You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #49: using distorted and misleading data to make the point about concentration doesnt' help [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
49. using distorted and misleading data to make the point about concentration doesnt' help
Media concentration is a real issue that needs to be addressed. But much of the information in the OP (and in the source cited by the OP, I presume) is misleading and distorted. I've pointed out some of these distortions in an earlier post (#8), particularly as they relate to newspaper and magazines.

I'd also point out that the claim that one in four Internet users "now log on with AOL Time Warner" also doesn't bear up to close scrutiny and/or is misleading. First, without bothering to look it up, I'd bet that the percentage of internet users getting service through AOL or Road Runner is less as a percentage of the total Internet universe than it was several years ago. The growth of DSL generally, and Verizon's FIOS and ATT's U-verse services, together with preciptious subscriber losses by AOL, make me fairly confident of this fact.

It is true that when you combine AOL's numbers with Road Runner's, you get the largest ISP: according to third quarter 2007 data, the two services combined for 18.6 percent of the market (18.4 million subs). That's a sizable number, but its not one in four. And its closely followed by, and being challenged by, ATT, which has 17.5% of the market all by itself (17.4 million subs). And while Road Runner is growing somewhat faster than ATT, this growth advantage is more than offset by AOL's continuing steep losses in subscribership. A couple of charts illustrate the above:

http://www.isp-planet.com/research/rankings/2007/usa_hi...
http://www.isp-planet.com/research/rankings/2007/usa_in...

Again, I'm not downplaying the fact that there are real issues with respect to media consolidation, particularly with regard to radio and also with respect to the growing dominance of the broadcast television networks in the field of cable programming, which crowds out the opportunities for independent voices. But its important to have a solid case based on accurate facts if we are to have any hope of actually getting reform measures considered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC