You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #81: Thank you for your concern about sexist ads [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
81. Thank you for your concern about sexist ads
Now that you have shown yourself interested in this issue, may I point you to some ads that actually do offend women? I am sure you'd want your energy directed toward alerting folks to an ad campaign that actually does insult women, as opposed to this one, which does not.

First, some background. http://www.medialit.org/reading_room/article41.html

# 1 Superiority.
Three common tactics used to establish superiority are size, attention and positioning. Notice how both men and women in the Hanes ad appear subservient because of their positions below and behind their partners. The Gable Film Festival poster lends historical reference to the stereotype that women, like the one in back, fawn over men yet cannot hold their attention.

# 2 Dismemberment.
Women's bodies are often dismembered and treated as separate parts, perpetuating the concept that a woman's body is not connected to her mind and emotions. The hidden message: If a woman has great legs, who cares who she is?

# 3 Clowning.
Shown alone in ads, men are often portrayed as secure, powerful and serious. By contrast, women are pictured as playful clowns, perpetuating the attitude that women are childish and cannot be taken seriously.

# 4 Canting.
People in control of their lives stand upright, alert and ready to meet the world. In contrast, the bending of body parts conveys unpreparedness, submissiveness and appeasement. The Capri ad further exemplifies head and body canting. The woman appears off-balance, insecure and weak. Her upraised hand in front of her face also conveys shame and embarrassment.

# 5 Dominance/Violence. The tragic abuse-affection cycle that many women are trapped in is too often glorified in advertising. Is the Revlon ad selling lipstick and nail polish or the idea that a woman must be kept under control? Note the woman's affectionate reward for her pleasant cooperation in being choked with her own pearls. It's not funny, Frank.


Also take a look here: http://www.jointhemediacircus.co.uk/mediacircus/2007/10... for examples of ads which actually do offend feminists. You might want to check out http://www.umich.edu/~sapac/sia/2007 / too.

Again, as a feminist, I thank you for your concern but I assure you, in this instance, it is misplaced. The image you are worried about shows a woman pretty well covered, and in an assertive pose (in fact, if you clicked through to he site, you'd see that she's pretty much in charge). She isn't poised to serve a man, she isn't shown as ready to strip off her clothes, and she isn't emaciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC