acmavm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-06-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. No. This is intentional. The corrupt media have 'picked' our candidates |
|
for us (so they think). And they're trying to saddle us with Hils and Barrie like they have for about a year now.
|
| -So far today I've seen several replays of the comment |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-06-08 10:05 AM |
#0 |
 -
No. This is intentional. The corrupt media have 'picked' our candidates |
acmavm |
Jan-06-08 10:06 AM |
#1 |
| -
that was blowing her top? |
Prefer |
Jan-06-08 10:07 AM |
#2 |
 -
Then why are they only showing the Edwards half of that exchange? n/t |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-06-08 10:12 AM |
#6 |
| -
If that was a man exerting himself in the debate in a forceful way, he'd be called strong and manly |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-06-08 10:13 AM |
#7 |
| -
Oh, so now we're going to go there, eh? |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-06-08 10:19 AM |
#11 |
 -
Yep. It's Be "Clinton's FORCEFUL Reply" |
Crisco |
Jan-06-08 10:29 AM |
#19 |
| -
I AM NOT FUCKING SEXIST GODDAMMIT! WHY ARE THEY |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-06-08 10:34 AM |
#22 |
| -
No one is calling YOU a sexist. Why the defensiveness? The talking heads are sexist |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-06-08 10:49 AM |
#28 |
| -
Edwards People |
LeFleur1 |
Jan-06-08 10:53 AM |
#32 |
| -
HUH? I dunno what "Edwards people" are mad about. I just decided to support him LAST NIGHT |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-06-08 11:00 AM |
#36 |
| -
This is good news! |
madeline_con |
Jan-06-08 11:03 AM |
#37 |
| -
He ROCKS! I'm glad to be aboard. I'm donating to his campaign today for the first time. |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-06-08 11:09 AM |
#40 |
| -
That's because they're scared. |
madeline_con |
Jan-06-08 11:22 AM |
#44 |
| -
... |
Blue State Native |
Jan-06-08 11:13 AM |
#43 |
| -
I DON'T KNOW !!! |
Crisco |
Jan-06-08 11:40 AM |
#48 |
| -
I agree - and the Clinton response was on 3 channels over and over again this morning on cable news |
papau |
Jan-06-08 10:53 AM |
#30 |
| -
Then the proper response to my OP would have been |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-06-08 10:59 AM |
#35 |
| -
LOL - well said - I was trying for real news and even the BBC was running it at that moment! :-) |
papau |
Jan-06-08 11:09 AM |
#41 |
| -
I didn't watch the debate, but I saw the clip on youtube |
Truth Hurts A Lot |
Jan-06-08 10:09 AM |
#3 |
| -
She was practically yelling. She lost it. Besides, the question |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-06-08 10:10 AM |
#4 |
| -
You must have seen it somewhere.... |
Toots |
Jan-06-08 10:14 AM |
#8 |
| -
Um...I watched the debate. n/t |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-06-08 10:18 AM |
#10 |
| -
Were you there in person or did you see it on the MSM? |
Toots |
Jan-06-08 10:37 AM |
#24 |
| -
Answer the question: Why aren't they showing it? n/t |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-06-08 10:40 AM |
#27 |
| -
I don't think she lost it |
never_get_over_it |
Jan-06-08 10:19 AM |
#12 |
| -
I'm not sexist. Never have been. And, I have been a fan |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-06-08 10:24 AM |
#16 |
| -
here YOU are picking and choosing what you want people to see - U must be media nt |
msongs |
Jan-06-08 10:28 AM |
#18 |
| -
Then why are they only showing Edwards serve and |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-06-08 10:32 AM |
#21 |
| -
Ok let me see if I can make this a little clearer |
never_get_over_it |
Jan-06-08 11:47 AM |
#50 |
| -
I thought she performed well - but she lost her cool and turned me off |
dmordue |
Jan-06-08 10:12 AM |
#5 |
| -
That's because they are lying - Hillary never blew her top. |
Rosemary2205 |
Jan-06-08 10:16 AM |
#9 |
| -
Oh god! Now we're going to make it about gender. In that case, |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-06-08 10:19 AM |
#13 |
| -
That's not what I said. |
Rosemary2205 |
Jan-06-08 10:27 AM |
#17 |
| -
Whatever? |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-06-08 10:29 AM |
#20 |
| -
The clip is too long for a news broadcast |
taterguy |
Jan-06-08 10:22 AM |
#14 |
| -
I have seen her response again and again. They just do not have the DU slant |
Evergreen Emerald |
Jan-06-08 10:23 AM |
#15 |
| -
Hillary did fine in that clip |
kurth |
Jan-06-08 10:34 AM |
#23 |
| -
Comparable in every way to the "Dean scream", and yet-- no play. |
Marr |
Jan-06-08 10:38 AM |
#25 |
| -
Ding. Ding. Ding. Thank you. n/t |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-06-08 10:40 AM |
#26 |
| -
That's what "losing your temper" looks like where you live? |
WilliamPitt |
Jan-06-08 10:53 AM |
#31 |
| -
In the context of that discussion, yes. |
Marr |
Jan-06-08 02:11 PM |
#55 |
| -
IMO, it wasn't all THAT. Yes, she defended her position, but |
madeline_con |
Jan-06-08 11:07 AM |
#39 |
| -
So now are you saying the focus on the Dean Scream was the RIGHT THING TO DO? |
mondo joe |
Jan-06-08 11:41 AM |
#49 |
| -
No, I'm saying Hillary Clinton is being treated with kid gloves by the corporate media. |
Marr |
Jan-06-08 02:04 PM |
#54 |
| -
I thought she handled that riposte rather well. |
WilliamPitt |
Jan-06-08 10:51 AM |
#29 |
| -
"Banana split with fudge sauce and extra sprinkles"...BINGO! I thought she kicked ass on that reply. |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-06-08 10:58 AM |
#34 |
| -
If being forceful in the course of defending a double teamed flurry of pointed buzz words... |
bridgit |
Jan-06-08 10:57 AM |
#33 |
| -
I'm an Edwards supporter. I saw the exchange, and you are completely wrong. |
Shakespeare |
Jan-06-08 11:06 AM |
#38 |
| -
Obama supporter here - |
janeaustin |
Jan-06-08 11:26 AM |
#45 |
| -
My take is that it gives Edwards some much needed exposure for free. |
Didereaux |
Jan-06-08 11:10 AM |
#42 |
| -
WHAT she said was far, far more DAMNING than HOW she said it. |
TahitiNut |
Jan-06-08 11:31 AM |
#46 |
| -
Very well said, TahitiNut. And with yours and WillPitt's comments |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-06-08 11:37 AM |
#47 |
| -
I've just read your journal entry and you are so totally right on! |
scarletwoman |
Jan-06-08 12:03 PM |
#52 |
| -
Thanks. The baby is drowning in all that dirty bathwater. |
TahitiNut |
Jan-06-08 12:17 PM |
#53 |
| -
Not a blow job |
NancyG |
Jan-06-08 11:50 AM |
#51 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread