You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #59: No, because I wasn't using sarcasm. Read what I said. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Psyop Samurai Donating Member (873 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. No, because I wasn't using sarcasm. Read what I said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -The only way for impeachment to happen is to convince Pelosi it's politically beneficial sfexpat2000  Jun-11-08 05:18 PM   #0 
  - You're right  MonkeyFunk   Jun-11-08 05:19 PM   #1 
  - Here's my contribution: We need to make sure that Bush  JDPriestly   Jun-11-08 06:37 PM   #40 
     - Can you imagine how he would strut  loyalsister   Jun-11-08 06:46 PM   #41 
     - Personally, I think revenge is a dish best served cold.  ConservativeDemocrat   Jun-11-08 06:50 PM   #42 
  - BINGO! I tell people it's about not about people, it's about...  ClassWarrior   Jun-11-08 05:20 PM   #2 
  - Nancy won't go there for the Constitution. She might go there  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 05:24 PM   #7 
     - Yeah, but that might turn enough of her voters to make her take notice.  ClassWarrior   Jun-11-08 05:48 PM   #30 
  - AND to grant her immunity  leftofthedial   Jun-11-08 05:21 PM   #3 
  - LOL we have a winner! Considering that DLC was SO SURE that Clinton would get nom.,  crikkett   Jun-11-08 05:22 PM   #5 
  - Hmmm.  darkmaestro019   Jun-11-08 05:21 PM   #4 
  - The Republican base is trotting away from McMore.  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 05:23 PM   #6 
  - If the pukes were smart, they'd push for Impeachment.  tekisui   Jun-11-08 05:27 PM   #10 
     - DING! You get to choose anything on the top shelf.  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 05:28 PM   #11 
        - I think the only thing that would work  MissWaverly   Jun-11-08 05:45 PM   #26 
           - If the Republicans could be given an opportunity to run away from Bush  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 05:56 PM   #34 
              - well, yeah, remember they had an easy bump after Watergate  MissWaverly   Jun-11-08 06:01 PM   #35 
                 - Carter was four years, btw /nt  jberryhill   Jun-11-08 07:04 PM   #46 
                    - Yes, we know that. But, thanks. n/t  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 08:31 PM   #53 
                    - yes, that's right, Iran hostages ended his presidency  MissWaverly   Jun-12-08 04:14 PM   #64 
  - Except McCain didn't say that  jberryhill   Jun-11-08 07:02 PM   #45 
  - IF Impeachment Hearings were held, the War Crimes Administration  tekisui   Jun-11-08 05:24 PM   #8 
  - So, the political argument would be, the people get to hear  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 05:27 PM   #9 
  - Not just failures, but CRIMES!  tekisui   Jun-11-08 05:29 PM   #12 
     - Yeah exactly! So why do we have to put up with all this bullshit talk around. Just get to it!  lonestarnot   Jun-11-08 05:34 PM   #14 
     - Me, too. But we don't have the political power to just get to it right now.  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 05:37 PM   #17 
        - Isn't this just insane? WTF do they need to be shown?  lonestarnot   Jun-11-08 05:41 PM   #21 
           - They need to be shown how they can do this without losing in November.  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 05:54 PM   #32 
           - all they think about is their own jobs  MissWaverly   Jun-11-08 06:08 PM   #37 
     - What is the political difference between a failure and a crime?  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 05:34 PM   #15 
        - Many of chimpy's crimes were political.  tekisui   Jun-11-08 05:38 PM   #18 
           - But I'm asking for political arguments that might sway Pelosi.  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 05:42 PM   #22 
              - Power from the Criminals. Power to the People. Only the Democrats  tekisui   Jun-11-08 05:44 PM   #25 
                 - Works for me.  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 05:47 PM   #28 
  - Yep I am very convinced in what you are saying.  truedelphi   Jun-12-08 03:26 AM   #61 
  - Great Civics lesson, Obama should be on board.  mirrera   Jun-11-08 05:34 PM   #13 
  - If we want this to happen, I don't think we can fuck politics.  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 05:35 PM   #16 
     - Our government has had such contempt for the law, and such devotion  tekisui   Jun-11-08 05:40 PM   #20 
     - I see no downside to rehearsing in public how bad Bush has been for us.  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 05:46 PM   #27 
        - None at all.  tekisui   Jun-11-08 05:47 PM   #29 
     - Law HAS to come first. It should be a no brainer...  mirrera   Jun-11-08 05:52 PM   #31 
        - But here and now, law doesn't come first. We're not there  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 05:55 PM   #33 
  - Nancy Pelosi must recuse herself due to conflict of interest regarding the "Gang of Eight"  Swamp Rat   Jun-11-08 05:39 PM   #19 
  - Yep--great post at Kos about this  librechik   Jun-11-08 05:42 PM   #23 
  - But you know and I know, that won't happen.  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 05:43 PM   #24 
  - You are right.  mirrera   Jun-11-08 06:01 PM   #36 
  - It's your vote...  slipslidingaway   Jun-11-08 06:11 PM   #38 
  - No. My vote doesn't have the same power as the party leadership  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 06:32 PM   #39 
     - Agree one vote here or there may not amount to much...  slipslidingaway   Jun-12-08 03:58 PM   #63 
  - You need two thirds of senators willing to vote for it. That's why it won't happen n/t  cynatnite   Jun-11-08 06:51 PM   #43 
  - Wrong. Conyers needs the green light fron Nancy.  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 08:28 PM   #51 
  - The Carter Effect?  jberryhill   Jun-11-08 07:00 PM   #44 
  - You do know the antecedents of the Iran hostage "crisis" right?  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 08:30 PM   #52 
     - Yes...  jberryhill   Jun-11-08 08:50 PM   #60 
  - You live in CA...what do her constituents think of her....?  KoKo01   Jun-11-08 07:23 PM   #47 
  - It was such a surprise to me that she won her primary by 84%  Ms. November   Jun-11-08 07:43 PM   #48 
  - Major burn out all over the district and no money. n/t  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 08:33 PM   #56 
  - Well...maybe it's the "incumbant is good because we know them" issue or her  KoKo01   Jun-11-08 08:01 PM   #50 
  - What if she is guilty too?  BlueJac   Jun-11-08 07:53 PM   #49 
  - That's not the question here.  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 08:32 PM   #54 
  - Ruling out morality and law is a good place to start...  Psyop Samurai   Jun-11-08 08:33 PM   #55 
  - Did you forget the sarcasm tag?  sfexpat2000   Jun-11-08 08:34 PM   #57 
     - No, because I wasn't using sarcasm. Read what I said.  Psyop Samurai   Jun-11-08 08:37 PM   #59 
  - The problem is that this is a hypothetical. It's hard to "prove" that it is politically beneficial!  calipendence   Jun-11-08 08:35 PM   #58 
  - Once the facts are presented, the people will overwhelmingly get behind impeachment.  8_year_nightmare   Jun-12-08 02:21 PM   #62 
  - How about it's an election year and she has Cindy Sheehan and Shirley Golub  Cleita   Jun-12-08 04:21 PM   #65 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC