LWolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-28-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 135. Kucinich would, obviously. |
|
Biden might. I haven't heard any of the rest mention possible support for impeachment, so I doubt if they would prosecute.
|
| -If Hillary becomes president will she prosecute Bush for his crimes? |
undeterred |
Dec-25-07 05:53 PM |
#0 |
 -
Will Edwards? Would Obama? How about Kucinich? Or Biden? |
PeaceNikki |
Dec-25-07 05:56 PM |
#1 |
 -
Kucinich has already said... |
Hell Hath No Fury |
Dec-25-07 06:02 PM |
#4 |
| -
Kucinich can say that he's going to deploy monkey-powered solar mind control sunshine rays... |
yibbehobba |
Dec-25-07 06:41 PM |
#23 |
| -
The sunshine rays don't combat hunger, they're only a mild appetite suppressant |
Kucinich4America |
Dec-25-07 11:53 PM |
#63 |
| -
LOL! |
Le Taz Hot |
Dec-26-07 05:40 AM |
#73 |
 -
Haha, I like your sense of humor sir |
Hippo_Tron |
Dec-26-07 09:39 AM |
#108 |
| -
That was the funniest thing i have seen all day |
GA_ArmyVet |
Dec-26-07 07:49 PM |
#131 |
| -
And is it a sitting president's place to do such a thing? |
PeaceNikki |
Dec-25-07 06:56 PM |
#30 |
| -
Obama said no in South Carolina last summer...no DOJ investigation period |
Didereaux |
Dec-25-07 08:19 PM |
#55 |
| -
Obama has said the second thing he would do is undo Bush's signing statements! |
Dems Will Win |
Dec-26-07 09:02 AM |
#105 |
| -
Kucinch Already IS Trying to Get Dick Impeached |
fascisthunter |
Dec-26-07 09:49 AM |
#112 |
| -
Kucinich would, obviously. |
LWolf |
Dec-28-07 07:12 PM |
#135 |
| -
My guess is that NO ONE will prosecute ShrubCo! |
napi21 |
Dec-25-07 05:59 PM |
#2 |
| -
Kucinich has called for investigations as soon as things happen |
undeterred |
Dec-25-07 06:14 PM |
#9 |
| -
Some guy upthread said |
nathan hale |
Dec-26-07 02:01 AM |
#69 |
| -
And you know... maybe the new administration should focus on undoing all the bad stuff this one's |
PeaceNikki |
Dec-26-07 10:24 AM |
#119 |
| -
Hillary is connected to * through Jackson Stephens. No way will she prosecute. |
mod mom |
Dec-25-07 06:00 PM |
#3 |
| -
If she would promise to do this, I'd give her my last dime. |
Rageneau |
Dec-25-07 06:02 PM |
#5 |
| -
What you said. n/t |
timeforarevolution |
Dec-25-07 08:09 PM |
#54 |
| -
last dime given After it's done. No promises. n/t |
Whisp |
Dec-26-07 12:15 AM |
#66 |
| -
Clinton would prosecute... |
Hell Hath No Fury |
Dec-25-07 06:03 PM |
#6 |
| -
Be sure to Video tape that & post it on the Net. |
Disturbed |
Dec-25-07 06:08 PM |
#8 |
| -
Well I'm not sure which event I'd rather watch |
undeterred |
Dec-25-07 06:18 PM |
#12 |
| -
Highly unlikely. nt |
citizen_jane |
Dec-25-07 06:08 PM |
#7 |
| -
In a Larry Craig way ,yes. |
bahrbearian |
Dec-25-07 06:16 PM |
#10 |
| -
Are you saying she will take a wide stance on prosecution... |
undeterred |
Dec-25-07 06:20 PM |
#13 |
| -
I don't believe that I've heard her mention it either--for good reason. |
wicasa |
Dec-25-07 06:17 PM |
#11 |
| -
Well, we sure don't have an independent attorney general |
undeterred |
Dec-25-07 06:21 PM |
#15 |
| -
You are right--we do not. |
wicasa |
Dec-25-07 06:26 PM |
#17 |
| -
No, and most consider it a problem. |
igil |
Dec-25-07 06:33 PM |
#20 |
| -
None of them will. |
emilyg |
Dec-25-07 06:20 PM |
#14 |
| -
Kucinich would! n/t |
wildbilln864 |
Dec-25-07 07:13 PM |
#43 |
| -
In a word, No. |
Hailtothechimp |
Dec-25-07 06:25 PM |
#16 |
| -
No |
proud2Blib |
Dec-25-07 06:27 PM |
#18 |
| -
Heck no - Bill will probably invite the whole Bush gang over for Texas ribs! nt |
polichick |
Dec-25-07 06:31 PM |
#19 |
| -
No. |
Blue-Jay |
Dec-25-07 06:38 PM |
#21 |
| -
Exactly right |
terrya |
Dec-25-07 06:43 PM |
#24 |
| -
Hi Terry! |
Blue-Jay |
Dec-25-07 06:51 PM |
#27 |
| -
Awww...thanks, Blue-Jay |
terrya |
Dec-25-07 07:08 PM |
#38 |
| -
You're the best, my friend. |
Blue-Jay |
Dec-25-07 07:11 PM |
#42 |
| -
So the president of the United States gets away |
undeterred |
Dec-25-07 06:45 PM |
#25 |
| -
Yep. That's how it's gonna happen. |
Blue-Jay |
Dec-25-07 06:49 PM |
#26 |
| -
Don't vote for Clinton. |
Tesha |
Dec-25-07 07:02 PM |
#32 |
| -
I'd have to have Traumatic Brain Injury to vote for Hillary |
undeterred |
Dec-25-07 07:06 PM |
#35 |
| -
I'll happily vote for Sen Clinton if she's our nominee. |
Blue-Jay |
Dec-25-07 07:07 PM |
#36 |
| -
Then don't be surprised when a Bush wins in 2012 or 2016, okay? (NT) |
Tesha |
Dec-26-07 06:18 AM |
#76 |
| -
That doesn't even make any sense. |
Blue-Jay |
Dec-26-07 06:33 PM |
#128 |
| -
You may not like it, but it (will) make sense. |
Tesha |
Dec-28-07 06:05 AM |
#132 |
| -
Why single out Clinton? |
MonkeyFunk |
Dec-25-07 11:48 PM |
#62 |
| -
Probably because this lack-of-investigation and/or prosecution was her husbands *FIRST BIG MISTAKE* |
Tesha |
Dec-26-07 06:28 AM |
#82 |
| -
Nah |
MonkeyFunk |
Dec-26-07 07:14 AM |
#87 |
| -
Then you surely won't mind that I'll never vote for Clinton, okay? |
Tesha |
Dec-26-07 07:17 AM |
#89 |
| -
That kinda ruins Christmas |
undeterred |
Dec-25-07 07:04 PM |
#33 |
| -
I don't believe that. |
Blue-Jay |
Dec-25-07 07:10 PM |
#40 |
| -
Frankly, I don't give a damn |
Zensea |
Dec-25-07 06:40 PM |
#22 |
| -
It won't happen. |
cloudbase |
Dec-25-07 06:53 PM |
#28 |
| -
The President prosecutes people? |
MethuenProgressive |
Dec-25-07 06:54 PM |
#29 |
| -
Lasttime I checked, the Justice Department (which does prosecute people) is part of the Executive... |
Tesha |
Dec-25-07 07:05 PM |
#34 |
| -
" it gores their shitbag of a candidate." How dare you accuse me of being for Obama!! |
MethuenProgressive |
Dec-25-07 07:17 PM |
#46 |
| -
Again |
MonkeyFunk |
Dec-26-07 12:31 AM |
#67 |
| -
See my reply elsewhere on the thread. (NT) |
Tesha |
Dec-26-07 06:20 AM |
#77 |
| -
I did |
MonkeyFunk |
Dec-26-07 07:15 AM |
#88 |
| -
as I recall, a lot of folks here were concerned about the WH dictating to DOJ |
onenote |
Dec-26-07 07:39 AM |
#94 |
| -
Everything in moderation. |
Tesha |
Dec-26-07 07:43 AM |
#97 |
| -
Absolutely not. |
Tesha |
Dec-25-07 06:57 PM |
#31 |
| -
Strictly speaking, presidents can't do that. |
ocelot |
Dec-25-07 07:07 PM |
#37 |
| -
Facts seem to have little bearing on the Strawperson builders. |
MethuenProgressive |
Dec-25-07 07:18 PM |
#47 |
| -
The Attorney General serves at the pleasure of the President. |
Tesha |
Dec-26-07 06:22 AM |
#78 |
| -
Yes, of course I know that. But the OP's question was whether Hillary, |
ocelot |
Dec-26-07 10:30 AM |
#122 |
| -
Of course not! |
wildbilln864 |
Dec-25-07 07:09 PM |
#39 |
| -
I shall answer this question in pantomime: |
scarletwoman |
Dec-25-07 07:11 PM |
#41 |
| -
Wow! Ron Paul gets more love here more than Clinton |
PeaceNikki |
Dec-25-07 07:13 PM |
#44 |
| -
No but the Democratic |
Le Taz Hot |
Dec-26-07 05:46 AM |
#74 |
| -
After careful consideration, I shall deliver my answer through interpretive dance |
slackmaster |
Dec-25-07 07:14 PM |
#45 |
| -
LOL!!!!!!!!!!! She's just like one of them! |
Mark_Pogue |
Dec-25-07 07:51 PM |
#48 |
| -
Ok nimrods, the President doesn't "prosecute" anything, the AG does |
ShaneGR |
Dec-25-07 07:53 PM |
#49 |
| -
And the AG serves at the pleasure of the President |
havocmom |
Dec-25-07 09:50 PM |
#60 |
| -
(It's amazing how many people don't get this, isn't it?) |
Tesha |
Dec-26-07 06:23 AM |
#79 |
| -
so you think the WH-controlled Gonzalez DOJ was just peachy? |
onenote |
Dec-26-07 07:40 AM |
#95 |
| -
Setting some general, *PUBLICLY-ACKNOWLEDGED* guidelines is fine. |
Tesha |
Dec-26-07 07:48 AM |
#100 |
| -
directing the DOJ to prosecute specific individuals for specific acts |
onenote |
Dec-26-07 07:50 AM |
#101 |
| -
Did I say that? I'm suggesting that we *ENFORCE THE LAW*. |
Tesha |
Dec-26-07 07:56 AM |
#102 |
| -
Talk about cheap tricks: Here are your own words: |
onenote |
Dec-26-07 09:43 AM |
#109 |
| -
And all I'm suggesting is that the President permit and encourage the Justice Department... |
Tesha |
Dec-26-07 09:58 AM |
#113 |
| -
You are correct about many with willful ignorance. No amount of explaination helps with some |
havocmom |
Dec-26-07 12:26 PM |
#127 |
| -
The Executive Branch enforces the law, so the President does, in a sense prosecute. |
Rageneau |
Dec-26-07 12:32 AM |
#68 |
| -
A special prosecutor |
Donna Zen |
Dec-25-07 07:53 PM |
#50 |
| -
it was bill that said she should send |
madrchsod |
Dec-25-07 08:08 PM |
#53 |
| -
Powell was over rated to begin with |
Donna Zen |
Dec-25-07 08:22 PM |
#57 |
| -
no she can`t |
madrchsod |
Dec-25-07 08:05 PM |
#51 |
| -
Criminal investigations and prosecutions are up to the Executive Branch, not the Legislature. (NT) |
Tesha |
Dec-26-07 06:26 AM |
#81 |
| -
No way. Never. Not in a million years. |
DutchLiberal |
Dec-25-07 08:06 PM |
#52 |
| -
You are joking, aren't you? |
notsodumbhillbilly |
Dec-25-07 08:21 PM |
#56 |
| -
Edwards for sure. |
disndat |
Dec-25-07 09:16 PM |
#58 |
| -
No. DLC. |
mmonk |
Dec-25-07 09:43 PM |
#59 |
| -
No. nt |
ladjf |
Dec-25-07 11:37 PM |
#61 |
| -
Of course not |
Bright Eyes |
Dec-25-07 11:58 PM |
#64 |
| -
Like Iraq |
autorank |
Dec-26-07 12:02 AM |
#65 |
| -
No. Never. 0% chance. Not just 0.0001% but absolute zero. |
tom_paine |
Dec-26-07 02:11 AM |
#70 |
| -
shhhh, don't give the cons reason to steal another election! |
B Calm |
Dec-26-07 05:33 AM |
#71 |
| -
Ask her. |
LeftCoast |
Dec-26-07 05:34 AM |
#72 |
| -
None of them will |
Marrah_G |
Dec-26-07 05:56 AM |
#75 |
| -
Hillary is the establishment status quo. No way in HELL does she prosecute anyone. |
sarcasmo |
Dec-26-07 06:25 AM |
#80 |
| -
No. The POTUS does have the power to prosecute anyone. That would be up to the justice department. |
default_to_freedom |
Dec-26-07 06:28 AM |
#83 |
| -
No. She'll be much too busy fighting off attacks from misguided progressives in her own party. |
Perry Logan |
Dec-26-07 06:33 AM |
#84 |
| -
That's okay -- she has *YOU* to defend her. (NT) |
Tesha |
Dec-26-07 07:18 AM |
#90 |
| -
And there are so many of us it will be a full time job! |
undeterred |
Dec-26-07 07:36 AM |
#92 |
| -
Moot question: Hillary Clinton is never going to be President of the United States ... never. |
ThomWV |
Dec-26-07 07:02 AM |
#85 |
| -
Aw, you're sweet. |
undeterred |
Dec-26-07 07:37 AM |
#93 |
| -
Edwards is a free man and an attorney |
Truth Hurts A Lot |
Dec-26-07 07:05 AM |
#86 |
| -
They are hoping that we will forget....NO. |
GigiMommy |
Dec-26-07 07:22 AM |
#91 |
| -
She would be in the worst position to help it along... |
rucky |
Dec-26-07 07:42 AM |
#96 |
| -
You've got to be kidding. Any hint of charges against Shrub and Cheney |
Vinca |
Dec-26-07 07:45 AM |
#98 |
| -
Are you kidding? Hillary & most of Congress are complicit at this point. |
TheGoldenRule |
Dec-26-07 07:47 AM |
#99 |
| -
From my perspective the answer is NO. The rich and powerful always seem to cover each others asses |
IsItJustMe |
Dec-26-07 08:37 AM |
#103 |
| -
Did Bill? n/t |
JTFrog |
Dec-26-07 08:46 AM |
#104 |
| -
absolutely Bill covered for the * crime family and the Reagan criminals.. |
flyarm |
Dec-26-07 10:22 AM |
#118 |
| -
What's priority here? |
Telly Savalas |
Dec-26-07 09:21 AM |
#106 |
| -
Well I'm not expecting any of the first three |
undeterred |
Dec-26-07 09:47 AM |
#110 |
| -
No. |
Tesha |
Dec-26-07 09:59 AM |
#114 |
| -
You're not expecting any positive policy developments |
Telly Savalas |
Dec-26-07 11:25 AM |
#126 |
| -
Bwahahahahahahaha!!!! |
Javaman |
Dec-26-07 09:32 AM |
#107 |
| -
She will probably give him a medal. |
dkofos |
Dec-26-07 09:48 AM |
#111 |
| -
The medal of freedom |
undeterred |
Dec-26-07 10:19 AM |
#117 |
| -
Is that freedom from being prosecuted?? |
dkofos |
Dec-26-07 10:33 AM |
#123 |
| -
Freedom from being laughed at |
undeterred |
Dec-26-07 10:41 AM |
#124 |
| -
Sorry the pun but She ain't got the balls, just like the rest of the Dems |
benld74 |
Dec-26-07 10:08 AM |
#115 |
| -
No she won't..Bill and papa B are best friends you know!! BABS has called Bill her adopted son .. |
flyarm |
Dec-26-07 10:14 AM |
#116 |
| -
DLC, aka the Democratic Leadership CORPORATION n/t |
antigop |
Dec-26-07 07:20 PM |
#129 |
| -
They are ALL the same criminals |
Neo |
Dec-26-07 10:26 AM |
#120 |
| -
Quite the leading hypothetical question... |
LanternWaste |
Dec-26-07 10:30 AM |
#121 |
| -
You owe me a new screen! |
ceile |
Dec-26-07 10:50 AM |
#125 |
| -
i'm gonna go with no |
sniffa |
Dec-26-07 07:27 PM |
#130 |
| -
You mean the crimes she's complicit in? No. |
Orsino |
Dec-28-07 07:18 AM |
#133 |
| -
she won't do not one thing with Bush or Cheney |
focusfan |
Dec-28-07 05:59 PM |
#134 |
| -
Is it possible for shrub to |
usaftmo |
Dec-28-07 07:27 PM |
#136 |
| -
What crimes? |
Swamp Rat |
Dec-28-07 07:35 PM |
#137 |
| -
Thank you, Swamp Rat! |
undeterred |
Dec-28-07 08:21 PM |
#138 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread