Reply #95: I don't agree with you and your argument would have carried more weight

[Cerridwen]

with me if you hadn't begun you first post to this thread with name calling; I consider that a "petty hissyfit"; hardly informed debate or argument.

1) And then you continued with name calling - "sheer lunacy" and "petty hissyfit" and another slam against DUers.

2) Impeachment results in a trial in the Senate. Articles of Impeachment are read on the Senate floor into the official record. The media might even deign to cover it. The American public, including those "not well informed" DUers you took a jab at, might learn a thing or two about who is occupying the White House.

I, for one, would rather our country was governed based on the Constitution rather than what the media might say or do. Should the media decide to spin and contort, perhaps there are enough of us paying attention we could inform our friends and neighbors of what's really happening. Though if you are any example of the debate skills of my allies, I think we might be screwed and you might be right that impeachment would turn into a lose-lose rather than the win-win it has the potential to be.

Please, note, I did resort to name calling in this post.

edit: spelling