rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-20-08 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 27. So we don't try if we don't think we can win? These people are criminals |
|
and will continue to commit crimes if we don't bring them to justice. We may fail but we must try. If the Senate won't convict, let's expose those that won't. We may fail this time, so we will try again. And if our winning the election hinges on us not doing the right thing, then it was too fragile anyway.
I say we take it to them in every way we can, on every opportunity we can. The last seven years has shown the Democrats to be timid and keeping powder dry, etc. That hasn't helped one bit.
|
| -The party than impeaches wins the next election |
proud2Blib |
Jul-19-08 11:13 PM |
#0 |
 -
BRILLIANT! "THE" party with the best candidate will win anyway. nt |
babylonsister |
Jul-19-08 11:15 PM |
#1 |
  -
Every once in awhile I get something fairly decent |
proud2Blib |
Jul-19-08 11:19 PM |
#4 |
| -
It's too damn bad the asshole-in-chief has no morals. I'm very serious. |
babylonsister |
Jul-19-08 11:32 PM |
#6 |
| -
He's that arrogant |
proud2Blib |
Jul-19-08 11:36 PM |
#7 |
| -
He is part of a very bad bunch |
bambino |
Jul-19-08 11:53 PM |
#9 |
| -
I've come to the conclusion that |
pipi_k |
Jul-20-08 12:59 PM |
#47 |
| -
Unless we impeach, politicians will continue to act without fear of consequences |
bjobotts |
Jul-20-08 04:29 PM |
#57 |
| -
Impeachment is the "legal" process but we already know they are guilty |
bjobotts |
Jul-20-08 04:32 PM |
#58 |
| -
They've all been caught on tape. Guilty-So what is their punishment |
bjobotts |
Jul-20-08 04:33 PM |
#60 |
| -
What is the penalty for arranging mass murder for profit?? |
bjobotts |
Jul-20-08 04:36 PM |
#61 |
| -
Won't bring back the dead, but must be severe to prevent others from doing it again. |
bjobotts |
Jul-20-08 04:37 PM |
#62 |
| -
Why do you keep answering your own posts? |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-20-08 07:50 PM |
#69 |
| -
And to think.... |
danagsk8 |
Jul-19-08 11:16 PM |
#2 |
| -
Woohoo!! |
proud2Blib |
Jul-19-08 11:20 PM |
#5 |
| -
Remove Pelosi first |
burythehatchet |
Jul-19-08 11:16 PM |
#3 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-20-08 04:02 AM |
#21 |
| -
I second that |
debunkthelies |
Jul-20-08 02:32 PM |
#54 |
| -
Even works for 1868 |
tinrobot |
Jul-19-08 11:49 PM |
#8 |
| -
Impeach for Justice! |
trthnd4jstc |
Jul-20-08 12:06 AM |
#10 |
| -
I thought we spent the last 7 1/2 years saying Bush *wasn't* elected... |
Richardo |
Jul-20-08 12:10 AM |
#11 |
| -
He's in office |
proud2Blib |
Jul-20-08 12:53 AM |
#13 |
| -
Not according to your headline |
Richardo |
Jul-20-08 08:06 AM |
#26 |
| -
If impeachment endangers the election, so be it. Returning the rule of law |
rhett o rick |
Jul-20-08 12:17 AM |
#12 |
| -
acquitting him in the Senate will do nothing |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-20-08 02:45 AM |
#18 |
| -
Except for justify the last 7 years to far too many in this country |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-20-08 07:46 AM |
#24 |
| -
Exactly. It will exonerate, clear their names and prove no wrongdoing. |
PeaceNikki |
Jul-20-08 08:30 AM |
#28 |
| -
So we don't try if we don't think we can win? These people are criminals |
rhett o rick |
Jul-20-08 08:10 AM |
#27 |
| -
No, we don't try UNTIL we can win |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-20-08 10:51 AM |
#34 |
| -
That's what I said. How's that been working for yuh? |
rhett o rick |
Jul-20-08 11:37 AM |
#42 |
| -
Few such battles have such a clear outcome |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-20-08 01:41 PM |
#50 |
| -
No, that's not what you said |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-20-08 04:28 PM |
#56 |
| -
Correct me if I am wrong. Impeachment isn't the trial, it is the investigation. |
rhett o rick |
Jul-21-08 11:03 PM |
#82 |
| -
No |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-20-08 01:39 PM |
#49 |
| -
nope. |
CasualWatcher9 |
Jul-20-08 01:18 AM |
#14 |
| -
You are denying the history |
proud2Blib |
Jul-20-08 02:37 AM |
#16 |
| -
You're inventing history |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-20-08 02:51 AM |
#19 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jul-20-08 03:37 AM |
#20 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jul-20-08 08:17 PM |
#72 |
| -
I think that's wrong |
Patchuli |
Jul-20-08 02:42 AM |
#17 |
| -
surrrrre it is |
fascisthunter |
Jul-20-08 11:39 AM |
#44 |
| -
k&r'd -- good point -- |
snot |
Jul-20-08 01:36 AM |
#15 |
| -
The simple answer |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-20-08 04:30 AM |
#22 |
| -
The party that launches inevitably-doomed impeachment procedings loses it. |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Jul-20-08 06:09 AM |
#23 |
| -
Did Bill Clinton get elected because Democrats impeached George Bush? |
Freddie Stubbs |
Jul-20-08 08:03 AM |
#25 |
| -
Just like Reagan got elected because the Republicans impeached Carter. |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-20-08 11:00 AM |
#36 |
| -
Or we could just consult the tarot cards. |
PelosiFan |
Jul-20-08 08:34 AM |
#29 |
| -
That's true. The excuses given so far are hiding whatever |
mmonk |
Jul-20-08 08:35 AM |
#30 |
| -
Or the party embroiled in political or sexual scandel is at a disadvantage |
dmordue |
Jul-20-08 08:36 AM |
#31 |
| -
K & R |
lonestarnot |
Jul-20-08 08:36 AM |
#32 |
| -
The President in power during a series of moon landings always resigns under threat of impeachment! |
Richardo |
Jul-20-08 08:45 AM |
#33 |
| -
Thanks for kicking the thread |
proud2Blib |
Jul-20-08 11:06 AM |
#37 |
| -
N=0. Republicans lost the '98 elections. Nixon wasn't impeached. |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-20-08 11:00 AM |
#35 |
| -
Time for a history lesson! |
proud2Blib |
Jul-20-08 11:14 AM |
#38 |
| -
Didn't claim that he wouldn't have been impeached. |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-20-08 11:18 AM |
#39 |
| -
And the flier in my op doesn't claim he was impeached |
proud2Blib |
Jul-20-08 11:24 AM |
#41 |
| -
True, meaning there are still zero examples of an impeaching party winning the next election. |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-20-08 11:38 AM |
#43 |
| -
Clinton was impeached in December of 98. The next election was in November of 00. n/t |
whopis01 |
Jul-20-08 06:41 PM |
#64 |
| -
and but for nader and the SCOTUS, Gore would've won. |
onenote |
Jul-20-08 08:11 PM |
#71 |
| -
sorry but Dems are not serious |
mina_seward |
Jul-20-08 11:19 AM |
#40 |
| -
Awesome.... you Just Dismantled the Dem Establishment's Excuse |
fascisthunter |
Jul-20-08 11:42 AM |
#45 |
| -
You call that a dismantling? |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-21-08 01:35 AM |
#79 |
| -
send this to the dems |
Enrique |
Jul-20-08 12:05 PM |
#46 |
| -
here's PDF to fax to them |
davidswanson |
Jul-20-08 01:00 PM |
#48 |
| -
Will fax first thing tomorrow |
proud2Blib |
Jul-20-08 01:50 PM |
#51 |
| -
I'm sure they could use the laugh. |
Richardo |
Jul-20-08 04:33 PM |
#59 |
| -
I'd like to give your post a K&R. |
progressoid |
Jul-20-08 09:54 PM |
#75 |
| -
Just sent my tenth pro-impeachment letter to Madam Speaker. |
Overseas |
Jul-20-08 01:54 PM |
#52 |
| -
K & R .... |
AzDar |
Jul-20-08 02:16 PM |
#53 |
| -
Impeachment reeks of divisive politics |
muryan |
Jul-20-08 03:38 PM |
#55 |
| -
Time for the Constitution to come to an end, too -- |
Beam Me Up |
Jul-20-08 06:19 PM |
#63 |
| -
This is not about partisanship. Have you read the articles of impeachment? |
beammeup |
Jul-20-08 07:24 PM |
#65 |
| -
You want President Cheney |
Richardo |
Jul-20-08 07:26 PM |
#66 |
| -
What "hyper-partisanship"? |
Fumesucker |
Jul-20-08 10:51 PM |
#76 |
| -
no - diebold decides |
mdmc |
Jul-20-08 07:27 PM |
#67 |
| -
I've been looking at this for almost a whole day now... |
Richardo |
Jul-20-08 07:36 PM |
#68 |
| -
that is some bad history. |
onenote |
Jul-20-08 08:08 PM |
#70 |
| -
Bush has the lowest approval rating |
WoodyM |
Jul-20-08 08:33 PM |
#73 |
| -
Well said WoodyM. Welcome to DU. nm |
rhett o rick |
Jul-21-08 11:04 PM |
#83 |
| -
K&R. |
Vidar |
Jul-20-08 09:22 PM |
#74 |
| -
I imagine if the Republicans wanted to gain back some respect, they should impeach Bush |
HughMoran |
Jul-20-08 11:17 PM |
#77 |
| -
Gore won the election, Bush stole it |
Hippo_Tron |
Jul-20-08 11:21 PM |
#78 |
| -
Oh come on. |
The Liberal Thinker |
Jul-21-08 07:52 AM |
#80 |
| -
Embarrassing, isn't it? |
Richardo |
Jul-21-08 09:40 AM |
#81 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread