You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: No it was an agreement to record votes to consider Hoyer's motion. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. No it was an agreement to record votes to consider Hoyer's motion.
Now, they're voting (5 minutes) on the actual motion.

Convoluted, but it's how they work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Official thread # 1 Kuccinich ---impeachment resolutuon, cspan1 rodeodance  Nov-06-07 03:08 PM   #0 
  - there must be 100 threads. lets talk  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:09 PM   #1 
  - boy, am I delighted. I think  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:09 PM   #2 
  - Wooo Hoooo K and R  ClayZ   Nov-06-07 03:09 PM   #3 
  - Are they going right into the one-hour debate?  LSparkle   Nov-06-07 03:09 PM   #4 
  - Hoyer wants to Refer to House Jud. committee but Bonner seems to want to chat about it  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:12 PM   #12 
     - Is moving it to Judiciary another way to kill it?  LSparkle   Nov-06-07 03:13 PM   #15 
        - Yes  hootinholler   Nov-06-07 03:22 PM   #24 
  - THANK YOU!  rucky   Nov-06-07 03:10 PM   #5 
  - you bet  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:11 PM   #9 
  - can anyone explain what is going on?  eShirl   Nov-06-07 03:10 PM   #6 
  - i thought i heard the announcer say this was on the prev. question.  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:10 PM   #7 
  - I think being to refer to judiciary. Not the second, which was for a vote on that.  Gregorian   Nov-06-07 03:11 PM   #11 
  - We need a Congressional scholar to explain just what is happening.  Gregorian   Nov-06-07 03:10 PM   #8 
  - If it goes to the Judiciary Committee, it's in Conyers' hands, right?  kestrel91316   Nov-06-07 03:31 PM   #41 
  - Call Congress 1-800-828-0498, 1-800-862-5530, 1-800-833-6354  bobthedrummer   Nov-06-07 03:11 PM   #10 
  - Did it! Kick  ClayZ   Nov-06-07 03:22 PM   #25 
  - Voting "On ordering the Previous Question"  WritersBlock   Nov-06-07 03:12 PM   #13 
  - the leadership does NOT know what is happening.  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:14 PM   #16 
  - YaHOOOOOOOOOOOo  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:12 PM   #14 
  - I have NEVER seen switching votes like this before!  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:15 PM   #17 
  - 'dems caught FLAT-FOOTED" on this one!  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:15 PM   #18 
  - this is fucking crazy  LSK   Nov-06-07 03:15 PM   #19 
  - I'm not THAT politically savvy;  greiner3   Nov-06-07 03:15 PM   #20 
  - if this votes succeeds then they move onto debate?--is that what they said?  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:17 PM   #22 
  - says Dems might do an Ajourn motion.  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:16 PM   #21 
  - Kickety  rucky   Nov-06-07 03:21 PM   #23 
  - As I understand it, this is a procedural vote to vote on Hoyer's motion  pinto   Nov-06-07 03:24 PM   #26 
  - YES NOW-5 min vote to Ref to JUD committee *made by HOYER  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:24 PM   #27 
  - I thought they just voted on that  underpants   Nov-06-07 03:25 PM   #31 
  - And if I get the rules right, Kucinich's request for privilege stands.  pinto   Nov-06-07 03:26 PM   #33 
  - wasnt the previous vote to move it to committee?  LSK   Nov-06-07 03:24 PM   #28 
  - No it was an agreement to record votes to consider Hoyer's motion.  pinto   Nov-06-07 03:28 PM   #36 
  - Has any1 seen/heard Speaker Pelosi today?  WilyWondr   Nov-06-07 03:25 PM   #29 
  - Does anyone have the roll call of the motion to table?  me b zola   Nov-06-07 03:25 PM   #30 
  - I love you, rodeodance. Was about to do the same.  timeforarevolution   Nov-06-07 03:26 PM   #32 
  - first Hoyer motioned to table it but failed (Repugs SURPRIzed all), then Hoyer motioned  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:28 PM   #35 
     - Right in the middle of the To table it vote, Repugs suddenly started switing their vote  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:30 PM   #40 
  - how embaressing!! Dems do NOT want debate but all Repugs voting for debate  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:27 PM   #34 
  - well it would be a debate of a few hours versus hearings for days and days  LSK   Nov-06-07 03:29 PM   #37 
  - Dems need simple majority -218 to send to Judiciary committee (Hoyer wants it there)  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:29 PM   #38 
  - We WANT hearings, not just a quick debate and vote and it's over.  kestrel91316   Nov-06-07 03:33 PM   #45 
  - hey guys, Boehner is trying to set up the Dems for a fall on this  alyce douglas   Nov-06-07 03:30 PM   #39 
  - Dennis is very tough  OzarkDem   Nov-06-07 03:32 PM   #42 
  - I am hopeful - the people are STARVING for this fight - I think they made a HUGE mistake  debbierlus   Nov-06-07 03:33 PM   #44 
  - this is great, only if the Dems stay strong, and will not let those  alyce douglas   Nov-06-07 03:40 PM   #55 
  - I don't think that is a problem with Dennis  madokie   Nov-06-07 03:34 PM   #46 
  - It's the Dems' to lose.  rucky   Nov-06-07 03:34 PM   #48 
  - 218-194 MOTION is adoped. NOW a motion to reconsider is laid on the table  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:32 PM   #43 
  - What is a motion to reconsider? eom  Mojorabbit   Nov-06-07 03:34 PM   #47 
  - Topic subject COMMITTEE HERE WE COME, ITS MOVING ON!!!  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:34 PM   #49 
     - Topic subject MR. CONYERS, THE BALL IS IN YOUR COURT!  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:36 PM   #51 
        - Topic subject GOP forces debate on Cheney impeachment  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:39 PM   #54 
           - Topic subject THE US HOUSE JUST VOTED TO MOVE IT TO COMMITTEE  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:40 PM   # 
              - Topic subject Conyers Throws Cold Water on Cheney Impeachment Drive  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:45 PM   #57 
  - Committee: we'll never hear a thing about it again...  sampsonblk   Nov-06-07 03:36 PM   #50 
  - when cheney is up for war crimes they will blame pelosi for not bringing it out of committee  spanone   Nov-06-07 03:38 PM   #52 
  - Conyers is the chair of the committee.  rucky   Nov-06-07 03:38 PM   #53 
     - Its a lot to ask of Conyers  sampsonblk   Nov-06-07 05:23 PM   #59 
  - This has put Dennis on the map (and we might get back our country yet)  bambino   Nov-06-07 03:40 PM   #56 
     - Topic subject The Hill: Republicans keep Cheney impeachment bill alive  rodeodance   Nov-06-07 03:47 PM   #58 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC