EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-01-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
| 33. I wonder how many votes Nader would have gotten |
|
had the Democrats run a liberal campaign.
But, no. You have to diss him for running?
That's a fine little democracy you have going there.
Tie yourself into knots if you choose. The fact is, Nader would have no supporters if the Democrats stopped catering to the right wing of the party.
|
| -When Nader admited he accepted money from the GOP, were you happy or upset? |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 12:02 PM |
#0 |
-
Neither. I felt justified in my dislike of him |
LisaM |
Feb-01-08 12:05 PM |
#1 |
-
Nadar could give me all his money and get caught fellating George W. Bush |
DS1 |
Feb-01-08 12:05 PM |
#2 |
-
Furious. Unforgiveable. Phony. I also remember some acknowledgements |
higher class |
Feb-01-08 12:07 PM |
#3 |
 -
I agree. Nader's a fake through and through. Scary that he was the Green candidate! nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 12:08 PM |
# |
-
i said , what a jackass |
iamthebandfanman |
Feb-01-08 12:08 PM |
#4 |
 -
He was a HUGE reason why we've had 8 years of Bush. |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 12:10 PM |
#5 |
-
i agree with you 100% |
focusfan |
Feb-01-08 12:36 PM |
#13 |
-
The Supreme Court also contributed to his campaign! n/t |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 02:39 PM |
#31 |
-
Nader and the SC. The SC was right wing. Nader claims not to be. |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 02:51 PM |
#39 |
-
We all need our beliefs to offset reality. n/t |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 02:54 PM |
#43 |
-
Have a look in the mirror |
depakid |
Feb-01-08 03:00 PM |
#50 |
-
Nader claims not be Republican. Or at least he used to. No telling now. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 03:03 PM |
#57 |
-
Another ridiculous claim. |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 03:18 PM |
#64 |
-
I couldn't have cared less. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Feb-01-08 12:11 PM |
#6 |
 -
You shouldn't have cared less because of the rampant corruption |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 02:39 PM |
#30 |
-
livid |
leftofthedial |
Feb-01-08 12:12 PM |
#7 |
-
Neither. I Thought Of Him As The Same Fraudulent Narcissistic Ignorant Piece Of Shit Jackass As |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Feb-01-08 12:17 PM |
#8 |
 -
Narcissistic is a perfect word to describe Nader. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 02:30 PM |
#23 |
-
I quit focusing on the individual tree years ago and have since tried to focus on the forest. |
Uncle Joe |
Feb-01-08 12:31 PM |
#9 |
-
niether it didn't suprise me a bit |
focusfan |
Feb-01-08 12:34 PM |
#10 |
-
Neither |
Johonny |
Feb-01-08 12:35 PM |
#11 |
 -
Maybe we should use the same tactic. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 02:31 PM |
#24 |
-
He did? Well, that just supports my suspicion of him: Republican. |
WinkyDink |
Feb-01-08 12:36 PM |
#12 |
-
indifferent. he's a jackass. nt. |
IndianaJones |
Feb-01-08 12:36 PM |
#14 |
-
No. nt |
bemildred |
Feb-01-08 12:36 PM |
#15 |
-
Well, Ralph has both more experience and has been correct more often than Hillary. |
TahitiNut |
Feb-01-08 12:55 PM |
#16 |
 -
or obama. nt |
VotesForWomen |
Feb-01-08 02:19 PM |
#19 |
 -
I've never known of any lib in my time take money from the enemy..... |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 02:33 PM |
#25 |
-
I guess you missed the Cynthia McKinney days ... and the Lieberman/Lamont fiasco. |
TahitiNut |
Feb-01-08 02:40 PM |
#32 |
 -
I got to meet Cynthia at our last Beach Impeach on the Berkeley marina. |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 02:48 PM |
#37 |
 -
I remember.. .. she was highly anti-semitic. But why do you compare her to Nader? |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 02:58 PM |
#46 |
  -
Where do you get off calling Cynthia anti-Semitic? |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 03:01 PM |
#52 |
 -
Does your screen name signify your having renounced U.S. citizenship or not? nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 03:04 PM |
#59 |
 -
You didn't answer my question. Where do you get off |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 03:08 PM |
#61 |
 -
I used to think they were. Then I compared them with the Green Party in Europe, and realized.... |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-02-08 09:56 AM |
#78 |
-
That's much more your assertion than fact. Geezus. n/t |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 02:47 PM |
#35 |
-
Nader admitted everything in his last book. I wouldn't help him by spending 2 cents on it... |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 02:48 PM |
#38 |
-
You have a habit of making charges you don't prove. |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 02:58 PM |
#45 |
-
Does your screen name mean that you no longer live in the States, or renounced citizenship? nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 03:01 PM |
#54 |
-
Not to the point, is it? |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 03:02 PM |
#56 |
-
But very significant if you renounced your citizenship, isn't it? nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 03:03 PM |
#58 |
-
No, Sarah, it isn't. You're reaching. And I am a resident |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 03:05 PM |
#60 |
-
I see. Look, I realize lots of people went along with Nader...... |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 03:12 PM |
#62 |
-
Ralph Nader is the trash responsible for the safety of your family |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 03:16 PM |
#63 |
-
Well hoopteedoo. You'd think the Corvair had been the only danger to humans on the planet.... |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 03:20 PM |
#65 |
-
Thank you for laying out your viewpoint. |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 03:24 PM |
#66 |
-
Oi vei. Read his book and stop vociferating. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 03:29 PM |
#67 |
-
Another non-answer. That's cool. n/t |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-02-08 02:01 PM |
#84 |
-
Indifferent.. |
DadOf2LittleAngels |
Feb-01-08 12:58 PM |
#17 |
-
didn't care. it's not about party, it's about principle. nt |
VotesForWomen |
Feb-01-08 02:18 PM |
#18 |
 -
OMG!! A "purist"!! Run for the hills! |
TahitiNut |
Feb-01-08 02:27 PM |
#22 |
 -
Principles? Where does Nader have his principles? No, don't answer that. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 02:34 PM |
#26 |
-
They all take money from just about anyone. Go peek at |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 02:21 PM |
#20 |
 -
No lib has made a plan and accepted money from the Repukes... |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 02:35 PM |
#27 |
-
Go LOOK at the Republican companies that have been funding |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 02:37 PM |
#29 |
-
Did you bother to read what I posted? Or not and merely began typing? nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 02:47 PM |
#36 |
-
Ask yourself that question. You are attacking a minor figure |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 02:53 PM |
#42 |
-
I'm merely calling him a Republican. That's what he is, that's how he behaved. |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 03:00 PM |
#51 |
-
I'm not upset in the least. I'm watching your train wreck. |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 03:01 PM |
#53 |
-
What business is that of ours, none of us support him, right? |
JVS |
Feb-01-08 02:26 PM |
#21 |
 -
It's as much our business as it is to vote. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 02:36 PM |
#28 |
-
I wonder how many votes Nader would have gotten |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 02:43 PM |
#33 |
-
Read Nader's last book. The @-hole admits what he did and is proud of it. |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 02:47 PM |
#34 |
-
What exactly does he admit to? I'd love to know. |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 02:51 PM |
#40 |
-
Read it so you can quit accusing me of making @#$ up. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 02:59 PM |
#47 |
-
Nope. You made the charge. You substantiate it. |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 03:02 PM |
#55 |
-
Do you have a link for that? That Nader "accepted money from the GOP?" |
The Stranger |
Feb-01-08 02:52 PM |
#41 |
 -
it's tired old lie the mouth breathers like to tell themselves. |
KG |
Feb-01-08 03:00 PM |
#49 |
 -
It's in his latest book, tho I'm SURE there has to be some link somewhere nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 03:51 PM |
#68 |
-
You know the routine -- give us the link. Where, as you say, he received money "from the GOP." |
The Stranger |
Feb-01-08 05:12 PM |
#71 |
 -
Read his latest book. It's free in the library. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 06:32 PM |
#74 |
-
Still waiting, Sarah, meanwhile Harry Reid and the Democrat "Leadership" caved on FISA. |
The Stranger |
Feb-01-08 05:46 PM |
#72 |
-
Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country. |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 06:35 PM |
#75 |
-
Not NEARLY as angry as I've REPEATEDLY been at who many Dems take money from |
depakid |
Feb-01-08 02:55 PM |
#44 |
 -
It's a mote and beam problem. n/t |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-01-08 02:59 PM |
#48 |
 -
The Dems who have taken money from corps have not taken it to stand in the way of the Dem candidate |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 03:52 PM |
#69 |
-
No, they've taken it to further the far right agenda |
depakid |
Feb-01-08 04:22 PM |
#70 |
-
The entire country was right wing, and you did nothing to change. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-01-08 06:31 PM |
#73 |
-
Totally pissed! Despite all his rhetoric, he ended up being a tool for the right. |
B Calm |
Feb-01-08 06:35 PM |
#76 |
 -
I agree with you! Nader *is* a willing tool for the right wing. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-02-08 09:58 AM |
#79 |
-
Shows what types of ethics he has |
fortyfeetunder |
Feb-01-08 08:19 PM |
#77 |
 -
Absolutely. Nader has no ethics. He got rich from investing in corporations.... |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-02-08 10:08 AM |
#81 |
-
i wouldn't mind his fate being decided soon |
DiamondJay |
Feb-02-08 09:59 AM |
#80 |
-
I couldn't care less. He's an irrelevance to me. |
robcon |
Feb-02-08 10:35 AM |
#82 |
-
Neither, but I never considered voting for him in the first place. n/t |
Akoto |
Feb-02-08 10:37 AM |
#83 |
-
Neither. Nader wasn't on my radar. n/t |
LWolf |
Feb-02-08 02:18 PM |
#85 |
-
Almost as upset as when I saw Hillary pictured with Rupert Murdoch. n/t |
U4ikLefty |
Feb-02-08 02:25 PM |
#86 |
-
Are you kidding? |
OnionPatch |
Feb-02-08 02:39 PM |
#87 |