You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #50: Childbirth costs were usually covered under insurance . . . after a long battle with [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
50. Childbirth costs were usually covered under insurance . . . after a long battle with
insurance companies. And . . . is pregnancy "voluntary" in a society where most people have children and are pretty much expected to have them?

We need to open up that discussion . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Will abortion funding sink health care reform? rurallib  Jun-08-08 09:14 PM   #0 
  - It might depend on whether or not people on our side are all-or-nothing types.  BlooInBloo   Jun-08-08 09:16 PM   #1 
  - Well, I sure hope the people on our side are willing  JerseygirlCT   Jun-08-08 09:19 PM   #2 
  - She can make any decision she wants.  Yael   Jun-08-08 09:21 PM   #6 
  - You really think ending aan unwanted pregnancy is comparable  JerseygirlCT   Jun-08-08 09:28 PM   #16 
  - I believe that abortions are voluntary procedures with the decisions  Yael   Jun-08-08 09:33 PM   #18 
     - I should hope ALL procedures would be voluntary under UHC  Crowdance   Jun-08-08 10:07 PM   #32 
     - Voluntary vs Medical Necessary  Yael   Jun-08-08 10:10 PM   #37 
        - You don't understand that abortions are "medically necessary" in many cases???  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:14 PM   #40 
        - Yes. Medically necessary is a more meaningful term  Crowdance   Jun-08-08 10:14 PM   #41 
     - Unfortunately, there's a problem with your reasoning...  colinmom71   Jun-08-08 11:02 PM   #64 
        - Yes, well said.  JerseygirlCT   Jun-09-08 06:52 AM   #68 
           - Yeah, without proper knowledge, the terminology can get slippery....  colinmom71   Jun-09-08 07:26 AM   #69 
              - Completely agreed  JerseygirlCT   Jun-09-08 02:09 PM   #82 
  - You're comparing a woman's need for an abortion to "botox injections" . . .???  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:13 PM   #39 
  - hmm, some botox is covered for spastic paraplegia, I should know & it's a terrible procedure into  NotThisTime   Jun-09-08 04:24 PM   #87 
  - I think we should stand strong on that and turn Republicans who are not "Pro-Life"  patrice   Jun-08-08 09:47 PM   #24 
     - Who in the hell is "pro-life" . . . ??? Catholic women have abortions at the same rate as . ..  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:17 PM   #42 
        - Don't know for sure. I see occassional LTTEs about  patrice   Jun-08-08 10:33 PM   #48 
           - The corporate-press isn't covering the other side of this and progress  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:45 PM   #58 
              - Re churches & military - for Many = Security, emotional and economic, ergo no need to adapt. nt  patrice   Jun-09-08 08:09 AM   #72 
                 - Not challenging the system has its comforts ---  defendandprotect   Jun-09-08 09:12 AM   #75 
  - Not sure if I quite follow  rurallib   Jun-08-08 09:20 PM   #4 
     - No one is saying that we need to go back to back alley coat hangers  Yael   Jun-08-08 09:22 PM   #9 
     - What you'll have to deal with then, is the consequences of women  Lars39   Jun-09-08 08:08 AM   #71 
     - I think that common sense will dictate that if we are caring of women, we are going  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:21 PM   #44 
  - I would say, yes as it is voluntary  Yael   Jun-08-08 09:19 PM   #3 
  - I don't think optional procedures should ever be included  prolifedemq   Jun-08-08 09:21 PM   #7 
  - How do we differentiate between voluntary and necessary abortion? Is it simply"health of the mother"  patrice   Jun-08-08 09:54 PM   #26 
  - Either. "Voluntary abortion" is neither.  Yael   Jun-08-08 10:12 PM   #38 
  - I tend to agree with you, but I'm wondering whether that affects my approach :  patrice   Jun-08-08 10:19 PM   #43 
  - The female has the ESTABLISHED life so it's her judgment ... per Roe vs Wade ---  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:49 PM   #59 
  - Not going to answer you because you are Ts'd. tata.  uppityperson   Jun-09-08 03:03 PM   #84 
  - My concern is that is the only cudgel I can see that the GOP has  rurallib   Jun-08-08 09:22 PM   #8 
  - It isn't compromise -- it is stages  Yael   Jun-08-08 09:25 PM   #13 
  - Got news for you, "personal desires" equals self-determination.  Lars39   Jun-09-08 08:11 AM   #73 
  - They will have other FEAR issues . . believe me --- !!!  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:51 PM   #60 
  - Voluntary and  elleng   Jun-08-08 09:23 PM   #11 
  - Bingo.  Yael   Jun-08-08 09:27 PM   #14 
  - THESE . . . are the very discussions that have to take place in society . . .  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:55 PM   #63 
  - I think you need to shut up and then go fuck yourself...  Scout   Jun-09-08 11:33 AM   #79 
  - THIS is one of the big areas where they don't want FREEDOM to enter the  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:53 PM   #61 
  - THIS is one of the big areas where they don't want FREEDOM to enter the  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:54 PM   #62 
  - To suggest that when pregnancies go wrong it is "voluntary" . ..  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:27 PM   #46 
  - The argument needs to be reframed....and most importantly  MadMaddie   Jun-08-08 09:20 PM   #5 
  - I agree, but this will be their main weapon  rurallib   Jun-08-08 09:23 PM   #10 
  - And they will win and *shock amongst shock* I agree with them  Yael   Jun-08-08 09:30 PM   #17 
  - They are bullies and will keep after it if they don't get strong enough replies . . .  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:33 PM   #49 
  - EXACTLY: Any discussion that includes the words "Pro-Life" MUST include what Women need in order to  patrice   Jun-08-08 10:07 PM   #33 
  - I agree --- the GOP really shut up Democrats on this issue ---  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:31 PM   #47 
  - oh please  Aragorn   Jun-08-08 09:25 PM   #12 
  - Silly me - I assumed most everything would be covered.  rurallib   Jun-08-08 09:27 PM   #15 
  - Pregnancy is SOMEWHAT voluntary,  elleng   Jun-08-08 09:34 PM   #19 
  - You would take away a woman's right to reproduce?  Perragrande   Jun-08-08 09:40 PM   #21 
     - Why would you suggest that I  elleng   Jun-08-08 09:46 PM   #23 
     - They are mixing their metaphors.  Yael   Jun-08-08 10:02 PM   #29 
     - I would think that males would also have an interest in seeing childbirth covered . . .  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:36 PM   #51 
  - Childbirth costs were usually covered under insurance . . . after a long battle with  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:35 PM   #50 
  - So the health care that is likely to help make abortions fewer is going to be held hostage to  patrice   Jun-08-08 09:40 PM   #20 
  - It would go a long way, Patrice...  Yael   Jun-08-08 10:03 PM   #30 
  - I think the whole "pro-life" BS is pretty much like the "Silent Majority" BS . . .  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:39 PM   #53 
     - We agree. So we need to expose that fact publicly. Get Republicans to own up to it too.  patrice   Jun-09-08 08:07 AM   #70 
        - There still seems to be tons of GOP propaganda around, though  defendandprotect   Jun-09-08 09:27 AM   #76 
           - Yes, murder of more than simply abortion providers. It was "Pro-Lifers" who put Bush over the line  patrice   Jun-09-08 12:33 PM   #80 
  - Let's be optimistic....  noel711   Jun-08-08 09:45 PM   #22 
  - We can envision it, but...  ColbertWatcher   Jun-08-08 09:55 PM   #27 
     - But the 'sheep' won't be voting in congress...  noel711   Jun-08-08 10:26 PM   #45 
     - "She got real quiet"  ColbertWatcher   Jun-08-08 10:37 PM   #52 
     - We also have to understand that we're not dealing with normal people . . .  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:41 PM   #54 
        - I hope they don't regroup. n/t  ColbertWatcher   Jun-08-08 10:43 PM   #57 
  - This is very important, why no recs people? n/t  ColbertWatcher   Jun-08-08 09:53 PM   #25 
  - rec  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:41 PM   #55 
  - I'm waiting for the first person to ask about sex-change operations.  Carnea   Jun-08-08 10:00 PM   #28 
  - Another good example of voluntary  Yael   Jun-08-08 10:05 PM   #31 
  - Well, Cuba is offering to do them for us . .. didn't you hear?  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:42 PM   #56 
  - It depends on how idiotic Americans swallowing the MSM can be! NT  burrowowl   Jun-08-08 10:09 PM   #34 
  - Hyde amendment  thecatburgler   Jun-08-08 10:10 PM   #35 
  - Wasn't that the work of good ole Henry Hyde to keep abortion from becoming  defendandprotect   Jun-08-08 10:10 PM   #36 
  - The Hyde Amendment.  Perragrande   Jun-09-08 01:25 AM   #66 
     - eh . . .  defendandprotect   Jun-09-08 09:44 AM   #77 
  - It wouldn't be universal healthcare if anything is excluded  lastliberalintexas   Jun-08-08 11:11 PM   #65 
  - Simple. Add it to the first drafts, then remove it after complaints.  anonymous171   Jun-09-08 02:47 AM   #67 
  - we already have government-funded abortions  tuggle   Jun-09-08 08:12 AM   #74 
  - One thing to think about: if we offer UHC, then the need for an abortion for reasons  ithinkmyliverhurts   Jun-09-08 10:00 AM   #78 
  - Options, options, options, that is what women need, including iron-clad adoption agreements.  patrice   Jun-09-08 12:37 PM   #81 
  - That is a sticky wicket but the way to fight it is to  Cleita   Jun-09-08 02:13 PM   #83 
     - No, generally it's not...  colinmom71   Jun-09-08 04:20 PM   #85 
        - That's too bad. I don't have a solution right now either.n/t  Cleita   Jun-09-08 04:23 PM   #86 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC