|
Edited on Wed Nov-21-07 12:44 PM by Bleachers7
Those are limited when considering the breadth of potential gun rights issues. The platform names two very specific agenda items. There's nothing about rights, qualified ownership, registration, safety, etc. That's not a coincidence.
|
| -It should be clear that gun control is a big fat loser for dems |
cali |
Nov-21-07 09:23 AM |
#0 |
 -
don't worry, the supreme court will put a gun under everyone's pillow. |
spanone |
Nov-21-07 09:25 AM |
#1 |
 -
I agree... |
Virginia Dare |
Nov-21-07 09:50 AM |
#7 |
 -
Exactly. No way did this far-RW court take this case to uphold gun control -- |
stranger81 |
Nov-21-07 12:02 PM |
#54 |
| -
That makes as much sense as... |
krispos42 |
Nov-21-07 02:45 PM |
#118 |
| -
Not really: restrictions on both full-autos and CCW permits are probably constitutional (nt) |
SteveM |
Nov-21-07 04:41 PM |
#137 |
| -
There are plenty of right-wing gun control proponents |
dmesg |
Nov-21-07 10:25 PM |
#189 |
| -
and you make that sound like a bad thing |
LibertarianAtheist |
Nov-22-07 09:52 PM |
#231 |
| -
it is a bad thing. |
spanone |
Nov-23-07 08:03 AM |
#234 |
| -
care to explain your point further? |
LibertarianAtheist |
Nov-23-07 05:32 PM |
#240 |
| -
One point I would make - not towards prevention of ownership |
derby378 |
Nov-23-07 05:48 PM |
#241 |
| -
Ironically, if SCOTUS rules against DC, then it will end up helping us |
Aya Reiko |
Nov-23-07 02:23 PM |
#236 |
| -
How is rescinding a ban on guns in the home putting a gun "under everyone's pillow"? |
Alexander |
Nov-21-07 02:02 PM |
#100 |
| -
The 2nd Amendment does not require you to have one. |
madeline_con |
Nov-21-07 11:16 PM |
#200 |
| -
Don't know how much help it will be but my vote in the primary steers us away from it |
RGBolen |
Nov-21-07 09:25 AM |
#2 |
| -
that is for sure. but majority of dems never promoted that. was NRA |
seabeyond |
Nov-21-07 09:26 AM |
#3 |
| -
That's true to an extent, but |
NeedleCast |
Nov-21-07 09:32 AM |
#4 |
| -
yes... i cringe when he does that knowing he will never be elected, yet |
seabeyond |
Nov-21-07 10:52 AM |
#28 |
| -
It was the slipperly slope argument |
krispos42 |
Nov-21-07 02:48 PM |
#119 |
| -
I agree 100%. |
Wiregrass Willie |
Nov-21-07 09:37 AM |
#5 |
| -
It doesn't matter whether the Dems make it an issue or not.. |
Virginia Dare |
Nov-21-07 09:49 AM |
#6 |
| -
Not for this Democrat |
frazzled |
Nov-21-07 10:10 AM |
#8 |
| -
While I sympathize with your plight, seeing as you're from Chicago... |
derby378 |
Nov-21-07 10:18 AM |
#12 |
| -
Local laws will never be effective when you can get a cheap gun next door ... |
frazzled |
Nov-21-07 10:24 AM |
#15 |
| -
Gun ownership is also heavily restricted nationwide in Mexico, Brazil and Russia. |
BadgerLaw2010 |
Nov-21-07 10:28 AM |
#17 |
| -
Bullshit. It does work.. |
Xenotime |
Nov-21-07 12:39 PM |
#66 |
| -
And that proves what, exactly? |
EstimatedProphet |
Nov-21-07 01:34 PM |
#92 |
| -
And the US has free gun ownership, and much less violence than those restricted countries above. |
BadgerLaw2010 |
Nov-21-07 02:15 PM |
#108 |
| -
yes, |
FORREST GRUMP |
Nov-21-07 06:33 PM |
#157 |
| -
Guns didn't murder them. People did. |
madeline_con |
Nov-21-07 11:19 PM |
#201 |
| -
Maybe it would be easier if you would stop BEING on the wrong side of the issue. |
karlrschneider |
Nov-21-07 10:33 AM |
#19 |
| -
Nothing will ever convince me I am wrong on this issue |
frazzled |
Nov-21-07 10:54 AM |
#29 |
| -
perfect example of the subject at hand |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 11:34 AM |
#42 |
| -
Nothing will convince you including facts |
bamalib |
Nov-21-07 11:42 AM |
#47 |
| -
Really? |
EstimatedProphet |
Nov-21-07 01:37 PM |
#95 |
| -
Fine, you might also consider that very many Democrats embrace their 2nd Amendment rights |
karlrschneider |
Nov-21-07 03:38 PM |
#131 |
| -
"convincing argument"? You said "Nothing will ever convince me I am wrong." |
SteveM |
Nov-21-07 04:58 PM |
#139 |
| -
You spoke the same words I feel. |
mvccd1000 |
Nov-21-07 10:53 PM |
#197 |
| -
So, regulating firearm ownership will hinder |
madeline_con |
Nov-21-07 11:24 PM |
#202 |
| -
Outlaw all motor vehicles. It will be worth it if it saves just one |
2rth2pwr |
Nov-24-07 03:40 PM |
#246 |
| -
Through the mail? |
WGS |
Nov-21-07 11:46 AM |
#48 |
| -
The mail is full of guns. |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 11:52 AM |
#49 |
| -
Yes, but the poster made it sound like someone could just go online |
Ghost in the Machine |
Nov-21-07 07:47 PM |
#169 |
| -
Licensed collectors can get curio and relic firearms through the mail too |
slackmaster |
Nov-21-07 01:16 PM |
#80 |
| -
gotta love those Nagants! |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 01:25 PM |
#87 |
| -
And Mausers, Lee-Enfields, Swiss K-31s, M1 Garands... |
slackmaster |
Nov-21-07 01:27 PM |
#89 |
| -
uncle! uncle!!! |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 02:01 PM |
#99 |
| -
Mail-order guns for the general public ended in 1968 with the Gun Control Act |
slackmaster |
Nov-21-07 01:15 PM |
#79 |
| -
actually... |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 01:23 PM |
#85 |
| -
True, but the FFL has responsibility over the gun while in posession |
EstimatedProphet |
Nov-21-07 01:40 PM |
#97 |
| -
I call bullshit. |
beevul |
Nov-21-07 10:22 PM |
#188 |
| -
You mean the neighboring jurisdictions with LOWER CRIME RATES? |
dmesg |
Nov-21-07 10:32 PM |
#192 |
| -
Chicago has the toughest gun laws in the nation after DC. Lot of good it does. |
BadgerLaw2010 |
Nov-21-07 10:25 AM |
#16 |
| -
Look, I'm not saying that communities shouldn't |
cali |
Nov-21-07 10:19 AM |
#13 |
| -
It really supports your argument |
michreject |
Nov-21-07 11:29 AM |
#38 |
| -
Keep an open mind, somebody has to. |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 11:39 AM |
#43 |
| -
Judging from D.C.'s crime data, crims there are already "armed to the teeth." |
SteveM |
Nov-21-07 04:54 PM |
#138 |
| -
Chicago already bans all handguns. |
Nabeshin |
Nov-21-07 06:53 PM |
#161 |
| -
Ending the Drug War isn't the answer either |
Aya Reiko |
Nov-23-07 02:31 PM |
#237 |
| -
Is there any major fire-arm legislation planned |
LanternWaste |
Nov-21-07 10:12 AM |
#9 |
| -
yes, the motherlode |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 11:12 AM |
#34 |
| -
Ha Ha this Congress is worthless |
wuushew |
Nov-21-07 11:17 AM |
#35 |
| -
Never underestimate a fool. |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 12:00 PM |
#52 |
| -
HR1022 would cost me personally thousands of dollars |
slackmaster |
Nov-21-07 01:19 PM |
#82 |
| -
Also HR1167 (by Cong. McCarthy, D-NY): the "No fly, no buy" bill... |
SteveM |
Nov-21-07 05:12 PM |
#142 |
| -
In your dreams, Cali! Americans everywhere know their only hope |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Nov-21-07 10:15 AM |
#10 |
| -
what the fuck are you taliking about? |
cali |
Nov-21-07 10:21 AM |
#14 |
| -
How can you be progressive and hunt? They don't go together. |
Xenotime |
Nov-21-07 12:42 PM |
#70 |
| -
Why not? |
slackmaster |
Nov-21-07 01:20 PM |
#83 |
| -
How can you be an environmentalist and not be concerned about animal overpopulation? |
EstimatedProphet |
Nov-21-07 01:42 PM |
#98 |
| -
I don't know where you live, but yes where I live |
cali |
Nov-21-07 02:02 PM |
#101 |
| -
I think the issue is handguns, not rifles and shotguns. |
CTyankee |
Nov-21-07 02:39 PM |
#115 |
| -
Umm...H.R.1022 would ban the most popular rifles in America. |
benEzra |
Nov-21-07 02:56 PM |
#123 |
| -
Really? Where are your armored tanks? Firepower to match that of the United States Army? |
CTyankee |
Nov-21-07 03:29 PM |
#126 |
| -
Thoughts... |
benEzra |
Nov-21-07 04:10 PM |
#134 |
| -
I am glad your life was saved. It is not to your detriment, tho, to point to |
CTyankee |
Nov-21-07 04:59 PM |
#140 |
| -
They're in the same place Iraqi insurgents keep them, right? |
SteveM |
Nov-21-07 05:20 PM |
#144 |
| -
Yes, and I am so glad you brought this into the argument! |
CTyankee |
Nov-21-07 06:04 PM |
#151 |
| -
so........we all get a free AK? |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 06:10 PM |
#152 |
| -
I hope I can help and am sorry I am so dense. |
CTyankee |
Nov-21-07 06:18 PM |
#154 |
| -
yeah, pretty much. |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 07:00 PM |
#163 |
| -
No, my bad. I should not have written "losing insurgency." Ugh. |
CTyankee |
Nov-21-07 07:31 PM |
#166 |
| -
How would the US military deal with hit and run insurgents? |
Nabeshin |
Nov-21-07 07:42 PM |
#168 |
| -
Are we talking about a rational government here? |
CTyankee |
Nov-21-07 08:09 PM |
#172 |
| -
I'm still confused |
dmesg |
Nov-21-07 10:40 PM |
#194 |
| -
But I was talking about our own government vs. our own population. |
CTyankee |
Nov-22-07 07:20 AM |
#210 |
| -
Actually, I want a Thompson |
EstimatedProphet |
Nov-22-07 01:26 PM |
#223 |
| -
you don't want much do you |
Tejas |
Nov-22-07 04:26 PM |
#229 |
| -
And a reloader. Yeah. A Thompson and a reloader. |
EstimatedProphet |
Nov-22-07 05:10 PM |
#230 |
| -
own private militias will prevail in such a conflict? |
FORREST GRUMP |
Nov-21-07 06:51 PM |
#160 |
| -
Well, let's look at them case by case. |
CTyankee |
Nov-21-07 07:48 PM |
#170 |
| -
Yes, of course it would,'t work here. |
FORREST GRUMP |
Nov-21-07 08:42 PM |
#174 |
| -
Private militias |
dmesg |
Nov-21-07 10:36 PM |
#193 |
| -
Yes, worked fine in getting us out of Vietnam and will eventually in Iraq. |
CTyankee |
Nov-22-07 07:26 AM |
#211 |
| -
The foreignness, inexplicably, seems to matter a lot to you... |
dmesg |
Nov-22-07 11:36 AM |
#219 |
| -
Have you seen what a group of guys with improvised |
madeline_con |
Nov-21-07 11:28 PM |
#203 |
| -
You make the RPG's in your garage, along with the IED's |
dmesg |
Nov-21-07 11:42 PM |
#205 |
| -
Then, we'll have everything we need for the revolution. n/t |
madeline_con |
Nov-21-07 11:48 PM |
#206 |
| -
where would the UN stand on this? n/t |
Tejas |
Nov-22-07 04:24 PM |
#228 |
| -
You don't need Armored tanks to overthrow a Government. |
MiltonF |
Nov-22-07 10:21 AM |
#218 |
| -
Good luck ever winning an election without the Midwest states. |
BadgerLaw2010 |
Nov-21-07 02:17 PM |
#110 |
| -
Wow. Thanks for letting me know I'm not progressive, Xenotime! |
dmesg |
Nov-21-07 09:00 PM |
#175 |
| -
how do you figure? |
fishwax |
Nov-21-07 10:57 PM |
#198 |
| -
what makes you think that progressives don't eat meat? |
QuestionAll |
Nov-22-07 07:36 AM |
#212 |
| -
cali, I ran the post through the Babelfish translator. |
DuStrange |
Nov-21-07 02:27 PM |
#112 |
| -
Here too! I just got a deer and hope for another this weekend. |
SteveM |
Nov-21-07 05:16 PM |
#143 |
| -
That's unfair. |
barb162 |
Nov-21-07 10:27 PM |
#190 |
| -
Yes, they should. |
mainegreen |
Nov-21-07 10:17 AM |
#11 |
| -
You understand that this could be a case of one sided politics? |
wuushew |
Nov-21-07 10:28 AM |
#18 |
| -
DC didn't regulate handguns, they banned them. nt |
mvccd1000 |
Nov-21-07 10:34 AM |
#20 |
| -
So did Virginia Tech. |
karlrschneider |
Nov-21-07 10:36 AM |
#21 |
| -
Good luck with that statehood thing .. |
JustABozoOnThisBus |
Nov-21-07 10:39 AM |
#22 |
| -
I wish there were a "Democracy for DC" topic board... |
dmesg |
Nov-21-07 10:45 PM |
#195 |
| -
One job of the SCOTUS... |
beevul |
Nov-21-07 02:11 PM |
#105 |
| -
And both plaintiff and defendent petioned the court to hear the case. |
D__S |
Nov-21-07 03:50 PM |
#133 |
| -
can we win without the anti-gun nuts? |
mdmc |
Nov-21-07 10:39 AM |
#23 |
| -
It would be very hard without Ohio |
wuushew |
Nov-21-07 10:41 AM |
#25 |
| -
It's because there is no reasoned debate on the issue. |
mmonk |
Nov-21-07 10:40 AM |
#24 |
| -
As much of a gun-control advocate as I am, I've got to agree - it's a loser of a political issue. |
marmar |
Nov-21-07 10:43 AM |
#26 |
| -
Not for me! |
Beausoir |
Nov-21-07 10:47 AM |
#27 |
| -
Why do you say this? Have the Dem's been obsessing about gun control lately? Or... |
devilgrrl |
Nov-21-07 10:54 AM |
#30 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-21-07 11:06 AM |
#32 |
| -
Oooh ouch! Don't hurt me like that! |
devilgrrl |
Nov-21-07 11:42 AM |
#45 |
| -
If Dems were not "obsessing," then why this massive response? |
SteveM |
Nov-21-07 05:36 PM |
#148 |
| -
Why the massive response? Because it's flamebait... |
devilgrrl |
Nov-22-07 02:44 PM |
#224 |
| -
It's clear that the reslugs |
zidzi |
Nov-21-07 10:55 AM |
#31 |
| -
Brady analogies hurt us too. |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 11:25 AM |
#36 |
| -
Oh really? Well, I say Biden |
zidzi |
Nov-21-07 11:32 AM |
#40 |
| -
Not sure I understand... |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 11:42 AM |
#46 |
| -
Then we're on |
zidzi |
Nov-21-07 12:02 PM |
#53 |
| -
WOW.... |
virginia mountainman |
Nov-21-07 05:23 PM |
#145 |
| -
power...... |
loyalsister |
Nov-21-07 08:26 PM |
#173 |
| -
And "assault weapons" are neither |
dmesg |
Nov-21-07 09:08 PM |
#177 |
| -
Assault weapons |
Thothmes |
Nov-23-07 07:59 AM |
#233 |
| -
No no no no no no no no no no no! |
dmesg |
Nov-23-07 02:08 PM |
#235 |
| -
You still don't get it... |
virginia mountainman |
Nov-21-07 10:17 PM |
#187 |
| -
Sorry |
loyalsister |
Nov-23-07 06:19 PM |
#242 |
| -
So do swimming pools, but you don't want to ban them... |
virginia mountainman |
Nov-23-07 10:10 PM |
#244 |
| -
Gun porno... |
loyalsister |
Nov-24-07 03:27 PM |
#245 |
| -
I see... |
virginia mountainman |
Nov-24-07 11:19 PM |
#249 |
| -
I think you've been spun... |
benEzra |
Nov-22-07 01:02 PM |
#221 |
| -
yeah yeah yeah |
loyalsister |
Nov-23-07 06:43 PM |
#243 |
| -
I wrote..."killers on the |
zidzi |
Nov-21-07 11:12 PM |
#199 |
| -
Hunting is by no means a guaranteed right. Gun ownership is. |
dmesg |
Nov-21-07 09:07 PM |
#176 |
| -
If it were up to me, I'd ban handguns. But I know it isn't up to me, so |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-21-07 11:11 AM |
#33 |
| -
I'd rather ban criminals. |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 11:29 AM |
#39 |
| -
If we outlaw crimes, only criminals will commit them! |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-21-07 11:32 AM |
#41 |
| -
great thread for the GUNS forum |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 11:28 AM |
#37 |
| -
The hard-core gun nuts still now and forever will believe the Dems are gun grabbers |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Nov-21-07 11:41 AM |
#44 |
| -
Perhaps |
WGS |
Nov-21-07 12:39 PM |
#67 |
| -
You're jumping to conclusions |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Nov-21-07 01:37 PM |
#94 |
| -
clarification? |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 02:05 PM |
#102 |
| -
As I said |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Nov-21-07 02:25 PM |
#111 |
| -
shoot! |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 02:40 PM |
#116 |
| -
I'm really about responsible gun ownership |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Nov-21-07 03:31 PM |
#127 |
| -
I know so well. My neice, age 24 and recently married, was killed by a handgun wielded by her |
CTyankee |
Nov-21-07 02:48 PM |
#120 |
| -
That's heartbreaking. |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Nov-21-07 03:36 PM |
#130 |
| -
Unfortunately, there was nothing to stop him, so she died. n/t |
CTyankee |
Nov-21-07 03:47 PM |
#132 |
| -
There you go again, using that term. |
WGS |
Nov-21-07 02:16 PM |
#109 |
| -
LOL! |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Nov-21-07 02:27 PM |
#113 |
| -
All wedge issues should be avoided |
OzarkDem |
Nov-21-07 11:54 AM |
#50 |
| -
That's right, stick to repug talking points. Nothing controversial. |
stranger81 |
Nov-21-07 12:00 PM |
#51 |
| -
Confucius say: cut off nose make glasses fall down. |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 12:15 PM |
#55 |
| -
This isn't 1994. |
stranger81 |
Nov-21-07 12:24 PM |
#59 |
| -
Is Gun Control really part of the Democratic Agenda? |
Bleachers7 |
Nov-21-07 12:30 PM |
#62 |
| -
...and a B-52 will fit in my closet. |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 12:40 PM |
#69 |
| -
Not at all |
Bleachers7 |
Nov-21-07 12:44 PM |
#71 |
| -
Your "narrow limits" vs the election results of '94 |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 12:59 PM |
#75 |
| -
I'm not sure where the confusion is. |
Bleachers7 |
Nov-21-07 01:07 PM |
#77 |
| -
if so, then my bad |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 01:32 PM |
#91 |
| -
"Assault weapons" is as narrow as banning "all abortions after the 12th week"--i.e., it's NOT. |
benEzra |
Nov-21-07 02:43 PM |
#117 |
| -
While it may be a limited provision, these restrictions are important. |
stranger81 |
Nov-21-07 12:45 PM |
#72 |
| -
We should not back off. |
Bleachers7 |
Nov-21-07 12:53 PM |
#73 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-21-07 02:09 PM |
#103 |
| -
Stepping on a mine the second time won't make the result any different... |
SteveM |
Nov-21-07 05:52 PM |
#150 |
| -
Outlawing firearms that have been in civilian hands for 100 years... |
derby378 |
Nov-22-07 09:47 AM |
#216 |
| -
At what point did gun control become part of the Democratic core platform? |
EstimatedProphet |
Nov-23-07 03:04 PM |
#239 |
| -
Banning the most popular civilian target/defensive rifles in America... |
benEzra |
Nov-21-07 03:03 PM |
#125 |
| -
Thank you for pointing that out, Beachers |
FORREST GRUMP |
Nov-21-07 07:20 PM |
#164 |
| -
The "assault weapons ban" is precisely the problem |
dmesg |
Nov-21-07 09:12 PM |
#178 |
| -
agreed |
abmand |
Nov-21-07 10:03 PM |
#185 |
| -
I disagree. |
Bleachers7 |
Nov-21-07 12:18 PM |
#57 |
| -
I don't doubt that, but I also have no doubt the vast majority of DUers, |
stranger81 |
Nov-21-07 12:23 PM |
#58 |
| -
This is where the philosphical discussions get complicated |
Bleachers7 |
Nov-21-07 12:26 PM |
#60 |
| -
so why do you think gun control is a "bad habit" the party needs to abandon? |
stranger81 |
Nov-21-07 12:31 PM |
#63 |
| -
Gun rights is overplayed by members of the party |
Bleachers7 |
Nov-21-07 12:37 PM |
#65 |
| -
On all those issues, I hope my party takes the correct stance, |
dmesg |
Nov-21-07 10:16 PM |
#186 |
| -
Some of us DU'ers actually do hunt rabbits with assault rifles |
NickB79 |
Nov-21-07 01:03 PM |
#76 |
| -
take your pick... |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 01:40 PM |
#96 |
| -
An AK is more of a small-deer caliber (similar to .30-30 Winchester) |
benEzra |
Nov-21-07 02:37 PM |
#114 |
| -
Sigh... |
dmesg |
Nov-21-07 09:16 PM |
#179 |
| -
"Actual" AK-47s aren't illegal - just tightly regulated |
derby378 |
Nov-21-07 09:38 PM |
#182 |
| -
By that definition cocaine isn't "illegal" either... |
dmesg |
Nov-21-07 10:28 PM |
#191 |
| -
I see your point... |
derby378 |
Nov-22-07 09:34 AM |
#214 |
| -
I'd remind you that the Senate was recaptured in '06 by PRO-GUN DEMS... |
benEzra |
Nov-21-07 03:00 PM |
#124 |
| -
and Congress got their share of...... |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 03:32 PM |
#128 |
| -
McCarthy was already there, and wasn't running in a gun-owning district... |
benEzra |
Nov-21-07 04:20 PM |
#135 |
| -
my bad, had a flashback |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 04:34 PM |
#136 |
| -
I agree in general. |
Bleachers7 |
Nov-21-07 12:17 PM |
#56 |
| -
It's certainly clear we should not try to appease the NRA crowd |
NewJeffCT |
Nov-21-07 12:29 PM |
#61 |
| -
Meanwhile... |
beevul |
Nov-22-07 12:23 AM |
#207 |
| -
No one is talking about gun control except you. |
Cleita |
Nov-21-07 12:34 PM |
#64 |
| -
We've seen this on DU as well |
Bleachers7 |
Nov-21-07 12:40 PM |
#68 |
| -
Here's one poll that ran in General Discussion... |
benEzra |
Nov-21-07 02:51 PM |
#122 |
| -
I answered "yes" to that poll & I am for greater gun legislation. |
U4ikLefty |
Nov-21-07 07:50 PM |
#171 |
| -
Cleita... |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 01:16 PM |
#81 |
| -
I don't think Biden is after anyone, but trying to court a |
Cleita |
Nov-21-07 01:35 PM |
#93 |
| -
lol- right no one but little old me and |
cali |
Nov-21-07 02:11 PM |
#106 |
| -
First step: Refuse to support gun bans |
aikoaiko |
Nov-21-07 12:56 PM |
#74 |
| -
Nu-uh! Most Americans want MORE gun control. |
Perry Logan |
Nov-21-07 01:09 PM |
#78 |
| -
Exactly |
fascisthunter |
Nov-21-07 01:26 PM |
#88 |
| -
you have the floor |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 02:10 PM |
#104 |
| -
ONE ISSUE DID NOT DECIDE 1994'S ELECTION |
fascisthunter |
Nov-21-07 05:11 PM |
#141 |
| -
Even Bill Clinton said that is why we lost in 94 |
virginia mountainman |
Nov-21-07 05:27 PM |
#147 |
| -
Clinton Said Lots of things |
fascisthunter |
Nov-21-07 09:42 PM |
#184 |
| -
That "conservative BS"-er Bill Clinton said the AWB sank one Al Gore. PUre enough? |
SteveM |
Nov-21-07 06:13 PM |
#153 |
| -
"At least some regulation..." Like what? Even Texas' CCW law is a regulation. |
SteveM |
Nov-21-07 06:50 PM |
#159 |
| -
"Overwhelmingly?" |
derby378 |
Nov-21-07 09:40 PM |
#183 |
| -
Oh, stop making sense with facts |
Lorien |
Nov-22-07 01:00 AM |
#209 |
| -
Gee, that's funny |
MadHound |
Nov-21-07 01:21 PM |
#84 |
| -
The devil is in the details, MadHound |
slackmaster |
Nov-21-07 01:24 PM |
#86 |
| -
Banning the most popular target and defensive rifles in America... |
benEzra |
Nov-21-07 02:49 PM |
#121 |
| -
The opposite was true here in '94. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Nov-21-07 01:29 PM |
#90 |
| -
know how bernie sanders became Representative Sanders? |
cali |
Nov-21-07 02:13 PM |
#107 |
| -
Vermont's gun laws:________________________. Quiz follows (nt) |
SteveM |
Nov-21-07 06:18 PM |
#155 |
| -
I actually agree with you ... |
PassingFair |
Nov-21-07 03:32 PM |
#129 |
| -
gathering a consensus on the matter will be a monumental task in this country |
hiphopnation23 |
Nov-21-07 05:26 PM |
#146 |
| -
you're probably already on a watch-list |
Tejas |
Nov-21-07 05:49 PM |
#149 |
| -
In principle, you will be resisted vigorously. |
SteveM |
Nov-21-07 06:24 PM |
#156 |
| -
Who's "we"? |
benEzra |
Nov-21-07 06:49 PM |
#158 |
| -
we support that? |
dmesg |
Nov-21-07 09:21 PM |
#180 |
| -
Who is "we"? |
beevul |
Nov-22-07 12:27 AM |
#208 |
| -
Nor is it a priority issue. Good one Cali. nt |
Flabbergasted |
Nov-21-07 06:59 PM |
#162 |
| -
agreed |
upi402 |
Nov-21-07 07:24 PM |
#165 |
| -
there should be more gun control over crazy assed guys like Bush. |
Whisp |
Nov-21-07 07:36 PM |
#167 |
| -
It depends where one lives, and one's experiences. |
salin |
Nov-21-07 09:34 PM |
#181 |
| -
No one wants to see criminals with guns... |
benEzra |
Nov-22-07 01:11 PM |
#222 |
| -
It's a sad truth, cali, but it is the truth and I agree with you. |
David Zephyr |
Nov-21-07 10:47 PM |
#196 |
| -
The right to own guns and the 2nd amendment is a very LIBERAL idea.. |
B Calm |
Nov-21-07 11:38 PM |
#204 |
| -
Yeah, Right. "A Very LIBERAL Idea".... |
Paladin |
Nov-22-07 08:50 AM |
#213 |
| -
Not that shit again... |
beevul |
Nov-22-07 10:13 AM |
#217 |
| -
Well said. |
Alexander |
Nov-22-07 11:56 AM |
#220 |
| -
Excuse me! But personal freedoms is not a conservative idea! |
B Calm |
Nov-22-07 04:21 PM |
#227 |
| -
Yes! |
EstimatedProphet |
Nov-22-07 02:50 PM |
#225 |
| -
This time... |
sendero |
Nov-22-07 09:38 AM |
#215 |
| -
I agree. The theocratic nuts control the GOP. We should define ourselves as the party of freedom. |
impeachdubya |
Nov-22-07 03:17 PM |
#226 |
| -
THATS RIGHT! |
virginia mountainman |
Nov-23-07 06:33 AM |
#232 |
| -
Can't believe the lynch mob isn't here yet. n/t |
Tejas |
Nov-24-07 10:12 PM |
#248 |
| -
Absolutely. Well said. (n/t) |
benEzra |
Nov-23-07 02:46 PM |
#238 |
| -
Nobody here watched "Bowling for Columbine," did they? |
tomreedtoon |
Nov-24-07 03:47 PM |
#247 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore