You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #118: I think he's saying if you are about to get killed or seriously injured [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #63
118. I think he's saying if you are about to get killed or seriously injured
to punch or grab a 2x4 to deal with it.

he is not saying to do that when the cat wets on the carpet.

let's not make more out of his post than he indicated. his advice was for a very specific circumstance and is obviously and explicitly to avoid severe injury. while you or i could be mauled, maimed or killed in this situation, against a large animal, preventing that from happening is not likely to do the same harm to the animal.

that was his point and he is balancing the risks so as to avoid the most harm to either the animal or the person.

if you want to tease him or joke with him about the 2x4 that's one thing, but bunch of folks here are very seriously accusing this man of wanton animal abuse which is not what he is advocating. you guys (some of you, some that i like from the lounge even) are losing the context here.

the point is had the 17-year old when confronted with the tiger, punched the tiger or used a stick to get his attention, the tiger would likely not have been harmed seriously due to its size, strength and thick noggin and the 17-year old might have been spared his life. yes in that instance with that outcome, the 2x4 is a better alternative for both boy and tiger. now both are dead.

and by the way, if you let the animal attack you and you die, it may be put down anyway.

so think this through and if you don't want to at least read dawg's messages thoroughly because i think he explained himself quite well, with patience and re-explanation while folks here mocked him by making him out to be giving advice he didn't really give or intend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC