |
proud2Blib |
Jul-20-08 11:14 AM |
#38 |
-
Didn't claim that he wouldn't have been impeached. |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-20-08 11:18 AM |
#39 |
-
And the flier in my op doesn't claim he was impeached |
proud2Blib |
Jul-20-08 11:24 AM |
#41 |
-
True, meaning there are still zero examples of an impeaching party winning the next election. |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-20-08 11:38 AM |
#43 |
-
Clinton was impeached in December of 98. The next election was in November of 00. n/t |
whopis01 |
Jul-20-08 06:41 PM |
#64 |
-
and but for nader and the SCOTUS, Gore would've won. |
onenote |
Jul-20-08 08:11 PM |
#71 |
-
sorry but Dems are not serious |
mina_seward |
Jul-20-08 11:19 AM |
#40 |
-
Awesome.... you Just Dismantled the Dem Establishment's Excuse |
fascisthunter |
Jul-20-08 11:42 AM |
#45 |
 -
You call that a dismantling? |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-21-08 01:35 AM |
#79 |
-
send this to the dems |
Enrique |
Jul-20-08 12:05 PM |
#46 |
 -
here's PDF to fax to them |
davidswanson |
Jul-20-08 01:00 PM |
#48 |
-
Will fax first thing tomorrow |
proud2Blib |
Jul-20-08 01:50 PM |
#51 |
-
I'm sure they could use the laugh. |
Richardo |
Jul-20-08 04:33 PM |
#59 |
-
I'd like to give your post a K&R. |
progressoid |
Jul-20-08 09:54 PM |
#75 |
-
Just sent my tenth pro-impeachment letter to Madam Speaker. |
Overseas |
Jul-20-08 01:54 PM |
#52 |
-
K & R .... |
AzDar |
Jul-20-08 02:16 PM |
#53 |
-
Impeachment reeks of divisive politics |
muryan |
Jul-20-08 03:38 PM |
#55 |
 -
Time for the Constitution to come to an end, too -- |
Beam Me Up |
Jul-20-08 06:19 PM |
#63 |
 -
This is not about partisanship. Have you read the articles of impeachment? |
beammeup |
Jul-20-08 07:24 PM |
#65 |
  -
You want President Cheney |
Richardo |
Jul-20-08 07:26 PM |
#66 |
 -
What "hyper-partisanship"? |
Fumesucker |
Jul-20-08 10:51 PM |
#76 |
-
no - diebold decides |
mdmc |
Jul-20-08 07:27 PM |
#67 |
-
I've been looking at this for almost a whole day now... |
Richardo |
Jul-20-08 07:36 PM |
#68 |
-
that is some bad history. |
onenote |
Jul-20-08 08:08 PM |
#70 |
-
Bush has the lowest approval rating |
WoodyM |
Jul-20-08 08:33 PM |
#73 |
 -
Well said WoodyM. Welcome to DU. nm |
rhett o rick |
Jul-21-08 11:04 PM |
#83 |
-
K&R. |
Vidar |
Jul-20-08 09:22 PM |
#74 |
-
I imagine if the Republicans wanted to gain back some respect, they should impeach Bush |
HughMoran |
Jul-20-08 11:17 PM |
#77 |
-
Gore won the election, Bush stole it |
Hippo_Tron |
Jul-20-08 11:21 PM |
#78 |
-
Oh come on. |
The Liberal Thinker |
Jul-21-08 07:52 AM |
#80 |
-
Embarrassing, isn't it? |
Richardo |
Jul-21-08 09:40 AM |
#81 |