Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Reply #7: "purity"? You mean like the endless bullshit calls to throw gays, pro-choicers, atheists, etc under [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Sun Nov-25-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. "purity"? You mean like the endless bullshit calls to throw gays, pro-choicers, atheists, etc under
Edited on Sun Nov-25-07 06:35 PM by impeachdubya
the bus, like after the 2004 election?

Remember? How about that endless stream of deeply "concerned" threads expressing heartfelt "concern" that, you know, by being so intransigent on issues like reproductive freedom or full equality for our GLBT citizens, we were (and are still, presumably) "alienating the values voter"...?

Oh, yes, the all powerful values voter. We must cower in fear of the all-powerful values voter, because the media tells us that the all-powerful values voter is all powerful, and the media never lies, right?

Never mind the fact that the MAJORITY OF AMERICANS ARE PRO-CHOICE, for instance.

Wait- What was that? The Majority of Americans are pro-choice? How can that be? After all, the media constantly tells us what a "loser issue" standing up for the rights of women to control their own bodies is...

Funny, I seem to remember a brisk April day in 2004, standing with 1.2 Million Other Americans on the Mall in DC, in the LARGEST PEACEABLE ASSEMBLY IN U.S. History- marching for reproductive choice. And what did the media do in response to such a tectonic event? Well, CNN spent the day at a racetrack chasing down elusively drunk "NASCAR Voters" who were inevitably pro-Bush... that is, when they weren't talking about Estee Lauder's very important death.

One could be forgiven for not knowing that THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS ARE PRO CHOICE, just like one could be forgiven for not knowing that large numbers of Americans protested the Iraq War before it started- the media doesn't want to remind you.

Meanwhile, the GOP plunges ahead with an agenda of outlawing not just abortion, but most forms of birth control as well... Clearly, they are in tune with where the great heartland stands on these issues.. right? :eyes:

Yes. The values voter truly is all-powerful. That's why Terri Schiavo was such a stunning success story for the GOP.

Here's my definition of "purity", Will- and I know it's really, really unreasonable-

I don't care if People, or even my fellow Democrats believe with their heart of hearts that life begins at the second of conception, that a fertilized human egg is the EXACT SAME THING as a "baby", or that the birth control pill is little concentrated nuggets of dehydrated Satan. My "purity" issue comes in when people start trying to pass LAWS imposing the same on the rest of us. You can be as Catholic as you want, but The Pope's place is in the Vatican under a giant hat, or in the Popemobile- not my wife's Uterus.

Likewise, I try to understand if people aren't "comfortable" with Gay Marriage. That's why I'm extremely glad our Democratic Leadership dropped all those bills attempting to force non-gay social conservatives to BE Gay or HAVE gay weddings of their own...

...cough...

...Nevertheless, the idea that two gay people getting married has some kind of magical spooky-action-at-a-distance quantum effect on social conservatives who have never met them to the point where those social conservatives NEED to limit the marriage rights OF those gay citizens, I call bullshit.

Don't like Gay Marriage? Don't have one.

And lastly- and I realize I'm flirting with charges of "intolerance" or "bigotry", here- if someone wants to believe that the Earth is 6,000 years old, or Dinosaurs were on "Noah's Ark" (standard disclaimer: yes, I realize these are fringe positions NOT representative of most "Christians" or most theists, TYVM) if someone genuinely wants to believe those things, no one will stop them. But if they want to peddle those things as "science" or try to float unsubstantiated bullshit in a public school science curriculum, then Houston, we have a problem. If standing up strongly for the proposition of separation of church and state means I risk "alienating the (dreaded) values voter", then I guess I'm alienating the values voter, Sparky.

But I'm willing to compromise- I promise not to march into anyone's church and demand the right to start teaching Darwin there.

What can I say? I'm a Purity Nazi.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  "We need purity in the party" WilliamPitt  Nov-25-07 12:54 PM   #0 
   Purity in the party? Who said that, anyway?  Fridays Child   Nov-25-07 12:57 PM   #1 
   I'd prefer to see a quote as well...  Cooley Hurd   Nov-25-07 06:40 PM   #10 
      That quote was prompted by this thread:  Bryan   Nov-25-07 10:12 PM   #22 
   Ok, so maybe I'm a friggin' idiot  Bluzmann57   Nov-25-07 01:05 PM   #2 
   hell, we've already run off the privatizers.  ulysses   Nov-25-07 01:06 PM   #3 
   A number of people don't get this  KingFlorez   Nov-25-07 01:16 PM   #4 
   Afriend of mine says that concepts of group "purity" always lead to a death camp.  SharonAnn   Nov-25-07 05:26 PM   #5 
   Party Loyalists and Yellow Dogs aren't "purists"?  Tierra_y_Libertad   Nov-25-07 05:30 PM   #6 
   "purity"? You mean like the endless bullshit calls to throw gays, pro-choicers, atheists, etc under  impeachdubya   Nov-25-07 06:11 PM   #7 
   You, impeachdubya,  rateyes   Nov-25-07 07:34 PM   #13 
   I second rateyes' motion. Play it again, Sam, only louder and out...  puebloknot   Nov-25-07 08:49 PM   #19 
   Kicked and recommended. NT  TheWraith   Nov-25-07 06:19 PM   #8 
   Backbone is the right word.  sarcasmo   Nov-25-07 06:32 PM   #9 
   thanks for this, will.  cali   Nov-25-07 06:48 PM   #11 
   You are assuming all Catholics believe the same way on social issues...  Solon   Nov-25-07 06:51 PM   #12 
   Hell, why have a Democratic party?  Chulanowa   Nov-25-07 07:45 PM   #14 
   Please explain your definition of party purity, Will.  Joe Fields   Nov-25-07 08:02 PM   #15 
   When the CEOs and Wall St Bankers ....  bvar22   Nov-25-07 08:23 PM   #16 
   Are we confusing purity with cohesiveness?  gratuitous   Nov-25-07 08:31 PM   #17 
   Unions are socialist paradigm organizations. Folks need to unlearn the propaganda from  upi402   Nov-25-07 08:37 PM   #18 
   I sometimes wonder whether people are allowed to smoke in that "big tent."  TahitiNut   Nov-25-07 08:59 PM   #20 
   Shame! You are thinking outside the box..er..tent.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Nov-25-07 09:07 PM   #21 
   Moral purity can kiss my entire big fat ass.  davsand   Nov-25-07 10:47 PM   #23 
   Well that brings up the question of who gets to decide what purity is.  JVS   Nov-25-07 11:04 PM   #24 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC