You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: I read that in Greg Palast's latest book. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
John Gauger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I read that in Greg Palast's latest book.
Armed Madhouse. It was in the chapter about oil. He cited Osama's own website. I was going to check it out myself to confirm, but I figured the government might be watching and I would end up in Gitmo. UBL supposedly made the comment in 1998, when oil prices were at an all-time low. The royal family of Saudi Arabia owed UBL's family billions of dollars for construction work in Mecca and elsewhere. He announced his intentions to overthrow the Saudi government and place himself as heir to Muhammed (I'm not clear as to whether he thinks he is has been chosen for this post by God or if he just thinks it belongs to anyone who is strong enough to take it. Either way, that's what he's after.) His plan next included expelling the Americans from Saudi soil, exterminating the Shiites, and then eliminating Israel. All three of those groups challenge his control of the region's oil. I don't suppose too many other al Qaeda members are interested in this, though. I think they're just in it because they want to destroy America. They join al Qaeda because they are supposedly the biggest danger to us. I guess that could be wrong, but that's the most plausible explaination I've heard so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -How does a stateless criminal organization spread "totalitarianism"? Unperson  Jan-24-07 10:34 AM   #0 
  - Well, it's working on us, isn't it?  Warpy   Jan-24-07 10:36 AM   #1 
  - We have seen the enemy and it is us.  Unperson   Jan-24-07 10:41 AM   #3 
  - See, that's why I should read the thread before I respond.  impeachdubya   Jan-24-07 11:26 AM   #12 
  - Thank you!  Marie26   Jan-24-07 10:37 AM   #2 
  - Well, that's almost possible.  John Gauger   Jan-24-07 10:52 AM   #4 
  - Source?  Unperson   Jan-24-07 10:55 AM   #7 
     - I read that in Greg Palast's latest book.  John Gauger   Jan-24-07 11:11 AM   #8 
  - It doesn't, it can't. * was banking on people not knowing what the word means.  Justitia   Jan-24-07 10:54 AM   #5 
  - Through the imagination of the bush administration.  mmonk   Jan-24-07 10:55 AM   #6 
  - Yes, I agree, if anything it's just plain old tyranny...  originalpckelly   Jan-24-07 11:13 AM   #9 
  - "A stateless criminal organization?"  LongTomH   Jan-24-07 11:21 AM   #10 
  - Lets see- by playing the role of an ill-defined boogeyman, said alleged nebulous stateless  impeachdubya   Jan-24-07 11:25 AM   #11 
  - Easy: they get the Supreme Court to select their representative as President.  damntexdem   Jan-24-07 12:54 PM   #13 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC