donkeyotay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |
| 64. This divisiveness issue is teevee induced. Once again it's complete bull. |
|
Those who have voted GOP ought to be the ones searching their souls for where they went wrong and what THEY might do to change. How did the burden to apologize/change get placed onto the media's favorite whipping boy, the Left?
We should continue to try and wrest control of the allegedly democratic party from corporate control. Where the GOPers want to go from here is their problem. I, for one, am not going to stop fighting for my country.
|
| -Edwards' New Strategy Against Obama: Who Can Best Deliver Change, A Lover Or A Fighter? |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 11:53 AM |
#0 |
 -
change/hope - the mantra from huckabee/romney/obama/HRC AND edwards last night nt |
msongs |
Jan-04-08 11:55 AM |
#1 |
| -
Is he talking about how he fought really hard for Bush's illegal war? |
Dawgs |
Jan-04-08 12:03 PM |
#2 |
  -
no |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:05 PM |
#5 |
| -
It's a pity he never decided to fight when he was in the Senate, or when he was the VP nominee. |
Occam Bandage |
Jan-04-08 12:08 PM |
# |
| -
that's just baseless nonsense |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:19 PM |
#19 |
| -
Okay, so the only instance of Edwards fighting for someone besides himself is |
Occam Bandage |
Jan-04-08 12:22 PM |
#21 |
| -
I'm certain you really don't want an answer |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:26 PM |
#30 |
| -
I'm certain you really don't have one. |
Occam Bandage |
Jan-04-08 01:54 PM |
#56 |
| -
does that mean you're interested? |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 02:05 PM |
#60 |
| -
Pretty moral when you fight for poor people |
surfermaw |
Jan-04-08 01:59 PM |
#59 |
| -
And if Edwards had gone for the $100,000, he wouldn't have made millions for himself either. |
Occam Bandage |
Jan-04-08 02:06 PM |
#61 |
| -
He fought for his clients....but it was his job, and he was |
FrenchieCat |
Jan-04-08 12:22 PM |
#22 |
| -
and he would have been more effective as a penniless monk? |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:29 PM |
#31 |
| -
That's not my point, and you know it! |
FrenchieCat |
Jan-04-08 12:56 PM |
#48 |
| -
He would have fought all over the south if Kerry would have let him |
surfermaw |
Jan-04-08 01:54 PM |
#55 |
| -
Yeah. That's why he was a pushover in '04. Kerry made him. I assume Kerry also |
Occam Bandage |
Jan-04-08 01:59 PM |
#58 |
| -
Has he changed his website yet regarding his stance on troop pullouts? |
cryingshame |
Jan-04-08 12:23 PM |
#25 |
| -
I think lovers, definitely |
frazzled |
Jan-04-08 12:04 PM |
#3 |
| -
fight or love |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:06 PM |
#7 |
| -
Fight them by being a lover. |
Occam Bandage |
Jan-04-08 12:15 PM |
#17 |
| -
There's nothing wrong at all with being 'angry' |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:24 PM |
#26 |
| -
I don't think he is seeing himself as a lover, I think he is seeing the other candidate as the lover |
surfermaw |
Jan-04-08 01:55 PM |
#57 |
| -
Yeah! Here is K. Gibran on Love... |
ClayZ |
Jan-04-08 12:16 PM |
#18 |
| -
Just for the sake of argument , what makes you think the |
midnight |
Jan-04-08 12:26 PM |
#29 |
| -
A lover... |
Sulawesi |
Jan-04-08 12:05 PM |
#4 |
| -
A lover. Fighters just lead to polarization and gridlock. Besides, Edwards is neither. |
Occam Bandage |
Jan-04-08 12:06 PM |
#6 |
| -
aren't we all |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:08 PM |
#10 |
| -
Nobody has the power to perfectly effect all they say. Edwards, however, |
Occam Bandage |
Jan-04-08 12:13 PM |
#16 |
| -
I vote love. hands down. |
jakem |
Jan-04-08 12:08 PM |
#8 |
| -
I think his stance may be a serious mistake.... |
BlackVelvet04 |
Jan-04-08 12:08 PM |
#9 |
| -
who stands in the way of the changes we say we want? |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:10 PM |
#12 |
| -
Hey, I'm not taking sides here.... |
BlackVelvet04 |
Jan-04-08 12:12 PM |
#15 |
| -
I prefer a Peacemaker to a warmonger..... |
FrenchieCat |
Jan-04-08 12:09 PM |
#11 |
| -
no justice |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:11 PM |
#14 |
| -
They are the warmongers....... |
FrenchieCat |
Jan-04-08 12:20 PM |
#20 |
| -
that's purely your own characterization |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:25 PM |
#27 |
| -
I fully agree with you |
Bodhi BloodWave |
Jan-04-08 12:26 PM |
#28 |
| -
That's worked real well with Bush, hasn't it? |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:31 PM |
#32 |
| -
Well, i think most here agree that bush is an |
Bodhi BloodWave |
Jan-04-08 12:39 PM |
#38 |
| -
so he intends to use the stick if they don't respond, or not? |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:41 PM |
#41 |
| -
the way i see it, he would use the stick(aka fight) if he had to yes |
Bodhi BloodWave |
Jan-04-08 12:49 PM |
#45 |
| -
Iowa turnout was a referendum on bipartisanship |
OzarkDem |
Jan-04-08 12:10 PM |
#13 |
| -
Edwards most certainly IS the candidate of "glamor" in the magickal sense of being a bullshiter |
cryingshame |
Jan-04-08 12:22 PM |
#23 |
| -
as if he's alone in that |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:32 PM |
# |
| -
whether he is sincere or not, I love the things he says |
hfojvt |
Jan-04-08 12:40 PM |
#39 |
| -
Here's exactly what I want. |
Sentinel Chicken |
Jan-04-08 12:23 PM |
#24 |
| -
Beating them down won't really do anything except feed their wish for revenge |
Bodhi BloodWave |
Jan-04-08 12:32 PM |
#33 |
| -
who said anything about 'beating them down'? |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:38 PM |
#36 |
| -
I'm really uncommitted as of now. |
Sentinel Chicken |
Jan-04-08 12:49 PM |
#43 |
| -
True some of his supporters are dissing others(and i say that as an Obama supporter) |
Bodhi BloodWave |
Jan-04-08 12:59 PM |
#49 |
| -
I said this on another thread, but America doesn't want fighting. It wants |
wienerdoggie |
Jan-04-08 12:32 PM |
#34 |
| -
That's not going to move ANY republican off of their corporatism or their obstructionism |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 12:40 PM |
#40 |
| -
I'm not telling you what we as a party should or shouldn't do to |
wienerdoggie |
Jan-04-08 12:50 PM |
#46 |
| -
"All we need is love, love, love is all we need" - ever hear of "Swift Boaters" |
Peregrine Took |
Jan-04-08 12:47 PM |
#42 |
| -
He'll do fine. I have full confidence in him. People sense a goodness about him, |
wienerdoggie |
Jan-04-08 12:53 PM |
#47 |
| -
I'll take a fighter. A lover of corporate campaign contributions |
judaspriestess |
Jan-04-08 12:33 PM |
#35 |
| -
And I second that choice! |
Plucketeer |
Jan-04-08 01:03 PM |
#50 |
| -
Very well put by John Edwards. A promise of unspecificed, "abstract" |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Jan-04-08 12:38 PM |
#37 |
| -
Continuing the Fight in New Hampshire: |
rodeodance |
Jan-04-08 12:49 PM |
#44 |
| -
"I am not the candidate of glamor" |
Scriptor Ignotus |
Jan-04-08 01:39 PM |
#51 |
| -
i'm sure he'd welcome some analogy which had nothing to do with what he was talking about |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 01:46 PM |
#53 |
| -
"This time around, every vote will be counted" - 2004 - the last time he promised to fight |
robbedvoter |
Jan-04-08 01:46 PM |
#52 |
| -
he had another fight, at that time, for the health of his wife |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 01:50 PM |
#54 |
| -
They allowed the country believe Bush won... |
robbedvoter |
Jan-04-08 02:11 PM |
#62 |
| -
that's pretty weak |
bigtree |
Jan-04-08 02:17 PM |
#63 |
| -
This divisiveness issue is teevee induced. Once again it's complete bull. |
donkeyotay |
Jan-04-08 02:40 PM |
#64 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread