You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #10: ...dependent? [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

Kelly Rupert

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Mar-04-07 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #8

10. ...dependent?

Dependent on what? Drugs? Alcohol? Love? Teddy bears?

I'll admit that usually when browsing forums, I am generally dependent on the ability of OPs to post meaningful topics for discussion. Generally, I assume that if an OP has a point, he will have made it in the OP. I do not assume that the content of the OP is actually a clever ruse designed to distract me from the link-hopping treasure hunt that has been laid out for me. And I usually do not assume that the OP will respond to requests for clarification by lashing out at "lazy flamers." So I suppose in those ways, I am lazily dependent, yes, and I apologize for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

-ABC News said atheists/agnostics are only 2% of population	UTUSN	Mar-04-07 09:25 PM	#0
- The headline doesn't seem to have a whole lot in common with the post. n/t	Kelly Rupert	Mar-04-07 09:29 PM	#1
- ...and the thread title was an eye catcher! ... eom	TheBorealAvenger	Mar-04-07 09:30 PM	#2
- pls provide citation for absurd claim by ABC	JackRiddler	Mar-04-07 09:36 PM	#3
- Geez (how ironic) : Why is my thread being flamed? I said what ABC said	UTUSN	Mar-04-07 09:39 PM	#4
- Your snips also do not reference the number of atheists in America.	Kelly Rupert	Mar-04-07 09:40 PM	#6
- Deleted message	Name removed	Mar-04-07 09:45 PM	#8
- ...dependent?	Kelly Rupert	Mar-04-07 09:51 PM	#10
- Deleted message	Name removed	Mar-04-07 09:57 PM	#14
- Thanks for the analysis.	Kelly Rupert	Mar-04-07 10:03 PM	#17
- but if you are going to have that headline your post should have something to do with it.	WI_DEM	Mar-05-07 09:11 AM	#23
- pls provide citation for claim by JackRiddler.	Kelly Rupert	Mar-04-07 09:39 PM	#5
- Me.	JackRiddler	Mar-05-07 09:02 AM	#20
- prior thread	JackRiddler	Mar-05-07 09:05 AM	#21
- MSM seems to get little correct - atheist have been a steady 4% for 75 years of	papau	Mar-04-07 09:42 PM	#7
- I heard that too and thought WTF	magellan	Mar-04-07 09:50 PM	#9
- Deleted message	Name removed	Mar-04-07 09:51 PM	#12
- Most sites seem to reference US census figures	tkmorris	Mar-04-07 09:51 PM	#11
- The "no religion" types are problematic.	Kelly Rupert	Mar-04-07 09:57 PM	#15
- when asked my religion	pop goes the weasel	Mar-05-07 12:00 AM	#18
- Well, they didn't ask me.	Jamastiene	Mar-04-07 09:53 PM	#13
- This is a good break out on religions in the US.	btmlndfrmr	Mar-04-07 09:58 PM	#16
- Agnosticism is a cop out	cgrindley	Mar-05-07 09:08 AM	#22
- yet some religious keep claiming they are being persecuted	JI7	Mar-05-07 12:03 AM	#19
- So it's okay to ignore and belittle the beliefs of 6,000,000 Americans?	Atman	Mar-05-07 09:11 AM	#24

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.