Igel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-08-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
| 43. Think about it and your argument unravels. |
|
Or is that "ravels".
Gee. "Ravel" verbs are always a pain. Sort of like "cleave".
ravel –verb (used with object) 1. to disentangle or unravel the threads or fibers of (a woven or knitted fabric, rope, etc.). 2. to tangle or entangle. 3. to involve; confuse; perplex. 4. to make clear; unravel (often fol. by out).
cleave 1. to adhere closely; stick; cling (usually fol. by to). cleave 1. to split or divide by or as if by a cutting blow, esp. along a natural line of division, as the grain of wood.
There are a few words like that. Nobody said language is logical. In fact, it often isn't. Hence the frequent use of "double negatives" in so many languages, and even in so many dialects of English.
|
| -Pet Peeve: "irregardless" isn't a word! |
senseandsensibility |
Jul-08-08 04:48 PM |
#0 |
-
turn the asshole off....n/t |
Oceansaway |
Jul-08-08 04:49 PM |
#1 |
-
Regardless.... |
Aviation Pro |
Jul-08-08 04:49 PM |
#2 |
-
Boy, if that isn't an inflammable OP, I don't know what is! |
hedgehog |
Jul-08-08 04:49 PM |
#3 |
 -
Heh. good one. |
exothermic |
Jul-08-08 04:51 PM |
#5 |
-
Sure it is. Prescriptivists suck. |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-08-08 04:49 PM |
#4 |
 -
Here, as a bit of analogy: Have you ever said "up above?" Let's look at the etymology: |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-08-08 04:54 PM |
#9 |
 -
"Prescriptivists suck" |
fishwax |
Jul-09-08 10:35 AM |
#63 |
-
It's even worse than "comprised of." Gawd, the idiocy is limitless. |
Redstone |
Jul-08-08 04:51 PM |
#6 |
 -
Comprised of is improper? Please explain n/t |
Indenturedebtor |
Jul-08-08 04:54 PM |
#7 |
  -
The several comprise the whole. The whole is COMPOSED OF the several. |
Redstone |
Jul-08-08 04:57 PM |
#13 |
   -
Agreed. nt |
zanne |
Jul-09-08 07:05 AM |
#50 |
  -
Use "composed of." |
TahitiNut |
Jul-08-08 04:58 PM |
#15 |
   -
Or use "consists of." |
RebelOne |
Jul-09-08 06:06 AM |
#47 |
  -
irregardless of how it's used :) |
comtec |
Jul-09-08 03:15 AM |
#46 |
 -
You...you do accept the legitimacy of the passive tense in most terms, right? |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-08-08 04:56 PM |
#11 |
  -
Huh? |
Redstone |
Jul-08-08 04:57 PM |
#14 |
 -
If you can say, |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-08-08 05:01 PM |
#18 |
 -
No, the unit is COMPOSED of the twenty soldiers. And you're welcome to your opinion, |
Redstone |
Jul-08-08 05:04 PM |
#19 |
  -
...yes. That is one legitimate way of saying it. "Comprised" is another. There is no legitimate |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-08-08 05:08 PM |
#20 |
   -
And there's a tiring repetition of the word "prescriptivism." Anyone uses such a word |
Redstone |
Jul-08-08 05:23 PM |
#28 |
  -
Dear Redstone. You have just badly embarrassed yourself. |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-08-08 05:33 PM |
#30 |
  -
And yet the passive is a voice, not a tense. |
igil |
Jul-08-08 08:18 PM |
#40 |
  -
And now, a question about the use of "troops"... |
zanne |
Jul-09-08 07:08 AM |
#51 |
 -
From the grammar manual |
RebelOne |
Jul-09-08 06:11 AM |
#48 |
 -
Where did you get that book and who is the author? |
zanne |
Jul-09-08 07:09 AM |
#52 |
 -
Crap. I'm guilty of that. :( |
Political Heretic |
Jul-09-08 02:01 PM |
#81 |
-
For almost a decade,a Twit.. |
jeff30997 |
Jul-08-08 04:54 PM |
#8 |
 -
No. |
senseandsensibility |
Jul-08-08 05:00 PM |
#17 |
-
Ok then...I will type slooowly... |
jeff30997 |
Jul-08-08 05:08 PM |
#21 |
-
More importantly ... |
TahitiNut |
Jul-08-08 04:55 PM |
#10 |
-
Don't mean to be argumentative |
Popol Vuh |
Jul-08-08 04:56 PM |
#12 |
 -
And yet... |
jeff30997 |
Jul-08-08 05:10 PM |
#22 |
 -
That's not argmentative |
senseandsensibility |
Jul-08-08 05:10 PM |
#23 |
  -
GDP? |
jeff30997 |
Jul-08-08 05:13 PM |
#26 |
  -
It's a double negative. ARGGGHH! |
Perragrande |
Jul-08-08 06:45 PM |
#34 |
 -
Yeah, but it has the same meaning as "regardless". How silly is that? nt |
Ilsa |
Jul-08-08 05:28 PM |
#29 |
-
Think about it and your argument unravels. |
igil |
Jul-08-08 08:23 PM |
#43 |
-
It is silly.....but |
Popol Vuh |
Jul-09-08 05:55 PM |
#88 |
-
Well whoop-dee-shit. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jul-08-08 04:58 PM |
#16 |
-
thank you!! |
TexasObserver |
Jul-08-08 05:11 PM |
#24 |
-
It's a word. |
AchtungToddler |
Jul-08-08 05:12 PM |
#25 |
 -
It is a unit of language, comprised of morphemes, carrying meaning and possessing phonetical value. |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-08-08 05:15 PM |
#27 |
-
yes. I just didn't have those words ;) |
AchtungToddler |
Jul-08-08 06:00 PM |
#33 |
-
However, in places such as New Haven, where I live, you would be |
CTyankee |
Jul-08-08 07:49 PM |
#38 |
-
That's a social fact. |
igil |
Jul-08-08 08:26 PM |
#44 |
-
*shrug.* If you want to claim social dialect, sure. Nobody can argue with, |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-09-08 02:49 AM |
#45 |
-
OK, I'll check out what some of my Yalie friends have to say about such usage, |
CTyankee |
Jul-09-08 07:33 AM |
#55 |
-
Well, for one, you could tell them that you could use some help with reading. |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-09-08 09:55 AM |
#57 |
-
You are absolutely right. I had misread your post originally (I thought it sounded strange). |
CTyankee |
Jul-09-08 01:18 PM |
#76 |
-
That one's bugged me for along time. You know what else? I hate |
salguine |
Jul-08-08 05:38 PM |
#31 |
 -
I've been seeing more of that lately, too. |
senseandsensibility |
Jul-08-08 07:47 PM |
#37 |
 -
Damn you grammar nazi's! NT |
EOTE |
Jul-09-08 10:21 AM |
#61 |
 -
That one... |
MadrasT |
Jul-09-08 06:22 PM |
#90 |
-
I use it constantly! |
chemp |
Jul-08-08 05:52 PM |
#32 |
 -
Irritating people is always a good reason to do anything |
senseandsensibility |
Jul-08-08 07:45 PM |
#36 |
-
It's a great restaurant though...in Raleigh, NC! |
NC_Nurse |
Jul-08-08 07:40 PM |
#35 |
 -
Pictures please. n/t |
ColbertWatcher |
Jul-08-08 08:23 PM |
#42 |
-
Sorry, I don't have any... |
NC_Nurse |
Jul-09-08 07:04 AM |
#49 |
-
pics at site |
Lance_Boyle |
Jul-09-08 02:05 PM |
#82 |
-
Only elitists would use words correctably. n/t |
ColbertWatcher |
Jul-08-08 07:52 PM |
#39 |
-
I find it difficult to understand why one word uttered by a blockhead . . . |
papapi |
Jul-08-08 08:21 PM |
#41 |
-
It's a perfectly cromulent word |
Freddie Stubbs |
Jul-09-08 07:11 AM |
#53 |
-
then i guess that random house and webster's oughta take it out of their dictionaries... |
QuestionAll |
Jul-09-08 07:16 AM |
#54 |
-
How does anyone with such a username justify such an OP? |
sourmilk |
Jul-09-08 07:43 AM |
#56 |
-
Yeah. That bugs me alot. |
lumberjack_jeff |
Jul-09-08 09:59 AM |
#58 |
-
'Elements of Style' should be a textbook |
LanternWaste |
Jul-09-08 10:12 AM |
#59 |
 -
Wouldn't make a difference. |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-09-08 10:17 AM |
#60 |
  -
Would it please the court if I added a qualifier? |
LanternWaste |
Jul-09-08 10:27 AM |
#62 |
 -
Indeed |
Lifetimedem |
Jul-09-08 12:13 PM |
#73 |
 -
It was mandatory at SJSU. |
BushDespiser12 |
Jul-09-08 01:22 PM |
#77 |
-
um, of course it's a word |
fishwax |
Jul-09-08 10:48 AM |
#64 |
 -
You are a TEACHER? |
Lifetimedem |
Jul-09-08 10:58 AM |
#66 |
  -
yes, of English |
fishwax |
Jul-09-08 11:04 AM |
#69 |
 -
anything can be a "word" |
Lifetimedem |
Jul-09-08 12:07 PM |
#71 |
 -
yes, that's pretty much what I said |
fishwax |
Jul-09-08 01:06 PM |
#74 |
 -
Owned. |
Political Heretic |
Jul-09-08 02:06 PM |
#83 |
 -
Unraveling |
Lifetimedem |
Jul-09-08 08:34 PM |
#92 |
 -
yeah, I already said that about unraveling |
fishwax |
Jul-09-08 10:11 PM |
#94 |
 -
This is from a dictionary on my computer... |
devilgrrl |
Jul-09-08 01:17 PM |
#75 |
-
I didn't say the word was standard |
fishwax |
Jul-09-08 02:17 PM |
#86 |
-
Thank you |
Lifetimedem |
Jul-09-08 10:55 AM |
#65 |
-
So is "conversate" but I hear it 20 times a day and from my boss! NT |
Snarkturian Clone |
Jul-09-08 11:00 AM |
#67 |
 -
That is NOT a word. Please tell me that is not in the dictionary! nt |
ThruTheLookingGlass |
Jul-09-08 01:30 PM |
#78 |
-
It's AAVE |
Snarkturian Clone |
Jul-09-08 06:59 PM |
#91 |
-
"supposubly" he's a writer... |
michele77 |
Jul-09-08 11:00 AM |
#68 |
 -
I cringe at that one too |
fishwax |
Jul-09-08 11:07 AM |
#70 |
 -
How about this common error.. |
Lifetimedem |
Jul-09-08 12:10 PM |
#72 |
-
And there is no such thing as 'workahol', but we put the suffix -ic |
usnret88 |
Jul-09-08 01:57 PM |
#79 |
 -
LOL |
senseandsensibility |
Jul-09-08 01:59 PM |
#80 |
 -
I'm about to go get my workohol on :( |
Political Heretic |
Jul-09-08 02:07 PM |
#85 |
-
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!" |
Nevernose |
Jul-09-08 02:07 PM |
#84 |
 -
Sleep, that's where I'm a viking! |
michele77 |
Jul-09-08 02:20 PM |
#87 |
-
Well Your Pet Peeve Is Dumb... Wrong Too... |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jul-09-08 06:15 PM |
#89 |
-
Pet Peeve: uptight bores! (n/t) |
batwing |
Jul-09-08 08:40 PM |
#93 |