You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: But, but, but, there's no difference between Gore and Bush. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But, but, but, there's no difference between Gore and Bush.
St. Ralph said so! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -This Democrat is voting for Ralph Nader Jackpine Radical  Feb-26-08 03:59 PM   #0 
  - okay.....you got me  Tarheel_Dem   Feb-26-08 04:01 PM   #1 
  - D'oh!  crispini   Feb-26-08 04:01 PM   #2 
  - And there's something wrong with his eye too!  Touchdown   Feb-26-08 04:03 PM   #3 
  - there would be no 'war' on terror, no illegal invasion of Iraq, and the WTC would still exists  ixion   Feb-26-08 04:03 PM   #4 
  - But, but, but, there's no difference between Gore and Bush.  Touchdown   Feb-26-08 04:07 PM   #5 
  - Rickroll!  yardwork   Feb-26-08 04:08 PM   #6 
  - There's totally no difference between Al Gore and GWB!  GOPBasher   Feb-26-08 04:09 PM   #7 
  - No. Nader is not responsible but is a convenient fall guy.  genie_weenie   Feb-26-08 04:10 PM   #8 
  - He could be relevant if he'd ramp up the drive for a third party, but instead,  blondeatlast   Feb-26-08 04:20 PM   #10 
  - I agree.  FitzmasAgain   Feb-26-08 04:36 PM   #13 
  - Wow...  tanglefoot   Feb-26-08 04:30 PM   #12 
  - I know, man, the truth boggles the mind!  genie_weenie   Feb-26-08 04:58 PM   #25 
  - Yup. A fall guy for the Democratic Party's failure to earn the votes of the left.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Feb-26-08 04:40 PM   #15 
  - So you assisted the worst evil imaginable.  Virginia Dare   Feb-26-08 04:47 PM   #19 
  - How do you mean?  Tierra_y_Libertad   Feb-26-08 04:48 PM   #20 
  - On balance, did votes for Nader in 2000 produce a positive outcome, or a negative outcome?  Raskolnik   Feb-26-08 04:52 PM   #22 
  - Neither.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Feb-26-08 04:56 PM   #23 
     - No, but they are responsible for how *they* voted  Raskolnik   Feb-26-08 05:06 PM   #31 
        - The votes were available to Gore but he shunned the left.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Feb-26-08 05:09 PM   #35 
           - So who did those votes punish? Gore, or the entire country?  Raskolnik   Feb-26-08 05:11 PM   #38 
           - Wrong! The mere fact of the D, forces you to vote for them, anything less  genie_weenie   Feb-26-08 05:12 PM   #39 
  - Or just a distraction from the fact that we WON those votes, but ?  dicksteele   Feb-26-08 04:58 PM   #24 
  - True. And it's not as if my vote for Nader in 2000 for which I should be publicly flogged  genie_weenie   Feb-26-08 05:00 PM   #26 
  - I held my nose and voted for Gore.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Feb-26-08 05:01 PM   #29 
     - I'm voting Obama and hoping  genie_weenie   Feb-26-08 05:06 PM   #32 
     - So you don't consider the difference between Obama and McCain to be significant enough  Raskolnik   Feb-26-08 05:07 PM   #34 
        - I am taking a side.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Feb-26-08 05:11 PM   #37 
           - So you're taking McCain's side, in effect.  Raskolnik   Feb-26-08 05:15 PM   #40 
              - So you disagree with the sentiments expressed in the quotes?  Tierra_y_Libertad   Feb-26-08 05:21 PM   #42 
              - I base my vote on what I perceive to be in the best interests of the country.  Raskolnik   Feb-26-08 05:25 PM   #44 
              - What kind of election do you want?  genie_weenie   Feb-26-08 05:23 PM   #43 
                 - Yes, I want Saddam on the ballot, and Saddam only. That's exactly what I want.  Raskolnik   Feb-26-08 05:27 PM   #45 
                    - You're the one claiming a vote for anyone other than the PARTY APPOINTEE is  genie_weenie   Feb-26-08 05:30 PM   #47 
                       - It absolutely is. That's exactly why I want some douche-bag like Alan Keyes to run on a third-party  Raskolnik   Feb-26-08 05:37 PM   #49 
  - Another one given up on the lesser of two weavils.  bobbolink   Feb-26-08 07:33 PM   #59 
  - If that's the case  eissa   Feb-26-08 04:41 PM   #16 
  - Who knows what would have happened..  Virginia Dare   Feb-26-08 04:45 PM   #18 
  - Maybe Harry Turtledove could write one of those  genie_weenie   Feb-26-08 05:04 PM   #30 
     - Of course it was a stupid self-aggrandizing thing for him to run in 2000  Virginia Dare   Feb-26-08 05:06 PM   #33 
  - I think that kind of outlook is too clever by half  Raskolnik   Feb-26-08 04:51 PM   #21 
     - Yeah, right. Like the never were anti-war congress  genie_weenie   Feb-26-08 05:10 PM   #36 
        - Do you want a laundry list of ways in which a Gore presidency would have differed from a Bush  Raskolnik   Feb-26-08 05:18 PM   #41 
           - Everything you post is mental masturbation  genie_weenie   Feb-26-08 05:28 PM   #46 
              - How does voting for Nader accomplish anything?  Raskolnik   Feb-26-08 05:34 PM   #48 
                 - Because the Two Party system is fundamentally opposed to allowing in  genie_weenie   Feb-26-08 05:39 PM   #50 
                    - Then Nader voters should build a third party, and not stamp their feet every four years  Raskolnik   Feb-26-08 05:44 PM   #52 
  - why, i oughta.....  spanone   Feb-26-08 04:12 PM   #9 
  - Wish the man would just retire. He's an embarassment.  applegrove   Feb-26-08 04:27 PM   #11 
  - Dayum, I was ready to let loose on you, it's a good thing I read the  TommyO   Feb-26-08 04:37 PM   #14 
  - Don't forget 8 years of further unrestrained..  Virginia Dare   Feb-26-08 04:44 PM   #17 
  - ROFLMAO. You want us to believe you are a card-carrying DEM?  L. Coyote   Feb-26-08 05:01 PM   #27 
  - gee, and I thought it was because a lot of people voted for Bush  provis99   Feb-26-08 05:01 PM   #28 
  - I will never forgive him for causing Al Gore, my hero, to lose even one vote.  MasonJar   Feb-26-08 05:41 PM   #51 
  - How many votes?  stark6935   Feb-26-08 05:52 PM   #54 
  - In fairness.....  IowaGirl   Feb-26-08 05:52 PM   #53 
  - Sure. But they wouldn't have had the opportunity  Jackpine Radical   Feb-26-08 07:33 PM   #58 
  - Made me click  libodem   Feb-26-08 06:10 PM   #55 
  - how many election losses are dems going to blame on nader before they start looking in the mirror?  VotesForWomen   Feb-26-08 07:24 PM   #56 
  - A third party, 4th, and 5th even - just might save the USA as a respectable country.  ConcernedCanuk   Feb-26-08 07:26 PM   #57 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC