LeftyMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-23-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Oh, not this shit again. |
| -Can we please get rid of the nasty, sexist, rational responders ad |
dsc |
Nov-23-07 10:32 AM |
#0 |
 -
Oh, not this shit again. |
LeftyMom |
Nov-23-07 10:38 AM |
#1 |
 -
Can I have some of that popcorn you're holding under your burka? |
TahitiNut |
Nov-23-07 01:49 PM |
#63 |
 -
You left out the graphic. |
impeachdubya |
Nov-24-07 12:51 AM |
#94 |
| -
What's the problem? |
cosmik debris |
Nov-23-07 10:40 AM |
#2 |
| -
These are the ads at the bottom of a thread |
dsc |
Nov-23-07 10:42 AM |
#3 |
| -
Get Firefox. nt |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-23-07 10:44 AM |
#5 |
| -
So your only problem is the way the cop is dressed? |
cosmik debris |
Nov-23-07 10:57 AM |
#19 |
| -
context matters |
dsc |
Nov-23-07 11:03 AM |
#23 |
| -
I don't see any ads at the bottom of threads on my screen |
proud2Blib |
Nov-23-07 11:26 AM |
#40 |
| -
Hey! I don't see her! |
DutchLiberal |
Nov-23-07 12:22 PM |
#54 |
| -
I have ads disabled, so I turned them on to see. It isn't "nasty," |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-23-07 10:44 AM |
#4 |
| -
If I want to see strippers I will go to a strip joint |
dsc |
Nov-23-07 10:45 AM |
#6 |
| -
Are you kidding? |
blogslut |
Nov-23-07 10:48 AM |
#9 |
| -
I wouldn't equate it to porn |
dsc |
Nov-23-07 10:50 AM |
#10 |
| -
Why? |
blogslut |
Nov-23-07 10:55 AM |
#16 |
| -
I can't even see the ad, and I don't have "ads" turned off. |
Sugar Smack |
Nov-23-07 10:51 AM |
#11 |
| -
The ads shows up randomly at the bottom of a page, |
blogslut |
Nov-23-07 10:53 AM |
#13 |
| -
In other words, the OP is going out of their way to be offended. |
Kingshakabobo |
Nov-23-07 11:24 AM |
#36 |
| -
Here you go |
blogslut |
Nov-23-07 11:33 AM |
#42 |
| -
That's it? |
Kingshakabobo |
Nov-23-07 11:36 AM |
#43 |
| -
The OP couldn't be giving them more potential new members |
blogslut |
Nov-23-07 11:40 AM |
#46 |
| -
Uhm... She's practically dressed like a nun... |
DutchLiberal |
Nov-23-07 12:29 PM |
#56 |
| -
I don't think the problem is a woman in a satin tank top. |
lwfern |
Nov-23-07 10:54 AM |
#14 |
| -
Ahh, I see |
blogslut |
Nov-23-07 10:57 AM |
#18 |
| -
Nice try, but no. |
lwfern |
Nov-23-07 11:09 AM |
#28 |
| -
thank you you sexplained it better than I |
dsc |
Nov-23-07 11:10 AM |
#30 |
| -
I'm just waiting for someone to claim |
lwfern |
Nov-23-07 11:15 AM |
#35 |
| -
You have a problem with atheists? Please elaborate. -nt |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Nov-23-07 07:53 PM |
#79 |
| -
Ha, no. |
lwfern |
Nov-23-07 08:07 PM |
#84 |
| -
You mean the woman, instead of dressing up like an actual cop, |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-23-07 11:12 AM |
#32 |
| -
How adorable |
blogslut |
Nov-23-07 11:14 AM |
#34 |
| -
Stripper? |
SyntaxError |
Nov-23-07 08:06 PM |
#83 |
| -
So? |
quantessd |
Nov-23-07 12:28 PM |
#55 |
| -
You very utterance of the phrase "satin tank top" has distracted me. |
Bucky |
Nov-23-07 01:40 PM |
#62 |
| -
The cop thing is their site gimmick. |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-23-07 10:52 AM |
#12 |
| -
I belong to a Rational Response Squad... |
IMModerate |
Nov-23-07 07:29 PM |
#74 |
| -
Well... I've been in plenty of late night, cheap, Pakistani owned mini-marts in my life... |
D__S |
Nov-24-07 01:10 AM |
#95 |
| -
Why don't you explain your problem with the ad. because I don't get it. |
aikoaiko |
Nov-23-07 10:46 AM |
#7 |
| -
Click often. |
rucky |
Nov-23-07 10:47 AM |
#8 |
| -
Really? I didn't know that was how it worked. I'll click often -- and pay more attention -- |
gateley |
Nov-23-07 07:46 PM |
#77 |
| -
I think someone is trying to misapply the term "sexist" ... |
JackRiddler |
Nov-23-07 10:55 AM |
#15 |
| -
Agreed. |
LeftyMom |
Nov-23-07 10:56 AM |
#17 |
| -
tell us the REAL reason you want to keep the rest of us from |
jonnyblitz |
Nov-23-07 10:57 AM |
#20 |
| -
I haven't complained about any other athiest ads |
dsc |
Nov-23-07 11:05 AM |
#24 |
| -
I think in order for something to be "offensive," it has to offend |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-23-07 11:05 AM |
#25 |
| -
I personally don't find the human body offensive. |
jonnyblitz |
Nov-23-07 11:26 AM |
#39 |
| -
In all sincerity, I'm sorry it offends you. But honestly, I never even noticed |
gateley |
Nov-23-07 07:49 PM |
#78 |
| -
I clicked on the link, too. |
Sugar Smack |
Nov-23-07 11:11 AM |
#31 |
| -
Why is it nasty or sexist? |
ozone_man |
Nov-23-07 10:59 AM |
#21 |
| -
Best I can figure, it's because there is a woman in it. |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-23-07 11:01 AM |
#22 |
| -
It is because the woman is barely clothed |
dsc |
Nov-23-07 11:09 AM |
#29 |
| -
To the repressed, perhaps. |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-23-07 11:13 AM |
#33 |
| -
"Barely clothed"?? She's practically dressed like a nun! |
DutchLiberal |
Nov-23-07 12:37 PM |
#58 |
| -
Some paintings of Christ on the cross portray him as shirtless. |
Boojatta |
Nov-23-07 07:16 PM |
#70 |
| -
Oh noes, teh opressed religionists are being opressed by teh Evil Atheist Conspiracy!!!1!!11! |
Odin2005 |
Nov-23-07 11:06 AM |
#26 |
| -
It worse than that. The Atheists have a woman with large breasts on their side. |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-23-07 11:08 AM |
#27 |
| -
If this is the ad, I don't see anything nasty, sexist, or trashy. |
aikoaiko |
Nov-23-07 11:24 AM |
#37 |
| -
I think so. |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-23-07 11:26 AM |
#38 |
| -
yeah, I can see where "we can fix that" would rub a believer |
jonnyblitz |
Nov-23-07 11:31 AM |
#41 |
| -
It's the same mentality that "fixes" gay people. |
spoony |
Nov-23-07 11:40 AM |
#47 |
| -
That comparison is not apt. |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-23-07 11:41 AM |
#48 |
| -
I said the mentality is the same, not the objects. |
spoony |
Nov-23-07 11:45 AM |
#50 |
| -
That is like suggesting that an auto mechanic and a gay converter have similar mentalities. |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-23-07 06:44 PM |
#64 |
| -
"When pressed, be thickheaded... |
spoony |
Nov-23-07 06:58 PM |
#68 |
| -
I'm serious. Your comparison is simply bogus. |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-23-07 07:00 PM |
#69 |
| -
fighting BS is the same mentality as McCloset & Co.? RIIIIIGHT... |
Odin2005 |
Nov-23-07 12:02 PM |
#52 |
| -
Allow me to proselytise a moment for the cause of reading comprehension. |
spoony |
Nov-23-07 12:29 PM |
#57 |
| -
*shrug* I believe rapists and sex offenders aren't okay the way they are. |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-23-07 06:46 PM |
#65 |
| -
You obviously don't get the distinction between beliefs (religion) and biological urges (being gay). |
Odin2005 |
Nov-24-07 12:24 AM |
#90 |
| -
I'll have to remember this the next time someone here |
spoony |
Nov-23-07 11:39 AM |
#44 |
| -
......... |
Evoman |
Nov-23-07 01:20 PM |
#61 |
| -
How about this- Next time a busty, scantily clad Christian blonde who looks like this |
impeachdubya |
Nov-24-07 01:47 AM |
#96 |
| -
What's the big deal? |
Le Taz Hot |
Nov-23-07 11:39 AM |
#45 |
| -
Not just NO, but HELL NO!!! |
qdemn7 |
Nov-23-07 11:43 AM |
#49 |
| -
I find the fact that you're taking offense at this ad rather odd |
MadHound |
Nov-23-07 12:01 PM |
#51 |
| -
Strangely. it's actually selling |
dmallind |
Nov-23-07 12:17 PM |
#53 |
| -
I think the chick in the ad is hot! |
iamahaingttta |
Nov-23-07 12:47 PM |
#59 |
| -
You have characterized the ad as "nasty" and "sexist". |
SimpleTrend |
Nov-23-07 12:49 PM |
#60 |
| -
I've had a long term search ongoing to find an online essay I read years ago |
SimpleTrend |
Nov-23-07 11:21 PM |
#89 |
| -
Oh no! Not a breast! |
lynyrd_skynyrd |
Nov-23-07 06:49 PM |
#66 |
| -
I don't see ads - I use Firefox with the Adblock extension |
nonconformist |
Nov-23-07 06:53 PM |
#67 |
| -
. |
IMModerate |
Nov-23-07 07:17 PM |
#71 |
| -
DU has no control over the Google ads... |
Cooley Hurd |
Nov-23-07 07:25 PM |
#72 |
| -
Not exactly. |
spoony |
Nov-23-07 07:28 PM |
#73 |
| -
Okay... so they have a little control... |
Cooley Hurd |
Nov-23-07 07:35 PM |
#75 |
| -
No, it isn't against "theocracy" |
spoony |
Nov-23-07 07:40 PM |
#76 |
| -
Yes, the site is promoting atheism because THEISM has infiltrated our secular govt... |
Cooley Hurd |
Nov-23-07 07:58 PM |
#80 |
| -
Thank you for your concern about sexist ads |
Book Lover |
Nov-23-07 08:00 PM |
#81 |
| -
What about those ads of the shirtless buff guys, can we get rid of those, too? |
Drunken Irishman |
Nov-23-07 08:04 PM |
#82 |
| -
It's the ugly picture of shrub, with Condi drooling in the background, |
DLnyc |
Nov-23-07 09:16 PM |
#85 |
| -
DU has been quite prudish as of late |
nonconformist |
Nov-23-07 10:39 PM |
#86 |
| -
What's the problem here? |
cgrindley |
Nov-23-07 10:51 PM |
#87 |
| -
I agree that hillary |
Froward69 |
Nov-23-07 11:06 PM |
#88 |
| -
Smell The Glove. |
D__S |
Nov-24-07 12:31 AM |
#91 |
| -
If people keep complaining about it, I'm going to have to turn the ads back on. |
impeachdubya |
Nov-24-07 12:48 AM |
#92 |
| -
How dare that jezebel expose her arms and top third of her breasts! |
MilesColtrane |
Nov-24-07 12:51 AM |
#93 |
| -
Thanks for your effort. Insulting anyone's spiritual beliefs does not belong on DU. |
Fly by night |
Nov-24-07 10:52 AM |
#97 |
| -
dsc, using attractive women to attract attention to atheism is the progressive thing to do |
cuke |
Nov-24-07 11:39 AM |
#98 |
| -
"When Will They Ever Learn?"--Another Day, Another Attack of Male Hate |
Hidden Stillness |
Nov-24-07 12:15 PM |
#99 |
| -
So are you against the ad or for the ad? |
JVS |
Nov-24-07 12:19 PM |
#100 |
| -
She should wear a Burka! Then she'd be a respectable lady! |
Beelzebud |
Nov-24-07 12:25 PM |
#101 |
| -
Beloved dsc, my most excellent Christian brother... |
JVS |
Nov-24-07 12:56 PM |
#102 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
