It's just a bunch of papers bound together, just like a bible or a talmud or a sutra. Just because various superstitious people call a stack of papers "holy" doesn't make it so.
I wonder how long supposedly objective journalists will continue to humor the superstitious by referring to their various talismans and texts as "holy" without at least quotation marks or saying "the book held to be holy by followers of Islam".
It's not holy to me - there is no such thing as a holy book.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
