Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 19. So you assisted the worst evil imaginable. |
| -This Democrat is voting for Ralph Nader |
Jackpine Radical |
Feb-26-08 03:59 PM |
#0 |
-
okay.....you got me |
Tarheel_Dem |
Feb-26-08 04:01 PM |
#1 |
-
D'oh! |
crispini |
Feb-26-08 04:01 PM |
#2 |
-
And there's something wrong with his eye too! |
Touchdown |
Feb-26-08 04:03 PM |
#3 |
-
there would be no 'war' on terror, no illegal invasion of Iraq, and the WTC would still exists |
ixion |
Feb-26-08 04:03 PM |
#4 |
 -
But, but, but, there's no difference between Gore and Bush. |
Touchdown |
Feb-26-08 04:07 PM |
#5 |
-
Rickroll! |
yardwork |
Feb-26-08 04:08 PM |
#6 |
-
There's totally no difference between Al Gore and GWB! |
GOPBasher |
Feb-26-08 04:09 PM |
#7 |
-
No. Nader is not responsible but is a convenient fall guy. |
genie_weenie |
Feb-26-08 04:10 PM |
#8 |
 -
He could be relevant if he'd ramp up the drive for a third party, but instead, |
blondeatlast |
Feb-26-08 04:20 PM |
#10 |
  -
I agree. |
FitzmasAgain |
Feb-26-08 04:36 PM |
#13 |
 -
Wow... |
tanglefoot |
Feb-26-08 04:30 PM |
#12 |
  -
I know, man, the truth boggles the mind! |
genie_weenie |
Feb-26-08 04:58 PM |
#25 |
 -
Yup. A fall guy for the Democratic Party's failure to earn the votes of the left. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Feb-26-08 04:40 PM |
#15 |
  -
So you assisted the worst evil imaginable. |
Virginia Dare |
Feb-26-08 04:47 PM |
#19 |
   -
How do you mean? |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Feb-26-08 04:48 PM |
#20 |
  -
On balance, did votes for Nader in 2000 produce a positive outcome, or a negative outcome? |
Raskolnik |
Feb-26-08 04:52 PM |
#22 |
   -
Neither. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Feb-26-08 04:56 PM |
#23 |
  -
No, but they are responsible for how *they* voted |
Raskolnik |
Feb-26-08 05:06 PM |
#31 |
  -
The votes were available to Gore but he shunned the left. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Feb-26-08 05:09 PM |
#35 |
  -
So who did those votes punish? Gore, or the entire country? |
Raskolnik |
Feb-26-08 05:11 PM |
#38 |
  -
Wrong! The mere fact of the D, forces you to vote for them, anything less |
genie_weenie |
Feb-26-08 05:12 PM |
#39 |
  -
Or just a distraction from the fact that we WON those votes, but ? |
dicksteele |
Feb-26-08 04:58 PM |
#24 |
  -
True. And it's not as if my vote for Nader in 2000 for which I should be publicly flogged |
genie_weenie |
Feb-26-08 05:00 PM |
#26 |
   -
I held my nose and voted for Gore. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Feb-26-08 05:01 PM |
#29 |
  -
I'm voting Obama and hoping |
genie_weenie |
Feb-26-08 05:06 PM |
#32 |
  -
So you don't consider the difference between Obama and McCain to be significant enough |
Raskolnik |
Feb-26-08 05:07 PM |
#34 |
  -
I am taking a side. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Feb-26-08 05:11 PM |
#37 |
  -
So you're taking McCain's side, in effect. |
Raskolnik |
Feb-26-08 05:15 PM |
#40 |
  -
So you disagree with the sentiments expressed in the quotes? |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Feb-26-08 05:21 PM |
#42 |
   -
I base my vote on what I perceive to be in the best interests of the country. |
Raskolnik |
Feb-26-08 05:25 PM |
#44 |
  -
What kind of election do you want? |
genie_weenie |
Feb-26-08 05:23 PM |
#43 |
  -
Yes, I want Saddam on the ballot, and Saddam only. That's exactly what I want. |
Raskolnik |
Feb-26-08 05:27 PM |
#45 |
  -
You're the one claiming a vote for anyone other than the PARTY APPOINTEE is |
genie_weenie |
Feb-26-08 05:30 PM |
#47 |
  -
It absolutely is. That's exactly why I want some douche-bag like Alan Keyes to run on a third-party |
Raskolnik |
Feb-26-08 05:37 PM |
#49 |
  -
Another one given up on the lesser of two weavils. |
bobbolink |
Feb-26-08 07:33 PM |
#59 |
 -
If that's the case |
eissa |
Feb-26-08 04:41 PM |
#16 |
 -
Who knows what would have happened.. |
Virginia Dare |
Feb-26-08 04:45 PM |
#18 |
  -
Maybe Harry Turtledove could write one of those |
genie_weenie |
Feb-26-08 05:04 PM |
#30 |
 -
Of course it was a stupid self-aggrandizing thing for him to run in 2000 |
Virginia Dare |
Feb-26-08 05:06 PM |
#33 |
 -
I think that kind of outlook is too clever by half |
Raskolnik |
Feb-26-08 04:51 PM |
#21 |
-
Yeah, right. Like the never were anti-war congress |
genie_weenie |
Feb-26-08 05:10 PM |
#36 |
-
Do you want a laundry list of ways in which a Gore presidency would have differed from a Bush |
Raskolnik |
Feb-26-08 05:18 PM |
#41 |
-
Everything you post is mental masturbation |
genie_weenie |
Feb-26-08 05:28 PM |
#46 |
-
How does voting for Nader accomplish anything? |
Raskolnik |
Feb-26-08 05:34 PM |
#48 |
-
Because the Two Party system is fundamentally opposed to allowing in |
genie_weenie |
Feb-26-08 05:39 PM |
#50 |
-
Then Nader voters should build a third party, and not stamp their feet every four years |
Raskolnik |
Feb-26-08 05:44 PM |
#52 |
-
why, i oughta..... |
spanone |
Feb-26-08 04:12 PM |
#9 |
-
Wish the man would just retire. He's an embarassment. |
applegrove |
Feb-26-08 04:27 PM |
#11 |
-
Dayum, I was ready to let loose on you, it's a good thing I read the |
TommyO |
Feb-26-08 04:37 PM |
#14 |
-
Don't forget 8 years of further unrestrained.. |
Virginia Dare |
Feb-26-08 04:44 PM |
#17 |
-
ROFLMAO. You want us to believe you are a card-carrying DEM? |
L. Coyote |
Feb-26-08 05:01 PM |
#27 |
-
gee, and I thought it was because a lot of people voted for Bush |
provis99 |
Feb-26-08 05:01 PM |
#28 |
-
I will never forgive him for causing Al Gore, my hero, to lose even one vote. |
MasonJar |
Feb-26-08 05:41 PM |
#51 |
 -
How many votes? |
stark6935 |
Feb-26-08 05:52 PM |
#54 |
-
In fairness..... |
IowaGirl |
Feb-26-08 05:52 PM |
#53 |
 -
Sure. But they wouldn't have had the opportunity |
Jackpine Radical |
Feb-26-08 07:33 PM |
#58 |
-
Made me click |
libodem |
Feb-26-08 06:10 PM |
#55 |
-
how many election losses are dems going to blame on nader before they start looking in the mirror? |
VotesForWomen |
Feb-26-08 07:24 PM |
#56 |
-
A third party, 4th, and 5th even - just might save the USA as a respectable country. |
ConcernedCanuk |
Feb-26-08 07:26 PM |
#57 |