the fact that third world cigs are more dangerous or that smoking rates havn't decreased in the west?
Can also give you studies to show that the "increased risk" of cancer associated with "passive smoke" is LOWER than the increased cancer risks of owning a bird (and a million other things)
The issue with ETS studies is that they are almost always based on stats which is NOT the same thing as science.
If a lifetime smoker dies of a heart attack at 95, is it REALLY honest to attribute his heart attack to smoking?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
