You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #5: LOL no kidding. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. LOL no kidding.
"Over with" only applies to Republicans. See: GWB, cocaine use, and drunk driving.

The time a Democrat got caught looking at his neighbor's paper on a 3rd grade math test is a VALID CAMPAIGN ISSUE that needs at least a series of attack ads to exploit and question the Democrat's ethics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Do you ever even suspect that the cocaine dust-up may have been a planned thing? NNN0LHI  Jan-17-08 12:05 PM   #0 
  - Of course it was.  TwilightZone   Jan-17-08 12:06 PM   #1 
  - I agree - indeed the dust up reversed black vote so now Obama has a heavy majority  papau   Jan-17-08 12:11 PM   #7 
  - Wow. Are you kidding? Why the hell do you think it would be over with?  jlake   Jan-17-08 12:07 PM   #2 
  - LOL no kidding.  trotsky   Jan-17-08 12:09 PM   #5 
  - With the repubs it will be.  madinmaryland   Jan-17-08 12:08 PM   #3 
  - It was over with before it started b/c he'd already acknowledged it  Debi   Jan-17-08 12:09 PM   #4 
  - The over-reaction to every perceived slight -whether real or imaginary- is not accidental.  MethuenProgressive   Jan-17-08 12:09 PM   #6 
  - Absolutely it was planned; look at all the surrogates who've  babylonsister   Jan-17-08 12:12 PM   #8 
  - I think the OP means that it was part of Obama's plan to bring it up  jlake   Jan-17-08 12:48 PM   #12 
     - That makes no sense because he didn't bring it up  babylonsister   Jan-17-08 01:01 PM   #13 
        - I don't think it does either, but the angle the OP is going for is that  jlake   Jan-17-08 01:02 PM   #14 
  - They'll probably try and trump up some weapons charges.  Skink   Jan-17-08 12:12 PM   #9 
  - I think a bit too tin-foil, but I don't know.  Benhurst   Jan-17-08 12:16 PM   #10 
  - any Dem nom. will be swiftied-hard. He/She needs to be prepared  rodeodance   Jan-17-08 12:18 PM   #11 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC