You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #66: Sounds to me like you are setting up a situation... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
66. Sounds to me like you are setting up a situation...
where a non-violent offender could get charged with murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Rare Robbery Case Brings Cries of Racism. Wcross  Nov-18-07 08:01 AM   #0 
  - This is the felony murder rule  treestar   Nov-18-07 08:07 AM   #1 
  - "in this overwhelmingly white county under a ***rarely invoked*** legal doctrine"  asthmaticeog   Nov-18-07 08:14 AM   #2 
  - Define "rarely invoked." If they only have one or two felony murders a year...  mvccd1000   Nov-18-07 08:30 AM   #8 
     - Not my job to define anything, here.  asthmaticeog   Nov-18-07 08:51 AM   #10 
     - True - that wasn't directed at you specifically. The article...  mvccd1000   Nov-18-07 09:53 AM   #32 
     - Sounds to me like you are setting up a situation...  ret5hd   Nov-18-07 11:08 AM   #66 
        - True, it could do (and probably has done) that.  mvccd1000   Nov-19-07 03:43 AM   #98 
  - But according to the story it is rarely used in California.  Wcross   Nov-18-07 08:16 AM   #4 
     - I would like to see just how "rare" that law's application is.  Kingshakabobo   Nov-18-07 08:55 AM   #12 
     - I too question the use of a vague term like "rarely"  slackmaster   Nov-18-07 09:51 AM   #31 
  - The three did brutally beat his stepson with a bat.  cigsandcoffee   Nov-18-07 08:15 AM   #3 
  - Mr. Hughes will face charges for that to be sure.  Wcross   Nov-18-07 08:18 AM   #5 
  - I'd say that's more a question for the appeals courts than me.  cigsandcoffee   Nov-18-07 08:24 AM   #7 
  - Yes, he should be charged with murder. They conspired to commit a violent felony.  Alexander   Nov-18-07 04:22 PM   #86 
  - And he should be charged with that.  asthmaticeog   Nov-18-07 08:22 AM   #6 
  - Odd that the OP chose to leave that tidbit of info out, as well as the shattered window for entry.  alphafemale   Nov-18-07 09:47 AM   #28 
     - That and the allegation the robbers were armed with a shotgun and wearing bandannas.  Kingshakabobo   Nov-18-07 10:02 AM   #39 
     - Yeah. The original post almost sounds as if they dropped by to chat.  alphafemale   Nov-18-07 10:11 AM   #46 
     - I guess I should have pasted the entire article? (and run afoul of D.U. posting rules)  Wcross   Nov-18-07 10:14 AM   #50 
        - The fact that they broke in through a window and beat someone to brain damage with a metal bat  alphafemale   Nov-18-07 10:35 AM   #53 
  - Lesson learned..If you steal bring guns and shoot first  Toots   Nov-18-07 08:44 AM   #9 
  - It would be even nicer if people weren't breaking up into other  lizzy   Nov-18-07 09:16 AM   # 
  - Or don't break into peoples homes..Jesus  Pavulon   Nov-18-07 10:42 AM   #56 
  - I don't understand it either. n/t  Poll_Blind   Nov-18-07 03:05 PM   #77 
  - the thought processes on DU are frequently pathetic  BoneDaddy   Nov-19-07 08:36 AM   #100 
  - Lesson learned...don't burglarize other people's homes.  Alexander   Nov-18-07 04:25 PM   #87 
  - so let me get this straight  Evergreen Emerald   Nov-18-07 08:55 AM   #11 
  - While the beating was vile, how is shooting people in the back as they flee self defense?  jpgray   Nov-18-07 09:04 AM   #14 
  - HTF do you know he shot them when they were fleeing?  lizzy   Nov-18-07 09:07 AM   #16 
  - If they were shot in the back, then by legal definition, it's not self-defense. nt  asthmaticeog   Nov-18-07 02:27 PM   #69 
     - That is incorrect..  Pavulon   Nov-18-07 02:40 PM   #70 
     - Actually, you're partly right. That all varies from state to state. I posted too hastily.  asthmaticeog   Nov-18-07 02:48 PM   #73 
        - Sorry, No intent to be rude  Pavulon   Nov-18-07 03:00 PM   #76 
           - Basically I agree, until the last line.  asthmaticeog   Nov-18-07 03:06 PM   #79 
              - Mitigate is used to reduce  Pavulon   Nov-18-07 08:36 PM   #95 
                 - Are you in law?  asthmaticeog   Nov-18-07 09:01 PM   #97 
     - Wrong.  NutmegYankee   Nov-18-07 02:53 PM   #74 
        - I'd already acknowledged someone who corrected me, so why'd you need to post that?  asthmaticeog   Nov-18-07 02:57 PM   #75 
           - I had clicked reply before your post.  NutmegYankee   Nov-18-07 03:25 PM   #80 
              - Mmmmmm, no.  asthmaticeog   Nov-18-07 03:40 PM   #81 
                 - Can't take the truth huh.  NutmegYankee   Nov-18-07 03:54 PM   #82 
                    - I took a correction and owned up to my error. Your correction was redundant, unnecesssary and late.  asthmaticeog   Nov-18-07 04:13 PM   #83 
                       - Too late to change the story bud.  NutmegYankee   Nov-18-07 04:26 PM   #88 
                          - Not trying to change a thing.  asthmaticeog   Nov-18-07 05:01 PM   #89 
  - They were still in is house.  cigsandcoffee   Nov-18-07 09:10 AM   #17 
  - We don't even know if they actually flee.  lizzy   Nov-18-07 09:12 AM   #18 
     - Fair enough. I hadn't thought of that.  cigsandcoffee   Nov-18-07 09:16 AM   #20 
     - Does not matter..  Pavulon   Nov-18-07 10:49 AM   #58 
  - "flee in self defense?"  Evergreen Emerald   Nov-18-07 09:15 AM   #19 
  - Fear that the perpetrators might return to kill you is a valid reason to use deadly force  slackmaster   Nov-18-07 09:57 AM   #34 
  - The shooter isn't being charged with anything in this case.  lizzy   Nov-18-07 10:00 AM   #36 
     - Yes, I was responding to a query as to how the shooting could be justified  slackmaster   Nov-18-07 10:10 AM   #44 
  - Felony murder just requires death. Overkill doesn't enter into consideration.  BadgerLaw2010   Nov-18-07 10:03 AM   #40 
  - You forgot this part  michreject   Nov-18-07 10:12 AM   #47 
  - Isn't this the same type of law that almost  ikojo   Nov-18-07 09:02 AM   #13 
  - NO. This case  Pavulon   Nov-18-07 10:59 AM   #62 
  - NAACP is asking why homeowner is walking free?  lizzy   Nov-18-07 09:05 AM   #15 
  - He should have waited till they killed his son.....  Kingshakabobo   Nov-18-07 09:16 AM   #21 
  - Agreed. NAACP is smoking dope on that part. This is justified anywhere.  BadgerLaw2010   Nov-18-07 10:04 AM   #41 
  - The plot thickens...Maybe the NAACP has a point?  Wcross   Nov-18-07 09:21 AM   #22 
  - Well, from this, it sounds as if the suspects knew the pot was in  lizzy   Nov-18-07 09:28 AM   #23 
  - The shooter was dealing, he used a gun in the commission of a crime (dealing).  Wcross   Nov-18-07 09:41 AM   #26 
  - What would be the "dealing" part?  lizzy   Nov-18-07 09:45 AM   #27 
  - How was he "dealing" while sleeping in his bed?  Kingshakabobo   Nov-18-07 09:47 AM   #29 
     - Yea, I know.  lizzy   Nov-18-07 09:49 AM   #30 
        - Three pounds of pot? He had a prescription for personal use.  Wcross   Nov-18-07 09:58 AM   #35 
           - He shouldn't have owned a gun, and it's a fact?  lizzy   Nov-18-07 10:02 AM   #37 
              - He was in violation of federal law.  Wcross   Nov-18-07 10:10 AM   #45 
                 - Has he actually been convicted of any of the above, or did you  lizzy   Nov-18-07 10:12 AM   #48 
                    - 4. Possession of a firearm by a drug user or addict;  Wcross   Nov-18-07 10:19 AM   #52 
                       - I've tried to explain it to you but I guess to no avail.  lizzy   Nov-18-07 10:36 AM   #54 
                       - He did NOT have a license, he had a medical marijuana prescription.  Wcross   Nov-18-07 10:50 AM   #59 
                          - I meant license as a permission to use pot.  lizzy   Nov-18-07 10:53 AM   #60 
                             - Here's the rub with that theory- The gun law is federal.  Wcross   Nov-18-07 10:59 AM   #63 
                                - And the burglars committed assault and attempted murder.  Alexander   Nov-18-07 04:15 PM   #84 
                                   - I am not defending the thugs.  Wcross   Nov-18-07 05:44 PM   #90 
                                      - I don't think there is a requirement that the victim has to be the  lizzy   Nov-18-07 05:56 PM   #91 
                                         - You are correct.  Wcross   Nov-18-07 06:12 PM   #92 
                       - We'd probably have to see some working definition for drug with regard to statutes  aikoaiko   Nov-18-07 10:41 AM   #55 
                       - He's a legal user. His prescription no more forbids him from having a gun than an Rx for vicodin  LeftyMom   Nov-18-07 03:05 PM   #78 
  - Sounds like conspiracy to committ theft, armed burglary, armed robbery, and attempted murder  BadgerLaw2010   Nov-18-07 10:06 AM   #42 
     - I don't know how much time actual burglary gets someone.  lizzy   Nov-18-07 10:08 AM   #43 
        - This many seperate crimes? Easily life if maxed and run consecutively.  BadgerLaw2010   Nov-18-07 10:13 AM   #49 
           - Well, 10 years, but as far as I understand it, the criminals do not  lizzy   Nov-18-07 10:15 AM   #51 
              - Hence the 1st degree murder charge.  Alexander   Nov-18-07 04:17 PM   #85 
  - OK. So they hadn't fled? If he's chasing them from the house, that's different.  jpgray   Nov-18-07 09:28 AM   #24 
     - As long as a threat is present  Pavulon   Nov-18-07 10:55 AM   #61 
  - He IS responsible. Charges should be pursued.  MNDemNY   Nov-18-07 09:30 AM   #25 
  - It sounds like Mr. Hughes is getting a vigorous criminal defense  slackmaster   Nov-18-07 09:53 AM   #33 
  - This is normal felony murder. You initiate a specified felony and someone dies, you get charged.  BadgerLaw2010   Nov-18-07 10:02 AM   #38 
  - Considering a young kid was apparently beaten to a point he can't any  lizzy   Nov-18-07 10:49 AM   #57 
  - In this case, probably nothing short of execution. There are some weird felony murder cases, though.  BadgerLaw2010   Nov-18-07 11:07 AM   #65 
  - The attackers had already escalated to lethal force.  benEzra   Nov-18-07 11:54 AM   #68 
  - Views of the evidence of perfect and imperfect self-defense almost always come together.  BadgerLaw2010   Nov-18-07 07:21 PM   #94 
  - Survivor indicates relevant level of force  Pavulon   Nov-18-07 02:45 PM   #71 
  - I can't believe the NAACP is attacking the homeowner.  aikoaiko   Nov-18-07 11:05 AM   #64 
  - So armed criminals break into your house, beat your son practically to brain death,  benEzra   Nov-18-07 11:51 AM   #67 
  - They beat his stepson with baseball bats. Hughes can go cry me a river.  Alexander   Nov-18-07 02:48 PM   #72 
  - The felony murder rule is not some archaic, draconian principle. (nt)  MJDuncan1982   Nov-18-07 06:56 PM   #93 
  - It seems like an appropriate charge in this case  tammywammy   Nov-18-07 08:46 PM   #96 
  - Was the survivor the one who pursuaded the others to take part in the theft?  Donald Ian Rankin   Nov-19-07 08:01 AM   #99 
     - What do you mean by "persuade"?  Kingshakabobo   Nov-19-07 12:12 PM   #101 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC