You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: First off, your assumption can be disputed [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. First off, your assumption can be disputed
Second, Edwards is not the only white male in politics. If everyone made your assumption, Obama and HRC wouldn't be far ahead of edwards. But assume they all realize this. Not only are we a less deserving country, buy the race instantly transforms - when the choice is then Edwards and the second tier candidates but possibly someone like Gore. (If I'm making zero probability comments, let's make two.) It doesn't have to make Edwards the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -OK, it's Edwards v Romney. And it's all settled by March 1 cali  Dec-12-07 07:44 AM   #0 
  - We can have 5 months of 527 Mormon ads.  tekisui   Dec-12-07 07:55 AM   #1 
  - Not trying to discourage anyone from voting for Edwards! yet, don't  EV_Ares   Dec-12-07 08:01 AM   #2 
  - Do you run around in all the threads that criticize Obama or Clinton  cali   Dec-12-07 08:06 AM   #3 
     - Do you go around and bash Edwards all the time? I have  EV_Ares   Dec-12-07 08:09 AM   #6 
        - Cali, you will be much better off if you just vote for who we tell you to vote for.  King Coal   Dec-12-07 08:42 AM   #14 
  - Guess I'll just have to vote for Romney  last_texas_dem   Dec-12-07 08:06 AM   #4 
     - Just pointing out why Edwards may not be the sure thing  cali   Dec-12-07 08:08 AM   #5 
        - You forgot about the latest poll that shows he is the only dem candidate  EV_Ares   Dec-12-07 08:13 AM   #7 
           - Everyone will hate me but, "electabilty, electability, electability"  NightWatcher   Dec-12-07 08:16 AM   #8 
           - nonsense. There's really no way you can accurately make that statement.  cali   Dec-12-07 08:20 AM   #10 
           - First off, your assumption can be disputed  karynnj   Dec-12-07 09:03 AM   #16 
           - No. Actually, I didn't forget about it.  cali   Dec-12-07 08:17 AM   #9 
           - This is what it has to do with this OP of which you made this stmt:  EV_Ares   Dec-12-07 08:23 AM   #11 
              - that's absurd. his polling has nothing to do with the fact  cali   Dec-12-07 08:30 AM   #12 
                 - Your opinion! It is a reason that shows he could be the best candidate  EV_Ares   Dec-12-07 08:31 AM   #13 
           - Which would be great if the general election were next week  karynnj   Dec-12-07 08:58 AM   #15 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC