bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-26-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 21. N o - i'm what's known as a blogwhore |
|
That's my personal blog.
Bryant
|
| -Could you support a President who believed Extra-marital-hetero sexual sex to be a sin? |
bryant69 |
Dec-26-07 10:20 AM |
#0 |
 -
I support the idea that it's none of their business. nt |
babylonsister |
Dec-26-07 10:21 AM |
#1 |
| -
I really wish I could answer that this was a stupid poll, but alas |
TechBear_Seattle |
Dec-26-07 10:21 AM |
#2 |
  -
It's sort of in reaction to the Gay Marriage/Obama kefluffle |
bryant69 |
Dec-26-07 10:28 AM |
#12 |
| -
Which candidate are we talking about here? |
wienerdoggie |
Dec-26-07 10:21 AM |
#3 |
| -
Follow up question: Will this candidate keep their religious views out of politics entirely? |
SteppingRazor |
Dec-26-07 10:22 AM |
#4 |
| -
Well that's the question. |
bryant69 |
Dec-26-07 10:24 AM |
#8 |
| -
Here's the thing, though... |
SteppingRazor |
Dec-26-07 10:29 AM |
#14 |
| -
Actually there are very few mainstream churches who don't believe extra-marital sex to be a sin |
bryant69 |
Dec-26-07 10:33 AM |
#15 |
| -
But that's a false analogy. |
SteppingRazor |
Dec-26-07 10:43 AM |
#17 |
| -
True enough |
bryant69 |
Dec-26-07 10:50 AM |
#20 |
| -
None that I've heard of, and I would certainly be curious to see an answer. |
SteppingRazor |
Dec-26-07 10:52 AM |
#23 |
| -
Why Couldn't They? |
iamjoy |
Dec-26-07 12:11 PM |
#33 |
| -
Delete |
ProfessorGAC |
Dec-26-07 10:22 AM |
#5 |
| -
I don't care. I could support such a person or not. |
robcon |
Dec-26-07 10:22 AM |
#6 |
| -
Very few people would support it as OK |
treestar |
Dec-26-07 10:23 AM |
#7 |
| -
Anyone who talks in terms of "sin" is showing their irrationality. Therefore, |
T Wolf |
Dec-26-07 10:24 AM |
#9 |
| -
I second that! nt |
0007 |
Dec-26-07 10:27 AM |
#10 |
| -
Well, You're Right |
ProfessorGAC |
Dec-26-07 10:27 AM |
# |
| -
Do you believe there is such a thing as "sin" or "good" or "evil"? |
winter999 |
Dec-26-07 10:40 AM |
#16 |
| -
most poeple use sin in a religious sense; i.e. an affront to God n/t |
bryant69 |
Dec-26-07 10:53 AM |
#24 |
| -
Then I Eschew That Definition |
ProfessorGAC |
Dec-26-07 10:54 AM |
#26 |
| -
I continue to move toward the thought that RELIGIOUS belief... |
Tyler Durden |
Dec-26-07 10:27 AM |
#11 |
| -
ANd if they say that- can you believe them? n/t |
bryant69 |
Dec-26-07 10:29 AM |
#13 |
| -
Nope. |
Tyler Durden |
Dec-26-07 11:00 AM |
#28 |
| -
Yes, as long as they separate that from policy. |
aikoaiko |
Dec-26-07 01:01 PM |
#34 |
| -
Your link doesn't have anything about ex. marital sex |
soleft |
Dec-26-07 10:45 AM |
#18 |
| -
N o - i'm what's known as a blogwhore |
bryant69 |
Dec-26-07 10:51 AM |
#21 |
| -
As long as they're not trying to legislate it, |
rucky |
Dec-26-07 10:47 AM |
#19 |
| -
I look forward to a day where religous beliefs don't detirmine eligibility |
Marrah_G |
Dec-26-07 10:52 AM |
#22 |
| -
As long as he or she respects the First amendment |
Lilith Velkor |
Dec-26-07 10:54 AM |
#25 |
| -
What is a "sin"? |
tekisui |
Dec-26-07 10:54 AM |
#27 |
| -
so you are looking for an atheist/non-religious candidate |
bryant69 |
Dec-26-07 11:31 AM |
#30 |
| -
Do you mean |
Annces |
Dec-26-07 11:26 AM |
#29 |
| -
If they think it, even if they express an opinion when asked, I'm okay with that. |
blondeatlast |
Dec-26-07 11:36 AM |
#31 |
| -
I take it we're not talkin' Republican candidate, here ... |
zbdent |
Dec-26-07 11:59 AM |
#32 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread