polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
| 18. At this point we have ZERO leadership... |
|
If the party was functional (and not chock full of faux Dems) it would take one brilliant spokesperson one pointed speech to call Bush's bullshit exactly what it is in terms that would leave nobody but Bush apologists confused. This is beyond pitiful!
|
| -New Dem talking point. If Dems don't vote the money * wants, he's gonna leave troops there without |
OregonBlue |
Nov-04-07 12:53 PM |
#0 |
 -
That's murder. |
aquart |
Nov-04-07 12:54 PM |
#1 |
 -
Yes and EVERY Dem should be pointing it out. Screaming it from every rooftop. |
OregonBlue |
Nov-04-07 12:57 PM |
#4 |
 -
Well, I'd adjust the Pissy Pants but otherwise, right into the Congressional Record. |
aquart |
Nov-04-07 04:44 PM |
#32 |
| -
And it would be BUSH that's responsible for that murder, NOT the congress! |
calipendence |
Nov-04-07 01:34 PM |
#25 |
| -
even if the threat was made, this is when you call the bluff. |
ulysses |
Nov-04-07 12:56 PM |
#2 |
| -
Its time to call him out on his threats |
OzarkDem |
Nov-04-07 12:56 PM |
#3 |
| -
True, and it would help to choose a strong spokesperson... |
polichick |
Nov-04-07 12:58 PM |
#6 |
| -
Actually Jim Webb has called him on it. Why haven't the other Dems? |
OregonBlue |
Nov-04-07 01:05 PM |
#14 |
| -
imo they're either a bunch of chickenshit fools... |
polichick |
Nov-04-07 01:11 PM |
#16 |
| -
Agreed. We are so screwn! But they could turn this back on him if they wanted. |
OregonBlue |
Nov-04-07 01:24 PM |
#17 |
| -
For all the talk of being "united" they are not |
OzarkDem |
Nov-04-07 01:28 PM |
#22 |
| -
He would be good |
OzarkDem |
Nov-04-07 01:27 PM |
#21 |
| -
I heard him on some political show recently... |
polichick |
Nov-04-07 01:33 PM |
#24 |
| -
How much is going to support the troops and how much is going into private bank accounts in |
OregonBlue |
Nov-04-07 12:59 PM |
#7 |
| -
What utter cr@p! |
sfexpat2000 |
Nov-04-07 12:58 PM |
#5 |
| -
He's said it repeatedly. The Dems need to vote the money he needs because they have to support the |
OregonBlue |
Nov-04-07 01:02 PM |
#10 |
| -
So "he" is Bush? That would make it a BushCo talking point |
sfexpat2000 |
Nov-04-07 01:05 PM |
#13 |
| -
Oh -- I get it now. The Dems are turning Junior's talking point back on him. |
sfexpat2000 |
Nov-04-07 01:08 PM |
#15 |
| -
is there a link to this statement? or is this extrapolation? |
niyad |
Nov-04-07 01:00 PM |
#8 |
| -
He has said repeatedly that they need the money for ammunition, etc. So if he doesn't get it, is he |
OregonBlue |
Nov-04-07 01:04 PM |
#12 |
| -
The Dems have said that since they took over congress. So they use it as an |
John Q. Citizen |
Nov-04-07 01:00 PM |
#9 |
| -
Oh sure! |
JVS |
Nov-04-07 01:03 PM |
#11 |
| -
At this point we have ZERO leadership... |
polichick |
Nov-04-07 01:26 PM |
#18 |
| -
The next chunk of money will fund an Iranian Bombing Campaign. |
tekisui |
Nov-04-07 01:26 PM |
#19 |
| -
Yep...and if we know that, don't our Congresspeople know it too?? nt |
polichick |
Nov-04-07 01:45 PM |
#29 |
| -
Pukes sure have a way of framing the debate |
libodem |
Nov-04-07 01:26 PM |
#20 |
| -
You need a great speaker like Mario Cuomo AND collective will... |
polichick |
Nov-04-07 01:43 PM |
#28 |
| -
Which he probably would do |
supernova |
Nov-04-07 01:30 PM |
#23 |
| -
Oh, poor babies. Big bad Bush made them support the war AGAIN, eh? |
Voltaire99 |
Nov-04-07 01:36 PM |
#26 |
| -
He has already killed thousands of them for political gain |
NNN0LHI |
Nov-04-07 01:38 PM |
#27 |
| -
I believe he would do it |
KingFlorez |
Nov-04-07 01:52 PM |
#30 |
| -
True, as long as impeachment is off the table. nt |
polichick |
Nov-04-07 01:58 PM |
#31 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread